← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

formr vs surveycore

A side-by-side editorial comparison of formr and surveycore — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packages

formr vs surveycore: at a glance

Featureformrsurveycore
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvey-research, rest-api, cran-release, opencpusurvey-statistics, variance-estimation, replicate-weights, api-stability
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is formr?

formr's R client reached CRAN and moved its recommended path to the v1 REST API.

formr is the R-side client for formr.org, the open study framework used to run longitudinal and experience-sampling questionnaires. In May it reached CRAN for the first time, released in step with formr.org server v1.0.0, and the formr_api_* family built on the server's RESTful surface became the supported entry point. The three releases since have been repair work on the paths that move rendered output and API results.

Read the full formr trajectory →

What is surveycore?

surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.

surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.

Read the full surveycore trajectory →

formr vs surveycore: editorial side-by-side

F
formr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

formr's R client reached CRAN and moved its recommended path to the v1 REST API.

◆ Current state

formr is the R-side client for formr.org, the open study framework used to run longitudinal and experience-sampling questionnaires. In May it reached CRAN for the first time, released in step with formr.org server v1.0.0, and the formr_api_* family built on the server's RESTful surface became the supported entry point. The three releases since have been repair work on the paths that move rendered output and API results.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is consolidation around the v1 API while the legacy Classic path is left running but demoted in the vignette. The complication is that CRAN's requirements and the OpenCPU server's requirements pull against each other: CRAN review pushed rendering into tempdir() with random filenames, which broke rforms.org because the server fetches a fixed knit.html, and 1.1.2 had to put it back. The 1.2.0 note describes the same write-directory problem being solved in an OpenCPU-aware way rather than reverted, alongside making dependencies installable under WASM.

◆ Prediction

Two of the last three releases were regressions in the render path, so the OpenCPU-aware write directory in 1.2.0 is the change most likely to need follow-up. The Classic formr_results() path remains in the package with no removal date announced, and nothing in these entries indicates when that ends.

S
surveycore
INFRA · APIS
0.0

surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.

◆ Current state

surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.

◆ Where it's heading

The last months before 1.0.0 were spent making the awkward designs behave like the ordinary ones. Non-probability designs gained jackknife replicate schemes and got their bootstrap repweights routed through the replicate-weight variance estimator in survey_glm(), matching every other estimation function. The survey_collection abstraction — several surveys treated as one pseudo-data-frame — was tightened rather than extended: divergent grouping across members now errors instead of stitching a patchwork with bind_rows(), and the missing-variable argument was renamed and given a stored default on the collection itself. A documentation audit before 1.0.0 turned up six dispatch and print bugs and corrections across forty-plus files, which is the kind of thing that surfaces when an API is being frozen rather than extended.

◆ Prediction

A declared-stable API means the next releases should be additive or corrective rather than breaking, and the pre-1.0.0 pattern of breaking renames should stop. The tight version pinning between the two packages means surveytidy releases will keep following surveycore's.

Alternatives to formr and surveycore

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either formr or surveycore.

See all formr alternatives → · See all surveycore alternatives →

Recent activity from formr and surveycore

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoformrOpenCPU-aware render directory and WASM-installable dependencies
  2. 2mo agoformrHotfix: rendered output returns to knit.html
  3. 2mo agoformrcalculate items no longer coerced to NA by as.numeric()
  4. 2mo agosurveycoreFirst stable release: all four survey design types complete
  5. 2mo agoformrv1.0.0 — first CRAN release
  6. 3mo agosurveycoreget_effective_n() computes effective sample size
  7. 3mo agosurveycoreCollections error on divergent grouping; .on_missing renamed
  8. 4mo agosurveycoreCRAN patch removing surveytidy from the vignette

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between formr and surveycore?

Both compete on the same themes — r-packages — within Infra & APIs. formr and surveycore are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is formr better than surveycore?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. formr and surveycore are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to formr?

Top formr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "formr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/formr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to surveycore?

Top surveycore alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveycore alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveycore for the full list with editorial commentary on each.