← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

aniread vs cleanepi

A side-by-side editorial comparison of aniread and cleanepi — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

aniread vs cleanepi: at a glance

Featureanireadcleanepi
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score3.80.0
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesanimal tracking, file formats, auto-detection, data importepiverse-trace, data-cleaning, line-list, reporting
Last editorial update8h ago4d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is aniread?

aniread stops asking you to know which tracker wrote the file

aniread is the reader package of the animovement suite, importing output from pose-estimation, centroid and behavioural-scoring tools into aniframe objects. Through 0.5.x the work was per-reader: get_supported_sources() exposed the format list programmatically, read_boris() added behavioural events, and Octron and BORIS each got targeted fixes. 0.6.0 changes the shape of the interface itself — read_dataset() takes any supported file through one entry point and detect_source() works out which software wrote it by inspecting contents, not just the suffix.

Read the full aniread trajectory →

What is cleanepi?

cleanepi is in the long tail of bug fixes that follows a 1.0 — and changed maintainers along the way.

cleanepi cleans and standardises epidemiological line list data — dates, subject IDs, missing values, duplicates — and produces a report of what it changed. Since 1.0.0 in mid-2024 the releases have been almost entirely corrective: date-guesser fixes, report structure fixes and matching behaviour corrections. Maintainership passed to Bubacarr Bah in 1.1.2.

Read the full cleanepi trajectory →

aniread vs cleanepi: editorial side-by-side

A
aniread
ANALYTICS
3.8

aniread stops asking you to know which tracker wrote the file

◆ Current state

aniread is the reader package of the animovement suite, importing output from pose-estimation, centroid and behavioural-scoring tools into aniframe objects. Through 0.5.x the work was per-reader: get_supported_sources() exposed the format list programmatically, read_boris() added behavioural events, and Octron and BORIS each got targeted fixes. 0.6.0 changes the shape of the interface itself — read_dataset() takes any supported file through one entry point and detect_source() works out which software wrote it by inspecting contents, not just the suffix.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from a set of named readers to a dispatcher with the readers behind it, and the hard part is being handled rather than hidden: twelve sources emit .csv, so detection narrows by suffix then inspects content, and DeepLabCut and LightningPose files are structurally identical so it returns the combined 'deeplabcut/lightningpose' rather than guessing wrong. The honesty extends to gaps — optional-dependency detectors are skipped when the package is absent and the error names what was skipped, and SLEAP's csv suffix was withdrawn because auto-detection would have routed files into a reader that cannot read them. Alongside this, read_trackball() was substantially repaired for real two-sensor Bonsai captures, where alignment, clocks, corrupt rows and gap filling were each independently wrong.

◆ Prediction

Expect the withdrawn SLEAP csv suffix to return once read_sleap() gains support, since the changelog explicitly parks it against issue #87. Further detectors are the natural next increment, and the sensor-local-clock warning class suggests trackball alignment is not finished.

C
cleanepi
ANALYTICS
0.0

cleanepi is in the long tail of bug fixes that follows a 1.0 — and changed maintainers along the way.

◆ Current state

cleanepi cleans and standardises epidemiological line list data — dates, subject IDs, missing values, duplicates — and produces a report of what it changed. Since 1.0.0 in mid-2024 the releases have been almost entirely corrective: date-guesser fixes, report structure fixes and matching behaviour corrections. Maintainership passed to Bubacarr Bah in 1.1.2.

◆ Where it's heading

Work has concentrated on the report object and on making the cleaning functions behave predictably at the edges — case- and whitespace-insensitive missing-value matching, report elements returned as vectors instead of comma-separated strings, an argument to print a single operation's report. The underlying cleaning API has barely moved since 1.0.0, which suggests it is settled.

◆ Prediction

The report interface has been reworked repeatedly across these releases and is the most likely place for further change; the cleaning functions themselves look stable.

Alternatives to aniread and cleanepi

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either aniread or cleanepi.

See all aniread alternatives → · See all cleanepi alternatives →

Recent activity from aniread and cleanepi

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 19h agoanireadv0.6.0 — one entry point for every format
  2. 1mo agoanireadget_supported_sources(); Octron gap and BORIS index fixes
  3. 1mo agoanireadread_boris() imports behavioural events as anievent objects
  4. 3mo agoanireadread_octron() property selection, speed and a silent-recycling fix
  5. 3mo agoaniready-origin standardised to bottom-left across eleven readers
  6. 9mo agocleanepiCase-insensitive missing-value matching and report fixes
  7. 1y agocleanepiReport elements become vectors; date parsing default restored
  8. 1y agocleanepiDate guesser corrected; empty-row indices fixed
  9. 2y agocleanepiFirst major release with cleaning and reporting

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between aniread and cleanepi?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. aniread is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is aniread better than cleanepi?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. aniread is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to aniread?

Top aniread alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "aniread alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/aniread for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to cleanepi?

Top cleanepi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cleanepi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cleanepi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.