mice
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
ggfootball vs writeAlizer
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggfootball and writeAlizer — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
ggfootball vs writeAlizer: at a glance
What is ggfootball?
A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.
ggfootball is a small R package for plotting expected-goals and shot data, sourced from Understat. Four releases are visible. The 0.2.x line was argument tidying and dependency pruning; 0.3.0 replaced the data-acquisition layer wholesale, moving get_match_shots() from HTML parsing onto Understat's AJAX endpoints and changing the returned column names in the process.
What is writeAlizer?
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
writeAlizer generates predicted writing-quality scores from features produced by Coh-Metrix, ReaderBench and GAMET, downloading its trained scoring models on demand. Every release in this window — nine of them between September 2025 and February 2026 — is about that download path rather than the scoring: classed error conditions, checksum verification, an offline mode, a mockable artifact directory, and dependency reporting for the model families a user actually invokes.
ggfootball vs writeAlizer: editorial side-by-side
ggfootball
0.0INFRA · APIS
A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.
◆ Current state
ggfootball is a small R package for plotting expected-goals and shot data, sourced from Understat. Four releases are visible. The 0.2.x line was argument tidying and dependency pruning; 0.3.0 replaced the data-acquisition layer wholesale, moving get_match_shots() from HTML parsing onto Understat's AJAX endpoints and changing the returned column names in the process.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is away from scraped HTML and toward a thinner, more defensible package: four dependencies dropped in 0.3.0 on top of qdapRegex in 0.2.1, input validation added, error messages rewritten. Both breaking changes so far were accepted rather than deferred, which reads as a maintainer treating pre-1.0 as the window to get the shape right. The package is willing to break callers for structural reasons, not cosmetic ones.
◆ Prediction
With the scraper rebuilt and the dependency surface trimmed, the next releases are likely to stabilise the new column names and extend the plotting side, which has seen nothing since 0.2.0. A 1.0 would be the signal that the data structure is now considered fixed.
writeAlizer
0.0INFRA · APIS
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
◆ Current state
writeAlizer generates predicted writing-quality scores from features produced by Coh-Metrix, ReaderBench and GAMET, downloading its trained scoring models on demand. Every release in this window — nine of them between September 2025 and February 2026 — is about that download path rather than the scoring: classed error conditions, checksum verification, an offline mode, a mockable artifact directory, and dependency reporting for the model families a user actually invokes.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is being made safe to distribute. CRAN's policy on packages that reach the internet drove the first wave — graceful failure, tests that preflight their URLs and skip, examples seeded from a local mock model — and 1.7.0 turned the accumulated fixes into structure with named error classes for each failure mode. Only 1.7.2 adds anything a user would ask for: filename handling for Coh-Metrix and GAMET outputs that arrive as paths.
◆ Prediction
With the artifact registry hardened and documented, the pressure that produced nine releases in six months should ease, and attention can return to the models themselves — the vignette on scoring-model development added in 1.7.2 hints at that. Nothing here promises new models.
Alternatives to ggfootball and writeAlizer
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggfootball or writeAlizer.
PINstimation
A market-microstructure toolkit that keeps adding estimators as the papers land.
nzilbb.vowels
A vowel-analysis package trimming dependencies after an email address got it archived.
emuR
The R half of the EMU speech database system, fixing what was quietly broken.
BAS
A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.
tidyplots
tidyplots keeps rebuilding its own foundations rather than layering around them.
See all ggfootball alternatives → · See all writeAlizer alternatives →
Recent activity from ggfootball and writeAlizer
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 6mo agowriteAlizerOne example rewrapped to silence a CRAN check note
- 6mo agoggfootballggfootball 0.3.0 ⚡
- 6mo agoggfootballggfootball 0.2.2
- 8mo agowriteAlizerFilename stems recovered from Coh-Metrix and GAMET paths
- 10mo agowriteAlizerOffline example guard, declared as no API change
- 10mo agowriteAlizerNamed error classes for every model-download failure mode
- 10mo agowriteAlizerNetwork failures degrade gracefully under CRAN policy
- 11mo agowriteAlizerwa_seed_example_models() exported and documented
- 1y agoggfootballggfootball 0.2.1
- 1y agoggfootballggfootball 0.2.0
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between ggfootball and writeAlizer?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggfootball and writeAlizer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is ggfootball better than writeAlizer?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggfootball and writeAlizer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to ggfootball?
Top ggfootball alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggfootball alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggfootball for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to writeAlizer?
Top writeAlizer alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "writeAlizer alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/writealizer for the full list with editorial commentary on each.