← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

formr vs GeoThinneR

A side-by-side editorial comparison of formr and GeoThinneR — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

formr vs GeoThinneR: at a glance

FeatureformrGeoThinneR
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvey-research, rest-api, cran-release, opencpuspatial-thinning, species-distribution, occurrence-data, breaking-changes
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is formr?

formr's R client reached CRAN and moved its recommended path to the v1 REST API.

formr is the R-side client for formr.org, the open study framework used to run longitudinal and experience-sampling questionnaires. In May it reached CRAN for the first time, released in step with formr.org server v1.0.0, and the formr_api_* family built on the server's RESTful surface became the supported entry point. The three releases since have been repair work on the paths that move rendered output and API results.

Read the full formr trajectory →

What is GeoThinneR?

Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it

GeoThinneR removes spatially redundant occurrence records before species distribution modelling. Version 2.0.0 restructured it around a GeoThinned S3 class with print, summary, plot and trial-accessor methods, replacing the bare logical vectors earlier versions returned, and reorganised the methods into three named strategies — distance, grid and precision — with the search algorithm as a separate argument. The two releases since have added a priority system for choosing which of several tied points to drop.

Read the full GeoThinneR trajectory →

formr vs GeoThinneR: editorial side-by-side

F
formr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

formr's R client reached CRAN and moved its recommended path to the v1 REST API.

◆ Current state

formr is the R-side client for formr.org, the open study framework used to run longitudinal and experience-sampling questionnaires. In May it reached CRAN for the first time, released in step with formr.org server v1.0.0, and the formr_api_* family built on the server's RESTful surface became the supported entry point. The three releases since have been repair work on the paths that move rendered output and API results.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is consolidation around the v1 API while the legacy Classic path is left running but demoted in the vignette. The complication is that CRAN's requirements and the OpenCPU server's requirements pull against each other: CRAN review pushed rendering into tempdir() with random filenames, which broke rforms.org because the server fetches a fixed knit.html, and 1.1.2 had to put it back. The 1.2.0 note describes the same write-directory problem being solved in an OpenCPU-aware way rather than reverted, alongside making dependencies installable under WASM.

◆ Prediction

Two of the last three releases were regressions in the render path, so the OpenCPU-aware write directory in 1.2.0 is the change most likely to need follow-up. The Classic formr_results() path remains in the package with no removal date announced, and nothing in these entries indicates when that ends.

G
GeoThinneR
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it

◆ Current state

GeoThinneR removes spatially redundant occurrence records before species distribution modelling. Version 2.0.0 restructured it around a GeoThinned S3 class with print, summary, plot and trial-accessor methods, replacing the bare logical vectors earlier versions returned, and reorganised the methods into three named strategies — distance, grid and precision — with the search algorithm as a separate argument. The two releases since have added a priority system for choosing which of several tied points to drop.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from a function that returns an answer to a tool that returns something you can interrogate. Multiple thinning trials are first-class — you can ask for the largest, fetch a specific one, summarise one — and the recent work is about making the choice among tied candidates controllable rather than random. Dependency discipline runs alongside: the R-tree method was dropped when its package was not on CRAN, and spatial coverage degrades to NA rather than failing when s2 is missing.

◆ Prediction

The priority mechanism now covers all three strategies and the last release was an overflow fix in the local kd-tree path at large sizes, so scale is where the pressure is. More work on the distance methods at large N is the likelier next step than another strategy.

Alternatives to formr and GeoThinneR

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either formr or GeoThinneR.

See all formr alternatives → · See all GeoThinneR alternatives →

Recent activity from formr and GeoThinneR

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoformrOpenCPU-aware render directory and WASM-installable dependencies
  2. 2mo agoformrHotfix: rendered output returns to knit.html
  3. 2mo agoformrcalculate items no longer coerced to NA by as.numeric()
  4. 2mo agoformrv1.0.0 — first CRAN release
  5. 5mo agoGeoThinneRInteger overflow in local kd-tree grid assignment
  6. 8mo agoGeoThinneRPriority-based tie-breaking across all thinning methods
  7. 1y agoGeoThinneRGeoThinned result objects and a reorganised method surface
  8. 1y agoGeoThinneRR-tree thinning removed with its off-CRAN dependency

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between formr and GeoThinneR?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. formr and GeoThinneR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is formr better than GeoThinneR?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. formr and GeoThinneR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to formr?

Top formr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "formr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/formr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to GeoThinneR?

Top GeoThinneR alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "GeoThinneR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/geothinner for the full list with editorial commentary on each.