← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

legendry vs projoint

A side-by-side editorial comparison of legendry and projoint — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

legendry vs projoint: at a glance

Featurelegendryprojoint
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2, data-visualization, axes-and-legends, r-packageconjoint-analysis, survey-research, qualtrics, cran
Last editorial update2h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is legendry?

A ggplot2 extension quietly turning axes and legends into a place where other plots can live.

legendry extends ggplot2's guide system, letting axes and legends be composed from primitives and keys rather than accepted as given. The most recent release added guides for user-defined keys, upset matrices, arbitrary symbol placement, freeform annotations, and side-plots attached to an axis, plus a run-length-encoded range key and subtitles on custom axes. Between feature releases the package ships small patches, several of them tracking ggplot2's own changes.

Read the full legendry trajectory →

What is projoint?

projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.

projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.

Read the full projoint trajectory →

legendry vs projoint: editorial side-by-side

L
legendry
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A ggplot2 extension quietly turning axes and legends into a place where other plots can live.

◆ Current state

legendry extends ggplot2's guide system, letting axes and legends be composed from primitives and keys rather than accepted as given. The most recent release added guides for user-defined keys, upset matrices, arbitrary symbol placement, freeform annotations, and side-plots attached to an axis, plus a run-length-encoded range key and subtitles on custom axes. Between feature releases the package ships small patches, several of them tracking ggplot2's own changes.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is toward treating a guide as a rendering slot rather than a label strip. Dendrogram scales arrived in 0.2.0 with a matching axis guide; the newest release adds side-plots and upset symbol matrices to the same position. Each of these puts real graphical content where an axis used to be, and each one ships with a key function so the composition stays user-controllable. Note that this feed's order is unreliable: 0.2.1 was published eight months after 0.2.4 and minutes before 0.3.0, so neither version numbers nor timestamps indicate release order here.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of pairing each new guide with a matching key function is consistent enough that the next feature release will likely follow it again; the recurring forwards-compatibility patches also suggest another ggplot2-tracking release whenever upstream moves.

P
projoint
INFRA · APIS
2.5

projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.

◆ Current state

projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.

◆ Where it's heading

The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.

◆ Prediction

Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.

Alternatives to legendry and projoint

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either legendry or projoint.

See all legendry alternatives → · See all projoint alternatives →

Recent activity from legendry and projoint

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
  2. 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
  3. 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
  4. 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
  5. 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
  6. 3mo agolegendryFive new guides, including side-plots and upset matrices on axes
  7. 3mo agolegendryPatch release: guide placement, sizing and gizmo key fixes
  8. 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
  9. 11mo agolegendryCRAN fix for undeclared S7 imports
  10. 11mo agolegendryColourbar sizing fix; sandwich guides gain label suppression
  11. 1y agolegendryForwards-compatibility patch for an upcoming ggplot2 release
  12. 1y agolegendryDendrogram scales and axis guide, plus a circle size guide

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between legendry and projoint?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is legendry better than projoint?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to legendry?

Top legendry alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "legendry alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/legendry for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to projoint?

Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.