← Back to home
Comparison · Meetings

LiveKit vs SRS

A side-by-side editorial comparison of LiveKit and SRS — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:webrtc

LiveKit vs SRS: at a glance

FeatureLiveKitSRS
SectorMeetingsMeetings
Velocity score2.56.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesreal-time, infrastructure, authentication, webrtcstreaming-servers, webrtc, hevc, protocol-coverage
Last editorial update2mo ago6d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is LiveKit?

LiveKit keeps hardening its real-time core, this time tightening TURN auth.

LiveKit ships its real-time media server at a steady infra cadence, with v1.13.0 the latest tag. The visible work here is plumbing-level: authentication and connectivity rather than user-facing features.

Read the full LiveKit trajectory →

What is SRS?

SRS opens a 7.0 line built on a Go proxy tier, and drops features it no longer wants to carry.

SRS shipped the stable 6.0 line's first release on 12 August and, three hours later, the first development build of 7.0. The 6.0 line is now in pure maintenance — the r1 changelog is seven merges of DVR, WebRTC and edge fixes. Everything new is in 7.0-d0: RTSP playback, RTMPS, IPv6 across every protocol, HEVC in both directions between RTMP and WebRTC, and HLS fMP4 segments for HEVC and LL-HLS.

Read the full SRS trajectory →

LiveKit vs SRS: editorial side-by-side

L
LiveKit
MEETINGS
2.5

LiveKit keeps hardening its real-time core, this time tightening TURN auth.

◆ Current state

LiveKit ships its real-time media server at a steady infra cadence, with v1.13.0 the latest tag. The visible work here is plumbing-level: authentication and connectivity rather than user-facing features.

◆ Where it's heading

The single recent signal points at maintenance of the transport layer, removing legacy TURN auth behavior rather than adding surface. With only one entry in view, the broader arc is hard to read.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued point releases tightening connectivity and auth; the backwards-compatibility removal suggests a cleanup phase ahead of a larger version.

S
SRS
MEETINGS
6.3

SRS opens a 7.0 line built on a Go proxy tier, and drops features it no longer wants to carry.

◆ Current state

SRS shipped the stable 6.0 line's first release on 12 August and, three hours later, the first development build of 7.0. The 6.0 line is now in pure maintenance — the r1 changelog is seven merges of DVR, WebRTC and edge fixes. Everything new is in 7.0-d0: RTSP playback, RTMPS, IPv6 across every protocol, HEVC in both directions between RTMP and WebRTC, and HLS fMP4 segments for HEVC and LL-HLS.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is trading breadth of legacy surface for a narrower, better-covered core. 7.0-d0 removes the embedded GB28181 SIP server, multi-threading, Cygwin, and most configuration hot reload, while introducing a Go proxy server and origin-cluster architecture alongside the C++ media core. Protocol coverage keeps generalizing — each release makes a codec or an address family a property of the server rather than of one delivery path.

◆ Prediction

Expect the 7.0 line to run a long alpha and beta train the way 6.0 did, with the Go proxy and origin clustering carrying most of the remaining work and 6.0 continuing to receive backported fixes in parallel.

Alternatives to LiveKit and SRS

Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either LiveKit or SRS.

See all LiveKit alternatives → · See all SRS alternatives →

Recent activity from LiveKit and SRS

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6d agoSRSSRS 7.0-d0: Go proxy tier, RTSP playback, IPv6 across protocols
  2. 6d agoSRS6.0-r1: DVR, WebRTC and edge fixes on the stable line
  3. 2mo agoLiveKitv1.13.0 drops backwards compatibility for TURN auth without TTL
  4. 8mo agoSRSSRS 6.0 goes stable with H.265 across RTMP, HLS, TS and SRT
  5. 9mo agoSRS6.0-b3: use-after-free and HLS cleanup fixes
  6. 10mo agoSRS6.0-b2: configurable SRT stream IDs and a WHIP transcoding fix
  7. 11mo agoSRS6.0-b1: RTC crash fixes, Windows binary dropped

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between LiveKit and SRS?

Both compete on the same themes — webrtc — within Meetings. SRS is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is LiveKit better than SRS?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. SRS is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to LiveKit?

Top LiveKit alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "LiveKit alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/livekit for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to SRS?

Top SRS alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "SRS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/srs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.