mice
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ipeaplot and writeAlizer — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
An institutional chart theme whose recent releases are all vignette repair.
ipeaplot supplies Ipea's house style to ggplot2 — theme_ipea(), matching colour and fill scales, and export helpers that write the formats the institute's publications need. The feature line has been quiet since October, when save_ipeaplot() consolidated the format-specific savers. Both July releases exist to get the package building again, not to change it.
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
writeAlizer generates predicted writing-quality scores from features produced by Coh-Metrix, ReaderBench and GAMET, downloading its trained scoring models on demand. Every release in this window — nine of them between September 2025 and February 2026 — is about that download path rather than the scoring: classed error conditions, checksum verification, an offline mode, a mockable artifact directory, and dependency reporting for the model families a user actually invokes.
ipeaplot supplies Ipea's house style to ggplot2 — theme_ipea(), matching colour and fill scales, and export helpers that write the formats the institute's publications need. The feature line has been quiet since October, when save_ipeaplot() consolidated the format-specific savers. Both July releases exist to get the package building again, not to change it.
The package has been converging on a smaller, more uniform surface: separate save_eps() and save_pdf() helpers gave way to one save_ipeaplot() covering vector and raster formats with sensible defaults, and the Frutiger font dependency was dropped for a default sans-serif. What consumes releases now is downstream breakage — two consecutive patches in ten days, the second traced to geobr, both in vignettes rather than package code.
The palette line has grown one colour set at a time and is the most likely place for the next addition, but nothing in these entries commits to it. On current evidence the near term is more compatibility patching against the geobr and ggplot2 packages the vignettes depend on.
writeAlizer generates predicted writing-quality scores from features produced by Coh-Metrix, ReaderBench and GAMET, downloading its trained scoring models on demand. Every release in this window — nine of them between September 2025 and February 2026 — is about that download path rather than the scoring: classed error conditions, checksum verification, an offline mode, a mockable artifact directory, and dependency reporting for the model families a user actually invokes.
The package is being made safe to distribute. CRAN's policy on packages that reach the internet drove the first wave — graceful failure, tests that preflight their URLs and skip, examples seeded from a local mock model — and 1.7.0 turned the accumulated fixes into structure with named error classes for each failure mode. Only 1.7.2 adds anything a user would ask for: filename handling for Coh-Metrix and GAMET outputs that arrive as paths.
With the artifact registry hardened and documented, the pressure that produced nine releases in six months should ease, and attention can return to the models themselves — the vignette on scoring-model development added in 1.7.2 hints at that. Nothing here promises new models.
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ipeaplot or writeAlizer.
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
A market-microstructure toolkit that keeps adding estimators as the papers land.
A vowel-analysis package trimming dependencies after an email address got it archived.
The R half of the EMU speech database system, fixing what was quietly broken.
A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.
tidyplots keeps rebuilding its own foundations rather than layering around them.
See all ipeaplot alternatives → · See all writeAlizer alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ipeaplot and writeAlizer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ipeaplot and writeAlizer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
Top ipeaplot alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ipeaplot alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ipeaplot for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top writeAlizer alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "writeAlizer alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/writealizer for the full list with editorial commentary on each.