← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

cofad vs logbin

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cofad and logbin — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

cofad vs logbin: at a glance

Featurecofadlogbin
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescontrast-analysis, factorial-designs, shiny, psychology-methodsrelative-risk, log-binomial, glm-compatibility, em-algorithm
Last editorial update2h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cofad?

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

Read the full cofad trajectory →

What is logbin?

Relative-risk regression that converges where glm fails, under an unreadable tag order

logbin fits log-binomial models to estimate relative risk, a fit standard glm frequently fails to converge on because of the constrained parameter space. Its answer is a choice of algorithms — adaptive barrier, combinatorial EM, and expectation-maximisation on an overparameterised model — selected through a method argument and optionally accelerated with turboEM. The most recent release, in April 2025, replaces the variance-covariance calculation in summary.logbin so it matches summary.glm, and adds a testthat suite.

Read the full logbin trajectory →

cofad vs logbin: editorial side-by-side

C
cofad
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

◆ Current state

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and correctness-led. The record runs from a JOSS publication in 2021 through a near three-year gap to a release that both extended the method and repaired the GUI, then a degrees-of-freedom fix. Maintainer and author order changed in 0.3.0, which typically marks a handover rather than a burst of new work, and the cadence since is consistent with that.

◆ Prediction

Expect low-frequency correctness releases; the competing contrast analysis helper added in 0.3.0 is the most likely thing to be extended if anything is.

L
logbin
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Relative-risk regression that converges where glm fails, under an unreadable tag order

◆ Current state

logbin fits log-binomial models to estimate relative risk, a fit standard glm frequently fails to converge on because of the constrained parameter space. Its answer is a choice of algorithms — adaptive barrier, combinatorial EM, and expectation-maximisation on an overparameterised model — selected through a method argument and optionally accelerated with turboEM. The most recent release, in April 2025, replaces the variance-covariance calculation in summary.logbin so it matches summary.glm, and adds a testthat suite.

◆ Where it's heading

The method work concluded in 2021 and the package has since been aligned with base R conventions rather than extended: the vcov calculation now mirrors glm's, and earlier releases added the contrasts, qr, R and effects components so standard glm S3 methods such as influence() and plot() work on logbin objects. Be warned that the feed's tag order is unusable — versions 2.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2 and 2.0.4 were all pushed within ninety seconds on 23 July 2021 in non-monotonic order, while 2.0.3 carries a 2017 timestamp and restates 2.0.2's notes. Read the bodies, not the sequence.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued alignment with glm conventions and occasional CRAN maintenance; the algorithm set has been stable for four years and nothing in these entries suggests another is planned.

Alternatives to cofad and logbin

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cofad or logbin.

See all cofad alternatives → · See all logbin alternatives →

Recent activity from cofad and logbin

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agocofadDegrees of freedom corrected in the t-test table
  2. 1y agologbinvcov in summary.logbin now matches summary.glm
  3. 2y agocofadCompeting contrast helper, rebuilt Shiny GUI, maintainer change
  4. 4y agocofadDocumentation and references for JOSS publication
  5. 4y agocofadShiny GUI added; aggregated-data function and 0-variance fix
  6. 5y agologbinFactor reparameterisation fix and faster parameter expansion
  7. 5y agologbinVersion bump to satisfy a CRAN check
  8. 5y agologbinmethod and accelerate options: adaptive barrier, CEM, EM, turboEM
  9. 5y agologbinglm S3 method support via contrasts, qr, R and effects components
  10. 5y agologbinJournal of Statistical Software citation added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cofad and logbin?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cofad and logbin are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cofad better than logbin?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cofad and logbin are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cofad?

Top cofad alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cofad alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cofad for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to logbin?

Top logbin alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "logbin alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/logbin for the full list with editorial commentary on each.