mice
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
dscore vs selection.index
A side-by-side editorial comparison of dscore and selection.index — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:breaking-changes
dscore vs selection.index: at a glance
What is dscore?
The D-score reference implementation rebuilt its measurement foundation on seven countries.
dscore computes the D-score and DAZ, the GSED developmental measurement used in child-health research, and it is the reference implementation rather than one option among several. The package is at 2.1.0 after a dense 2025: the default key moved from three-country to seven-country validation data, the licence moved from AGPL to Apache 2.0, and the 2.1.0 line added per-country references, full BSID-III coverage and domain-level scoring. Breaking changes are routine here and always come with a documented fallback key or algorithm argument.
What is selection.index?
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.
dscore vs selection.index: editorial side-by-side
dscore
0.0INFRA · APIS
The D-score reference implementation rebuilt its measurement foundation on seven countries.
◆ Current state
dscore computes the D-score and DAZ, the GSED developmental measurement used in child-health research, and it is the reference implementation rather than one option among several. The package is at 2.1.0 after a dense 2025: the default key moved from three-country to seven-country validation data, the licence moved from AGPL to Apache 2.0, and the 2.1.0 line added per-country references, full BSID-III coverage and domain-level scoring. Breaking changes are routine here and always come with a documented fallback key or algorithm argument.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc runs from correcting the instrument to broadening who can use it. The 2020-2024 releases were item-table repair and error correction, including a scale-factor bug that altered published standard errors; from 1.11.0 onward the work is distribution — a permissive licence, more instruments mapped in, and references resolved per country rather than pooled. That combination points at national-survey and app-embedded use rather than research-only use.
◆ Prediction
The 2.0.0 notes state that groundwork was laid for extending D-scores to older children, and 2.0.0 still tells users to fall back to gsed2406 for instruments outside GSED SF and LF. Expect the next releases to close that gap by mapping more instruments into gsed2510, with the older-age extension the likeliest headline feature.
selection.index
0.0INFRA · APIS
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
◆ Current state
selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.
◆ Where it's heading
The first version series added one function at a time — combinatorial indices, then genetic advance, then mean performance under randomised block designs — against a fixed phenotypic framing. Version 2.0.0 abandons that framing rather than extending it. Genomic and marker information become inputs the package understands, multi-cycle simulation becomes a built-in toolset, and the old combinatorial entry points are replaced by a named lpsi(). The 2.0.1 follow-up is entirely CI and numerical-stability work, which reads like a maintainer bracing a much larger surface.
◆ Prediction
A seventeen-runner CI matrix mirroring every CRAN check flavour, added days after 2.0.0, says the immediate concern is keeping a compiled multi-family package green rather than adding to it. Expect stabilisation releases before anything new.
Alternatives to dscore and selection.index
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either dscore or selection.index.
PINstimation
A market-microstructure toolkit that keeps adding estimators as the papers land.
nzilbb.vowels
A vowel-analysis package trimming dependencies after an email address got it archived.
emuR
The R half of the EMU speech database system, fixing what was quietly broken.
BAS
A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.
tidyplots
tidyplots keeps rebuilding its own foundations rather than layering around them.
See all dscore alternatives → · See all selection.index alternatives →
Recent activity from dscore and selection.index
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5mo agoselection.indexCI expanded to 17 runners after the 2.0.0 rewrite
- 5mo agoselection.indexGenomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core ⚡
- 6mo agoselection.indexUnspecified general performance improvements
- 7mo agodscoredscore 2.1.0
- 10mo agodscoredscore 2.0.0 ⚡
- 10mo agodscoredscore 1.11.0 ⚡
- 1y agodscoredscore 1.10.0
- 2y agodscoredscore 1.9.0
- 2y agoselection.indexMean performance for randomised block designs
- 3y agodscoredscore 1.7.0
- 3y agoselection.indexsel.index() and sel.score.rank() removed for comb.indices()
- 4y agoselection.indexGenetic advance calculation added
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between dscore and selection.index?
Both compete on the same themes — breaking-changes — within Infra & APIs. dscore and selection.index are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is dscore better than selection.index?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. dscore and selection.index are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to dscore?
Top dscore alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "dscore alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dscore for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to selection.index?
Top selection.index alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "selection.index alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/selection-index for the full list with editorial commentary on each.