← Back to home
Comparison · Meetings

Ant Media Server vs SRS

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Ant Media Server and SRS — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:webrtc

Ant Media Server vs SRS: at a glance

FeatureAnt Media ServerSRS
SectorMeetingsMeetings
Velocity score6.36.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themeslive streaming, webrtc, av1 codec, ssai-scte35streaming-servers, webrtc, hevc, protocol-coverage
Last editorial update3mo ago6d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Ant Media Server?

Ant Media crossed the 3.0 line with AV1, eight CVE patches, and a breaking API cleanup.

Ant Media Server has just shipped its 3.0 series. The cut version, 3.0.1, packed an AV1 codec path, removed long-deprecated methods (potentially breaking integrations), patched roughly eight CVEs in the parent and management console, and added Strict-Transport-Security headers and daily SSL renewal checks. Two follow-up tags (3.0.2, 3.0.3) appear to be quick rebuilds rather than feature releases. The recent 2.17.x line had introduced server-side ad insertion (SSAI with SCTE-35), a v2 WebRTC web SDK, and LL-HLS cluster play.

Read the full Ant Media Server trajectory →

What is SRS?

SRS opens a 7.0 line built on a Go proxy tier, and drops features it no longer wants to carry.

SRS shipped the stable 6.0 line's first release on 12 August and, three hours later, the first development build of 7.0. The 6.0 line is now in pure maintenance — the r1 changelog is seven merges of DVR, WebRTC and edge fixes. Everything new is in 7.0-d0: RTSP playback, RTMPS, IPv6 across every protocol, HEVC in both directions between RTMP and WebRTC, and HLS fMP4 segments for HEVC and LL-HLS.

Read the full SRS trajectory →

Ant Media Server vs SRS: editorial side-by-side

A6.3

Ant Media crossed the 3.0 line with AV1, eight CVE patches, and a breaking API cleanup.

◆ Current state

Ant Media Server has just shipped its 3.0 series. The cut version, 3.0.1, packed an AV1 codec path, removed long-deprecated methods (potentially breaking integrations), patched roughly eight CVEs in the parent and management console, and added Strict-Transport-Security headers and daily SSL renewal checks. Two follow-up tags (3.0.2, 3.0.3) appear to be quick rebuilds rather than feature releases. The recent 2.17.x line had introduced server-side ad insertion (SSAI with SCTE-35), a v2 WebRTC web SDK, and LL-HLS cluster play.

◆ Where it's heading

The product is in a 'broadcaster-grade plus security hardening' arc. SSAI/SCTE-35 is a clear push toward live-event monetization use cases, while AV1 and v2 WebRTC SDK target streaming infrastructure that competes with managed services. The CVE volume across recent releases (2.16.2 was nothing but patches; 2.17.1 and 3.0.1 each carried multiple) suggests an active third-party security review or fuzzing program is feeding the queue.

◆ Prediction

Expect 3.0.x point releases focused on stabilizing AV1 in production, mopping up regressions from the deprecated-method removals, and continued CVE patching. The next functional bet to watch is whether SSAI gets enterprise-grade analytics or whether AV1 gets hardware-accelerated encode paths.

S
SRS
MEETINGS
6.3

SRS opens a 7.0 line built on a Go proxy tier, and drops features it no longer wants to carry.

◆ Current state

SRS shipped the stable 6.0 line's first release on 12 August and, three hours later, the first development build of 7.0. The 6.0 line is now in pure maintenance — the r1 changelog is seven merges of DVR, WebRTC and edge fixes. Everything new is in 7.0-d0: RTSP playback, RTMPS, IPv6 across every protocol, HEVC in both directions between RTMP and WebRTC, and HLS fMP4 segments for HEVC and LL-HLS.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is trading breadth of legacy surface for a narrower, better-covered core. 7.0-d0 removes the embedded GB28181 SIP server, multi-threading, Cygwin, and most configuration hot reload, while introducing a Go proxy server and origin-cluster architecture alongside the C++ media core. Protocol coverage keeps generalizing — each release makes a codec or an address family a property of the server rather than of one delivery path.

◆ Prediction

Expect the 7.0 line to run a long alpha and beta train the way 6.0 did, with the Go proxy and origin clustering carrying most of the remaining work and 6.0 continuing to receive backported fixes in parallel.

Alternatives to Ant Media Server and SRS

Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Ant Media Server or SRS.

See all Ant Media Server alternatives → · See all SRS alternatives →

Recent activity from Ant Media Server and SRS

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6d agoSRSSRS 7.0-d0: Go proxy tier, RTSP playback, IPv6 across protocols
  2. 6d agoSRS6.0-r1: DVR, WebRTC and edge fixes on the stable line
  3. 3mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 3.0.3: rebuild tag with no published changelog
  4. 3mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 3.0.2: SNAPSHOT version bump and quality items
  5. 4mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 3.0.1: AV1 codec, breaking API cleanup, eight CVE patches
  6. 6mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 2.17.1: WebRTC timing fixes, SRT restream endpoints, local license server
  7. 6mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 2.17.0: SSAI with SCTE-35 and WebRTC Web SDK v2
  8. 8mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 2.16.2: five CVE patches in the parent
  9. 8mo agoSRSSRS 6.0 goes stable with H.265 across RTMP, HLS, TS and SRT
  10. 9mo agoSRS6.0-b3: use-after-free and HLS cleanup fixes
  11. 10mo agoSRS6.0-b2: configurable SRT stream IDs and a WHIP transcoding fix
  12. 11mo agoSRS6.0-b1: RTC crash fixes, Windows binary dropped

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Ant Media Server and SRS?

Both compete on the same themes — webrtc — within Meetings. Ant Media Server and SRS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Ant Media Server better than SRS?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Ant Media Server and SRS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Ant Media Server?

Top Ant Media Server alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Ant Media Server alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ant-media for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to SRS?

Top SRS alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "SRS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/srs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.