← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

intsurv vs silx

A side-by-side editorial comparison of intsurv and silx — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

intsurv vs silx: at a glance

Featureintsurvsilx
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvival-analysis, cure-models, censored-data, regularizationscientific-computing, data-visualization, synchrotron, qt
Last editorial update1d ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is intsurv?

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

Read the full intsurv trajectory →

What is silx?

silx settles into maintenance a release after its PySide6 migration

silx is in the quiet phase after a generational release. 3.1.1 is a single fix to FitWidget loading a fit function from file. The release before it, 3.1.0, was the first real feature work since the migration - asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, and dark-theme icons - and 3.0.1 was similarly small. The 3.0.0 cut that reset the Qt binding and Python floor still defines what the line is doing.

Read the full silx trajectory →

intsurv vs silx: editorial side-by-side

I
intsurv
ANALYTICS
0.0

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

◆ Current state

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has reached the point where the methods are settled and the remaining work is ergonomics. Moving control parameters, M-step settings and penalty specification into cox_cure.control(), cox_cure.mstep() and cox_cure_net.penalty() follows the established R convention of separating tuning from the model formula, and it arrives long after the arguments accumulated. The C++ headers were placed in inst/include as early as 2019 so other packages could link against them, which suggests the implementation was always intended to be reused.

◆ Prediction

The gap between 0.2.2 and 0.3.0 makes cadence a poor basis for prediction. What the entries do support is that the interface rework is unfinished business rather than a prelude to new methods, so consolidation around the new helper functions is the likelier next step.

S
silx
ANALYTICS
5.0

silx settles into maintenance a release after its PySide6 migration

◆ Current state

silx is in the quiet phase after a generational release. 3.1.1 is a single fix to FitWidget loading a fit function from file. The release before it, 3.1.0, was the first real feature work since the migration - asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, and dark-theme icons - and 3.0.1 was similarly small. The 3.0.0 cut that reset the Qt binding and Python floor still defines what the line is doing.

◆ Where it's heading

The cadence has slowed markedly since April, and the content has shifted from structural change to plotting and colormap refinement. That is the expected shape after a binding migration: downstream beamline code needs a stable target, so the project trades feature velocity for a quiet surface. The gap between 3.0.1 in May and 3.1.0 in August is the clearest signal of the deliberate slowdown.

◆ Prediction

Expect further point releases servicing the plotting and fitting widgets rather than another structural change, with feature work continuing to arrive in the 3.1.x minors rather than patches.

Alternatives to intsurv and silx

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either intsurv or silx.

See all intsurv alternatives → · See all silx alternatives →

Recent activity from intsurv and silx

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6h agosilxFitWidget fix for loading a fit function from file
  2. 9d agosilx3.1.0: asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, dark-theme icons
  3. 3mo agosilx3.0.1: silx view fails to disable HDF5 file locking
  4. 3mo agosilx3.0.0: PySide6 becomes the default Qt binding, Python 3.10 required
  5. 3mo agosilx3.0.0rc1: release candidate for the PySide6 migration
  6. 10mo agointsurvModel configuration moves into dedicated control functions
  7. 1y agosilx2.2.2: plot axes limits, OpenGL axes and libhdf5 1.14 fixes
  8. 5y agointsurvCross-validated model selection and offset terms added
  9. 6y agointsurvC++ headers relocated so other packages can link them
  10. 7y agointsurvCox cure models for uncertain event status arrive
  11. 7y agointsurvParameter initialization methods added to the alpha
  12. 7y agointsurvAlpha cut for paper submission and simulation reproducibility

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between intsurv and silx?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. silx is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is intsurv better than silx?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. silx is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to intsurv?

Top intsurv alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "intsurv alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/intsurv for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to silx?

Top silx alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "silx alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/silx for the full list with editorial commentary on each.