← Back to home
Comparison · Meetings

Ant Media Server vs Element Call

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Ant Media Server and Element Call — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:webrtc

Ant Media Server vs Element Call: at a glance

FeatureAnt Media ServerElement Call
SectorMeetingsMeetings
Velocity score6.35.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeslive streaming, webrtc, av1 codec, ssai-scte35video calls, matrix, livekit, webrtc
Last editorial update5mo ago2d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Ant Media Server?

Ant Media crossed the 3.0 line with AV1, eight CVE patches, and a breaking API cleanup.

Ant Media Server has just shipped its 3.0 series. The cut version, 3.0.1, packed an AV1 codec path, removed long-deprecated methods (potentially breaking integrations), patched roughly eight CVEs in the parent and management console, and added Strict-Transport-Security headers and daily SSL renewal checks. Two follow-up tags (3.0.2, 3.0.3) appear to be quick rebuilds rather than feature releases. The recent 2.17.x line had introduced server-side ad insertion (SSAI with SCTE-35), a v2 WebRTC web SDK, and LL-HLS cluster play.

Read the full Ant Media Server trajectory →

What is Element Call?

Element Call starts moving to new LiveKit transports and falls back to remote SFUs when needed.

Element Call ships a release candidate roughly every two to three weeks. v0.28.1-rc.1 adds a breaking change that falls back to publishing media on a remote SFU when possible, supports migrating to new LiveKit transport types and endpoints, and fixes room v12 power-level compatibility. It also brings in a MatrixRTC SDK and patches several dependency security advisories. The previous rc added a quick audio menu and redacted analytics IDs from rageshakes.

Read the full Element Call trajectory →

Ant Media Server vs Element Call: editorial side-by-side

A6.3

Ant Media crossed the 3.0 line with AV1, eight CVE patches, and a breaking API cleanup.

◆ Current state

Ant Media Server has just shipped its 3.0 series. The cut version, 3.0.1, packed an AV1 codec path, removed long-deprecated methods (potentially breaking integrations), patched roughly eight CVEs in the parent and management console, and added Strict-Transport-Security headers and daily SSL renewal checks. Two follow-up tags (3.0.2, 3.0.3) appear to be quick rebuilds rather than feature releases. The recent 2.17.x line had introduced server-side ad insertion (SSAI with SCTE-35), a v2 WebRTC web SDK, and LL-HLS cluster play.

◆ Where it's heading

The product is in a 'broadcaster-grade plus security hardening' arc. SSAI/SCTE-35 is a clear push toward live-event monetization use cases, while AV1 and v2 WebRTC SDK target streaming infrastructure that competes with managed services. The CVE volume across recent releases (2.16.2 was nothing but patches; 2.17.1 and 3.0.1 each carried multiple) suggests an active third-party security review or fuzzing program is feeding the queue.

◆ Prediction

Expect 3.0.x point releases focused on stabilizing AV1 in production, mopping up regressions from the deprecated-method removals, and continued CVE patching. The next functional bet to watch is whether SSAI gets enterprise-grade analytics or whether AV1 gets hardware-accelerated encode paths.

E
Element Call
MEETINGS
5.0

Element Call starts moving to new LiveKit transports and falls back to remote SFUs when needed.

◆ Current state

Element Call ships a release candidate roughly every two to three weeks. v0.28.1-rc.1 adds a breaking change that falls back to publishing media on a remote SFU when possible, supports migrating to new LiveKit transport types and endpoints, and fixes room v12 power-level compatibility. It also brings in a MatrixRTC SDK and patches several dependency security advisories. The previous rc added a quick audio menu and redacted analytics IDs from rageshakes.

◆ Where it's heading

With the MatrixRTC protocol cutover finished in August, the team is now working on the media transport layer itself: how calls find and publish to SFUs and how LiveKit endpoints change underneath them. Packaging the RTC logic as an SDK suggests it is meant to be reused beyond the Element Call app.

◆ Prediction

Expect a 0.28.1 final and follow-ups to the LiveKit transport migration; whether the MatrixRTC SDK gets its own release isn't clear from the entries.

Alternatives to Ant Media Server and Element Call

Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Ant Media Server or Element Call.

See all Ant Media Server alternatives → · See all Element Call alternatives →

Recent activity from Ant Media Server and Element Call

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoElement CallElement Call 0.28.1 rc adds remote-SFU fallback and LiveKit migration
  2. 23d agoElement CallQuick audio menu, bell reaction sound and redacted analytics IDs
  3. 1mo agoElement Callv0.26.1-rc.1
  4. 1mo agoElement Callv0.26.0-rc.2
  5. 1mo agoElement Callv0.26.0-rc.1
  6. 2mo agoElement CallMatrixRTC legacy mode removed — all calls now run on the new protocol ⚡
  7. 5mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 3.0.3: rebuild tag with no published changelog
  8. 5mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 3.0.2: SNAPSHOT version bump and quality items
  9. 6mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 3.0.1: AV1 codec, breaking API cleanup, eight CVE patches ⚡
  10. 8mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 2.17.1: WebRTC timing fixes, SRT restream endpoints, local license server
  11. 8mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 2.17.0: SSAI with SCTE-35 and WebRTC Web SDK v2 ⚡
  12. 10mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 2.16.2: five CVE patches in the parent

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Ant Media Server and Element Call?

Both compete on the same themes — webrtc — within Meetings. Ant Media Server is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Ant Media Server better than Element Call?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Ant Media Server is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Ant Media Server?

Top Ant Media Server alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Ant Media Server alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ant-media for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Element Call?

Top Element Call alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Element Call alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/element-call for the full list with editorial commentary on each.