← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

cofad vs MIC

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cofad and MIC — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

cofad vs MIC: at a glance

FeaturecofadMIC
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescontrast-analysis, factorial-designs, shiny, psychology-methodsantimicrobial-resistance, clinical-microbiology, censored-data, method-validation
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cofad?

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

Read the full cofad trajectory →

What is MIC?

An antimicrobial testing package cut its genomic half loose to become one thing well.

MIC analyses and validates antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration data. Version 2.0.0 removed every genomic function and ported them to a separate package, faLearn, leaving MIC focused on concentration analysis and method validation. The result needs fewer dependencies and no longer requires compilation, which is a meaningful install-time change for a clinical microbiology audience.

Read the full MIC trajectory →

cofad vs MIC: editorial side-by-side

C
cofad
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

◆ Current state

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and correctness-led. The record runs from a JOSS publication in 2021 through a near three-year gap to a release that both extended the method and repaired the GUI, then a degrees-of-freedom fix. Maintainer and author order changed in 0.3.0, which typically marks a handover rather than a burst of new work, and the cadence since is consistent with that.

◆ Prediction

Expect low-frequency correctness releases; the competing contrast analysis helper added in 0.3.0 is the most likely thing to be extended if anything is.

M
MIC
INFRA · APIS
0.0

An antimicrobial testing package cut its genomic half loose to become one thing well.

◆ Current state

MIC analyses and validates antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration data. Version 2.0.0 removed every genomic function and ported them to a separate package, faLearn, leaving MIC focused on concentration analysis and method validation. The result needs fewer dependencies and no longer requires compilation, which is a meaningful install-time change for a clinical microbiology audience.

◆ Where it's heading

The split was announced a release before it happened, with the genomic functions deprecated in 1.2.0 and the destination named. Around that, the substantive work has been on censoring: MIC values are reported with inequality signs, and 1.1.0 then 1.2.0 built out increasingly precise handling of them, separating less-than-or-equal from strictly-less-than and adding tolerance arguments to the comparison and agreement functions. That is the package's real subject matter, and shedding the genomic code is what makes room for it.

◆ Prediction

With the scope settled, expect continued work on validation semantics and on the AMR package interoperability the notes already track. The relationship between MIC and faLearn is the thing to watch, since users of the removed functions now have to install both.

Alternatives to cofad and MIC

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cofad or MIC.

See all cofad alternatives → · See all MIC alternatives →

Recent activity from cofad and MIC

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 8mo agoMICGenomic functions removed and ported to faLearn
  2. 9mo agoMICGenomic functions deprecated; censoring distinguishes leq and geq
  3. 1y agoMICessential_agreement rebuilt around explicit censoring control
  4. 1y agocofadDegrees of freedom corrected in the t-test table
  5. 2y agocofadCompeting contrast helper, rebuilt Shiny GUI, maintainer change
  6. 4y agocofadDocumentation and references for JOSS publication
  7. 4y agocofadShiny GUI added; aggregated-data function and 0-variance fix

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cofad and MIC?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cofad and MIC are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cofad better than MIC?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cofad and MIC are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cofad?

Top cofad alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cofad alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cofad for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to MIC?

Top MIC alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "MIC alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mic for the full list with editorial commentary on each.