← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

checkhelper vs PowerTOST

A side-by-side editorial comparison of checkhelper and PowerTOST — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

checkhelper vs PowerTOST: at a glance

FeaturecheckhelperPowerTOST
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-packages, cran-compliance, static-analysis, developer-toolsbioequivalence, sample-size, regulatory, pharmacometrics
Last editorial update51m ago18h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is checkhelper?

checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.

1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.

Read the full checkhelper trajectory →

What is PowerTOST?

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

Read the full PowerTOST trajectory →

checkhelper vs PowerTOST: editorial side-by-side

C
checkhelper
INFRA · APIS
2.5

checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.

◆ Current state

1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.

◆ Where it's heading

The design commitment is static analysis — AST walks via getParseData(), line-by-line Rd reading, no eval() and no namespace loading — so the tool can report on a package it never runs. That commitment is what made the roxygen2 8.x break survivable: the audit pipeline itself was verified correct under 8.1.0 and only the test scaffolding had to go, now guarded by a dedicated regression test. fix_globals(write = TRUE) is being sanded down in parallel, no longer flattening per-function grouping comments or writing a degenerate empty globalVariables() shell.

◆ Prediction

The immediate move is the 1.0.1 submission itself, clearing the archival notice. Beyond that, each additional CRAN incoming-check rule remains a candidate for another audit_* function; the open question these notes still leave is whether the family ever gets a single combined entry point.

P
PowerTOST
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

◆ Current state

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is in long maintenance with a widening regulatory surface: the statistical methods are settled, and releases arrive when an agency publishes a framework that can be expressed as a settings variant of an existing method. Function naming has been deliberately decoupled from any single agency, with the deprecated FDA-suffixed aliases carried for years before removal. Cadence has slowed to roughly one release every eighteen months.

◆ Prediction

The next release is most likely another regulator setting or a small fix; on the deprecation notice already given, the power.NTIDFDA()-style aliases are the obvious removal candidate.

Alternatives to checkhelper and PowerTOST

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either checkhelper or PowerTOST.

See all checkhelper alternatives → · See all PowerTOST alternatives →

Recent activity from checkhelper and PowerTOST

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agocheckhelpercheckhelper 1.0.1 rc1 (CRAN submission candidate)
  2. 3mo agocheckhelperA static audit_* family for CRAN pre-submission checks
  3. 10mo agoPowerTOSTFix for splitting total sample size across sequences
  4. 2y agoPowerTOSTNTID functions renamed off the FDA acronym; GCC guidance in vignettes
  5. 2y agocheckhelperTest fixes for roxygen2 changes
  6. 3y agocheckhelpercheckhelper 0.1.0 - First CRAN Release
  7. 4y agoPowerTOSTpower.NTID() aliases added; FDA-suffixed names deprecated
  8. 5y agoPowerTOSTGulf Co-operation Council added as a regulator setting
  9. 5y agoPowerTOSTMaintenance release with vignette and documentation clarifications
  10. 5y agoPowerTOSTstringsAsFactors fix for older R in a vignette example

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between checkhelper and PowerTOST?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is checkhelper better than PowerTOST?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to checkhelper?

Top checkhelper alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "checkhelper alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/checkhelper for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to PowerTOST?

Top PowerTOST alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PowerTOST alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/powertost for the full list with editorial commentary on each.