← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

checkhelper vs mdatools

A side-by-side editorial comparison of checkhelper and mdatools — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packages

checkhelper vs mdatools: at a glance

Featurecheckhelpermdatools
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-packages, cran-compliance, static-analysis, developer-toolschemometrics, spectroscopy, classification, multiway-analysis
Last editorial update1h ago44m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is checkhelper?

checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.

1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.

Read the full checkhelper trajectory →

What is mdatools?

mdatools spun out its cross-validation method, then came back for three-way data.

mdatools is a long-running chemometrics package covering PCA, PLS regression, SIMCA and DD-SIMCA classification, MCR resolution and a large spectral preprocessing framework. Its releases are infrequent and each one tends to carry one substantive idea plus a handful of fixes. The June release opens a direction the package had not previously taken: DD-SIMCA classification of three-way data, through PARAFAC and Tucker decompositions.

Read the full mdatools trajectory →

checkhelper vs mdatools: editorial side-by-side

C
checkhelper
INFRA · APIS
2.5

checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.

◆ Current state

1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.

◆ Where it's heading

The design commitment is static analysis — AST walks via getParseData(), line-by-line Rd reading, no eval() and no namespace loading — so the tool can report on a package it never runs. That commitment is what made the roxygen2 8.x break survivable: the audit pipeline itself was verified correct under 8.1.0 and only the test scaffolding had to go, now guarded by a dedicated regression test. fix_globals(write = TRUE) is being sanded down in parallel, no longer flattening per-function grouping comments or writing a degenerate empty globalVariables() shell.

◆ Prediction

The immediate move is the 1.0.1 submission itself, clearing the archival notice. Beyond that, each additional CRAN incoming-check rule remains a candidate for another audit_* function; the open question these notes still leave is whether the family ever gets a single combined entry point.

M
mdatools
INFRA · APIS
0.0

mdatools spun out its cross-validation method, then came back for three-way data.

◆ Current state

mdatools is a long-running chemometrics package covering PCA, PLS regression, SIMCA and DD-SIMCA classification, MCR resolution and a large spectral preprocessing framework. Its releases are infrequent and each one tends to carry one substantive idea plus a handful of fixes. The June release opens a direction the package had not previously taken: DD-SIMCA classification of three-way data, through PARAFAC and Tucker decompositions.

◆ Where it's heading

The shape of the package has been managed deliberately rather than allowed to sprawl. Procrustes cross-validation grew large enough to warrant its own package and was moved out to pcv in 0.14.0; preprocessing was consolidated in 0.12.0 into a composable prep() framework rather than a set of loose functions. Around that, the recurring work is numerical: a more stable SIMPLS implementation, cross-validation rewritten to accept user-supplied segment indices, prep.savgol() and prep.alsbasecorr() rewritten for speed, and now the baseline iteration default raised to match the web applications the maintainer also runs.

◆ Prediction

Three-way DD-SIMCA arrives with two decompositions and no companion regression or resolution methods for multiway data, so extending the multiway path to the rest of the toolkit is the obvious follow-up. The alignment of defaults with the maintainer's web applications suggests those two codebases will keep being reconciled.

Alternatives to checkhelper and mdatools

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either checkhelper or mdatools.

See all checkhelper alternatives → · See all mdatools alternatives →

Recent activity from checkhelper and mdatools

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agocheckhelpercheckhelper 1.0.1 rc1 (CRAN submission candidate)
  2. 1mo agomdatoolsDD-SIMCA classification arrives for three-way data
  3. 3mo agocheckhelperA static audit_* family for CRAN pre-submission checks
  4. 5mo agomdatoolsv. 0.15.0
  5. 2y agomdatoolsData frames converted to matrices automatically for model training
  6. 2y agocheckhelperTest fixes for roxygen2 changes
  7. 3y agomdatoolscv.scope lets centering and scaling follow the global or local set
  8. 3y agocheckhelpercheckhelper 0.1.0 - First CRAN Release
  9. 3y agomdatoolsProcrustes cross-validation moves out to its own pcv package
  10. 3y agomdatoolsgetRegcoeffs() fixed for unscaled models; ipls() gains a full mode

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between checkhelper and mdatools?

Both compete on the same themes — r-packages — within Infra & APIs. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is checkhelper better than mdatools?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to checkhelper?

Top checkhelper alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "checkhelper alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/checkhelper for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to mdatools?

Top mdatools alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mdatools alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mdatools for the full list with editorial commentary on each.