← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

inlabru vs pakret

A side-by-side editorial comparison of inlabru and pakret — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

inlabru vs pakret: at a glance

Featureinlabrupakret
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian-modelling, spatial-statistics, r-package, api-consolidationreproducible-documents, citations, bibtex, quarto
Last editorial update46m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is inlabru?

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

Read the full inlabru trajectory →

What is pakret?

Package citation for R documents, quietly growing to meet Quarto.

pakret inserts citations for R packages into R Markdown and Quarto documents, resolving each package to a BibTeX entry and writing the .bib file that backs it. Version 0.3.1 adds support for Quarto's inline syntax and separator control when citing several packages in one inline chunk, following 0.3.0, which made the package create missing .bib files, preserve capitalisation in reference titles, and treat the version placeholder in citation templates as optional. Cadence is a handful of small releases a year.

Read the full pakret trajectory →

inlabru vs pakret: editorial side-by-side

I
inlabru
INFRA · APIS
2.5

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

◆ Current state

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc is consolidation of the extension surface rather than expansion of the model catalogue. Every release adds mappers or families with one hand and removes a dependency, a re-export or a deprecated path with the other — plyr in 2.15.0, fmesher's Depends entry in 2.14.1, sp and ggmap in 2.12.0. The compatibility flag bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable and the temporary fm_int/fm_pixels re-exports show a maintainer sequencing breaks across releases instead of landing them together.

◆ Prediction

The 2.14 compatibility flag is still defaulting to TRUE and the fmesher re-exports are described in the entries as temporary, so the next obvious move is a release that flips bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable off and drops those re-exports.

P
pakret
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Package citation for R documents, quietly growing to meet Quarto.

◆ Current state

pakret inserts citations for R packages into R Markdown and Quarto documents, resolving each package to a BibTeX entry and writing the .bib file that backs it. Version 0.3.1 adds support for Quarto's inline syntax and separator control when citing several packages in one inline chunk, following 0.3.0, which made the package create missing .bib files, preserve capitalisation in reference titles, and treat the version placeholder in citation templates as optional. Cadence is a handful of small releases a year.

◆ Where it's heading

Every release in this window removes a specific friction someone hit while writing a document. Bib files that had to exist beforehand now get created; single-letter package names like R and C stopped being lower-cased in titles; the package works when loaded after conflicted; citing many packages got faster; and version numbers became optional for documents where they are noise. The 0.3.1 Quarto support extends the same idea to the format its users are moving to. Nothing here is architectural, and nothing needs to be.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued alignment with Quarto as more of its syntax surfaces become relevant, and further refinement of how multi-reference packages resolve to a single entry, which the BibTeX type priority work in 0.2.0 started. The entries give no indication of a 1.0.

Alternatives to inlabru and pakret

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either inlabru or pakret.

See all inlabru alternatives → · See all pakret alternatives →

Recent activity from inlabru and pakret

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 23d agoinlabruPredictor linearisation rewritten; broom tidiers, truncated families
  2. 3mo agoinlabruBugfix release: factor contrasts, raster extraction, error classes
  3. 4mo agopakretQuarto inline syntax supported; list separators configurable
  4. 5mo agoinlabruNew mappers, standardised cgeneric support, bru_obs storage refactor
  5. 8mo agopakretMissing .bib files created; capitalisation preserved
  6. 1y agoinlabruMapper classes shortened to bm_*, experimental predictor aggregation
  7. 1y agoinlabruDrops sp and ggmap for an sf-native spatial stack
  8. 1y agopakretMultiple .bib files supported within one document
  9. 1y agopakretCitations with pre-written keys now supported
  10. 1y agopakretbook entries used when no manual entry exists

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between inlabru and pakret?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is inlabru better than pakret?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to inlabru?

Top inlabru alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inlabru alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inlabru for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to pakret?

Top pakret alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "pakret alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/pakret for the full list with editorial commentary on each.