← Back to home
Comparison · Meetings

Asterisk vs BigBlueButton

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Asterisk and BigBlueButton — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Asterisk vs BigBlueButton: at a glance

FeatureAsteriskBigBlueButton
SectorMeetingsMeetings
Velocity score5.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themestelephony, multi-branch-backports, security-releases, lts-maintenanceweb-conferencing, livekit-migration, self-hosted, mobile-layout
Last editorial update11d ago5d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Asterisk?

Four parallel branches, one fix set — Asterisk's changelog is a backport ledger, not a feature list.

Asterisk maintains mainline 20, 22 and 23 branches alongside a certified track, and lands each fix set across all of them at once. The June 25 batch was a coordinated security release resolving roughly 20 advisories on every branch simultaneously. The August 7 batch opens the next cycle with release candidates carrying identical commit, author and issue counts across 23.5.0, 22.11.0 and 20.21.0.

Read the full Asterisk trajectory →

What is BigBlueButton?

BigBlueButton is polishing the 4.0 beta it already committed to LiveKit, while 3.0 stays the production line.

The 4.0 beta series is in its fifth iteration and the hard architectural decisions are behind it — LiveKit became the default media stack in beta.4 with the legacy SIP.js bridge deleted, BlockNote became the default shared notes engine, and the JVM moved to Java 21. Beta.5 is consolidation: a mobile layout overhaul with paginated webcams and landscape side-by-side camera and presentation, automatic light/dark switching, a dedicated Audio settings tab with push-to-talk, and better BBB-to-LiveKit state reconciliation on reconnect. Packaging gained a bbbctl admin tool and a bbb-coturn package, with bbb-etherpad and bbb-pads now optional. The project still recommends 3.0.x for production.

Read the full BigBlueButton trajectory →

Asterisk vs BigBlueButton: editorial side-by-side

A
Asterisk
MEETINGS
5.0

Four parallel branches, one fix set — Asterisk's changelog is a backport ledger, not a feature list.

◆ Current state

Asterisk maintains mainline 20, 22 and 23 branches alongside a certified track, and lands each fix set across all of them at once. The June 25 batch was a coordinated security release resolving roughly 20 advisories on every branch simultaneously. The August 7 batch opens the next cycle with release candidates carrying identical commit, author and issue counts across 23.5.0, 22.11.0 and 20.21.0.

◆ Where it's heading

The visible output is backport discipline rather than feature development. Release notes carry counts, tags and advisory IDs but no feature text, so the changelog reads as a stability and security ledger for a mature telephony core. The certified track deliberately lags mainline and picks up a smaller subset of each cycle.

◆ Prediction

The three release candidates should promote to final within the project's usual short RC window, with the certified branch taking the same fixes a cycle later. Nothing in these entries points to feature work in flight.

BigBlueButton logo6.3

BigBlueButton is polishing the 4.0 beta it already committed to LiveKit, while 3.0 stays the production line.

◆ Current state

The 4.0 beta series is in its fifth iteration and the hard architectural decisions are behind it — LiveKit became the default media stack in beta.4 with the legacy SIP.js bridge deleted, BlockNote became the default shared notes engine, and the JVM moved to Java 21. Beta.5 is consolidation: a mobile layout overhaul with paginated webcams and landscape side-by-side camera and presentation, automatic light/dark switching, a dedicated Audio settings tab with push-to-talk, and better BBB-to-LiveKit state reconciliation on reconnect. Packaging gained a bbbctl admin tool and a bbb-coturn package, with bbb-etherpad and bbb-pads now optional. The project still recommends 3.0.x for production.

◆ Where it's heading

The 4.0 line is converging toward a release candidate, and the work has shifted from replacing subsystems to making the new ones survive real conditions — reconnects, phones, and administrator tooling. Making etherpad and pads optional alongside a security advisory that urges API secret rotation points at shrinking the default install's attack surface. The parallel 3.0.x train continues shipping security patches, so the ecosystem is carrying two branches until 4.0 stabilises.

◆ Prediction

Expect beta.6 or a release candidate to focus on the LiveKit reconnection and mobile paths that beta.5 only started, since those are the areas where a self-hosted media migration typically breaks. The optional-package work suggests a slimmer default deployment is being prepared for the 4.0 release.

Alternatives to Asterisk and BigBlueButton

Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Asterisk or BigBlueButton.

See all Asterisk alternatives → · See all BigBlueButton alternatives →

Recent activity from Asterisk and BigBlueButton

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5d agoBigBlueButton4.0 beta.5: mobile layout overhaul, audio settings, bbbctl admin tool
  2. 11d agoAsteriskCertified 22.8-cert4: 8 community-reported fixes
  3. 11d agoAsterisk23.5.0-rc1 opens the cycle with 27 issues resolved
  4. 11d agoAsterisk22.11.0-rc1 mirrors the 23.5.0 fix set
  5. 11d agoAsterisk20.21.0-rc1 carries the same set back to the LTS line
  6. 26d agoBigBlueButton4.0 beta.4: LiveKit becomes the default media stack, SIP.js bridge removed
  7. 1mo agoAsterisk23.4.1 security release resolves 20 advisories
  8. 1mo agoAsterisk22.10.1 takes the same 20-advisory security set
  9. 2mo agoBigBlueButton4.0 beta.3: layout system rebuilt, Unified layout becomes default
  10. 5mo agoBigBlueButton3.0.23: breakout-room fixes, security patches, renamed bbb-web properties
  11. 6mo agoBigBlueButton3.0.22: client and core fixes, security patches
  12. 6mo agoBigBlueButton3.0.21: security fixes and minor client improvements

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Asterisk and BigBlueButton?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. BigBlueButton is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Asterisk better than BigBlueButton?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. BigBlueButton is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Asterisk?

Top Asterisk alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Asterisk alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/asterisk for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to BigBlueButton?

Top BigBlueButton alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "BigBlueButton alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bigbluebutton for the full list with editorial commentary on each.