← Back to home
Comparison · Meetings

CasparCG Server vs Fourwaves

A side-by-side editorial comparison of CasparCG Server and Fourwaves — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

CasparCG Server vs Fourwaves: at a glance

FeatureCasparCG ServerFourwaves
SectorMeetingsMeetings
Velocity score0.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbroadcast, playout, hdr, ffmpegconference-management, payments, multi-event-admin, attendee-experience
Last editorial update9d ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is CasparCG Server?

Broadcast playout server reaches for HDR and sets a hardware floor to get there

CasparCG Server ships stable releases roughly once or twice a year, with long RC and beta runs ahead of each major. The 2.4 line delivered resolution and control-surface breadth — 8K and 4K DCI frames, custom resolutions, an interlaced mixer pipeline for field accuracy, AMCP command batching. The current 2.5.0 stable turns to colour and deployment: initial HDR support, ffmpeg 7.0, headless Linux operation, and Ubuntu deb packaging.

Read the full CasparCG Server trajectory →

What is Fourwaves?

Fourwaves is closing the gaps around its payments layer and its form editor at the same time.

Fourwaves publishes a near-daily, one-line changelog covering small changes to the conference organiser's admin surface. The August window is dominated by payments and money administration: transaction filtering by organisation and by payment gateway, the Free plan surfaced in the upgrade checkout, and Authorize.net added as a supported processor. The two newest entries move elsewhere — self-service account creation from the sign-in page, and a guard that blocks deleting fields, sections, or choices still referenced elsewhere in an event, with a warning naming what depends on them.

Read the full Fourwaves trajectory →

CasparCG Server vs Fourwaves: editorial side-by-side

C0.0

Broadcast playout server reaches for HDR and sets a hardware floor to get there

◆ Current state

CasparCG Server ships stable releases roughly once or twice a year, with long RC and beta runs ahead of each major. The 2.4 line delivered resolution and control-surface breadth — 8K and 4K DCI frames, custom resolutions, an interlaced mixer pipeline for field accuracy, AMCP command batching. The current 2.5.0 stable turns to colour and deployment: initial HDR support, ffmpeg 7.0, headless Linux operation, and Ubuntu deb packaging.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is modernizing the parts of a playout server that determine whether it can sit in a current broadcast chain — colour pipeline, pixel format fidelity, and where it can run. That comes with an explicit hardware bargain: AVX2 is recommended now and becomes a requirement in 2.6, trading compatibility with pre-2013 CPUs for the instruction set HDR and the embedded Chrome renderer need. Alongside, Decklink and NDI integration keep absorbing steady fix work.

◆ Prediction

2.6 should complete the AVX2 transition and widen HDR beyond the current subset of producers and consumers, since the 2.5 notes describe HDR as deliberately partial.

F
Fourwaves
MEETINGS
5.0

Fourwaves is closing the gaps around its payments layer and its form editor at the same time.

◆ Current state

Fourwaves publishes a near-daily, one-line changelog covering small changes to the conference organiser's admin surface. The August window is dominated by payments and money administration: transaction filtering by organisation and by payment gateway, the Free plan surfaced in the upgrade checkout, and Authorize.net added as a supported processor. The two newest entries move elsewhere — self-service account creation from the sign-in page, and a guard that blocks deleting fields, sections, or choices still referenced elsewhere in an event, with a warning naming what depends on them.

◆ Where it's heading

The work is aimed at multi-event organisations rather than single-conference organisers; transaction filtering and a second payment processor only matter if you run several events through shared gateways. The referential-integrity guard on form fields points at the same maturity problem from the other side — events configured deeply enough that deleting a field silently breaks something downstream, which is a complaint you only get once customers build complex forms. Individually each change is minor; together they describe a platform being made to hold more events per customer.

◆ Prediction

Expect the payments thread to continue — further gateway options or per-organisation payment configuration are the natural next step now that transactions can be filtered by gateway. The date-stamped daily format suggests the cadence holds regardless of the size of what ships.

Alternatives to CasparCG Server and Fourwaves

Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CasparCG Server or Fourwaves.

See all CasparCG Server alternatives → · See all Fourwaves alternatives →

Recent activity from CasparCG Server and Fourwaves

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoFourwavesSelf-service account creation from the sign-in page
  2. 2d agoFourwavesReferenced form fields can no longer be deleted
  3. 6d agoFourwavesAuthorize.net added as a payment processor
  4. 7d agoFourwavesFree plan shown as a card in upgrade checkout
  5. 8d agoFourwavesTracks field usable as a confirmation-email variable
  6. 9d agoFourwavesFix: Website section shown to program chairs
  7. 8mo agoCasparCG Server2.5.0 brings initial HDR, headless Linux and an AVX2 baseline
  8. 1y agoCasparCG Server2.4.3 clears crashes across FFmpeg, Decklink and HTML producers
  9. 1y agoCasparCG Server2.4.2 restores Decklink driver 14.3 compatibility
  10. 1y agoCasparCG Server2.4.1 fixes Decklink subregions, EXIF rotation and NDI source listing
  11. 2y agoCasparCG Server2.4.0 adds 8K and 4K DCI frames plus AMCP command batching
  12. 2y agoCasparCG Server2.4.0 RC1 preview of the 2.4 feature set

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between CasparCG Server and Fourwaves?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fourwaves is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is CasparCG Server better than Fourwaves?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fourwaves is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to CasparCG Server?

Top CasparCG Server alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CasparCG Server alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/casparcg-server for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Fourwaves?

Top Fourwaves alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fourwaves alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fourwaves for the full list with editorial commentary on each.