← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

ggfootball vs multimark

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggfootball and multimark — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ggfootball vs multimark: at a glance

Featureggfootballmultimark
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessports-analytics, r-package, data-scraping, expected-goalscapture-recapture, mcmc, maintenance, cran
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ggfootball?

A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.

ggfootball is a small R package for plotting expected-goals and shot data, sourced from Understat. Four releases are visible. The 0.2.x line was argument tidying and dependency pruning; 0.3.0 replaced the data-acquisition layer wholesale, moving get_match_shots() from HTML parsing onto Understat's AJAX endpoints and changing the returned column names in the process.

Read the full ggfootball trajectory →

What is multimark?

Five years of compiler and CRAN fixes on a capture-recapture package.

multimark fits capture-mark-recapture models for populations sampled with multiple non-invasive marks, including a spatial variant. Nothing in the visible history changes the models. Every recent release responds to something outside the package: a CRAN check, a compiler flag, or an upstream package that stopped exporting a function.

Read the full multimark trajectory →

ggfootball vs multimark: editorial side-by-side

G
ggfootball
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.

◆ Current state

ggfootball is a small R package for plotting expected-goals and shot data, sourced from Understat. Four releases are visible. The 0.2.x line was argument tidying and dependency pruning; 0.3.0 replaced the data-acquisition layer wholesale, moving get_match_shots() from HTML parsing onto Understat's AJAX endpoints and changing the returned column names in the process.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is away from scraped HTML and toward a thinner, more defensible package: four dependencies dropped in 0.3.0 on top of qdapRegex in 0.2.1, input validation added, error messages rewritten. Both breaking changes so far were accepted rather than deferred, which reads as a maintainer treating pre-1.0 as the window to get the shape right. The package is willing to break callers for structural reasons, not cosmetic ones.

◆ Prediction

With the scraper rebuilt and the dependency surface trimmed, the next releases are likely to stabilise the new column names and extend the plotting side, which has seen nothing since 0.2.0. A 1.0 would be the signal that the data structure is now considered fixed.

M
multimark
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Five years of compiler and CRAN fixes on a capture-recapture package.

◆ Current state

multimark fits capture-mark-recapture models for populations sampled with multiple non-invasive marks, including a spatial variant. Nothing in the visible history changes the models. Every recent release responds to something outside the package: a CRAN check, a compiler flag, or an upstream package that stopped exporting a function.

◆ Where it's heading

This is preservation rather than development. The one substantive entry, in 2021, corrected an MCMC error in multimarkClosedSCR() serious enough that the author told users to revisit past analyses; everything since has been keeping the C code compiling across platforms. Release intervals now stretch to years.

◆ Prediction

Expect the pattern to hold, with a release whenever a toolchain or upstream dependency forces one and no change to the samplers.

Alternatives to ggfootball and multimark

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggfootball or multimark.

See all ggfootball alternatives → · See all multimark alternatives →

Recent activity from ggfootball and multimark

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agoggfootballggfootball 0.3.0
  2. 6mo agoggfootballggfootball 0.2.2
  3. 8mo agomultimarkBrobdingnag sum import dropped after upstream removal
  4. 1y agoggfootballggfootball 0.2.1
  5. 1y agoggfootballggfootball 0.2.0
  6. 3y agomultimarkr-devel error fixed at CRAN's request
  7. 3y agomultimarkLinux compilation warnings cleared
  8. 4y agomultimarkFedora build error fixed at CRAN's request
  9. 4y agomultimarkMCMC detection-probability bug fixed in multimarkClosedSCR()
  10. 4y agomultimarkUnused parallelism dependencies removed

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ggfootball and multimark?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggfootball and multimark are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ggfootball better than multimark?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggfootball and multimark are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ggfootball?

Top ggfootball alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggfootball alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggfootball for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to multimark?

Top multimark alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "multimark alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/multimark for the full list with editorial commentary on each.