Chanty
Chanty's feed is an HR statistics content mill, not a product changelog
A side-by-side editorial comparison of mailcow and Mailu — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
mailcow's release notes are almost entirely upstream security currency.
mailcow ships named seasonal releases with lettered revisions, and nearly every revision exists to pull in an upstream security fix - Redis, ClamAV, SOGo, Rspamd, nginx, unbound, Postfix. Revision B of the Mooly 2026 release updates Redis 7.4.10, ClamAV 1.4.6, and SOGo 5.12.10, adds minor web UI and nginx hardening, and removes a legacy DeltaChat sieve rule. The last release with genuinely new features was the March cut, which added forced 2FA, ACME DNS-01 challenges, and a passwordless autodiscover endpoint.
Mailu ships one pinned release per issue, and most of them are Roundcube's.
The 2024.06 branch releases on demand: an issue or PR comes in, a pinned version goes out, and the changelog is one or two lines. Four of the six most recent releases are webmail-driven — three Roundcube bumps in this window alone, the latest to 1.6.18 clearing a TLS-configuration warning, an earlier one to 1.6.17 closing two CVEs. The remainder are Mailu's own code: an X-Forwarded-By header fix tied to a published advisory, sieve field escaping that repaired autoreplies and closed an injection path, and two admin-UI form flow corrections.
mailcow ships named seasonal releases with lettered revisions, and nearly every revision exists to pull in an upstream security fix - Redis, ClamAV, SOGo, Rspamd, nginx, unbound, Postfix. Revision B of the Mooly 2026 release updates Redis 7.4.10, ClamAV 1.4.6, and SOGo 5.12.10, adds minor web UI and nginx hardening, and removes a legacy DeltaChat sieve rule. The last release with genuinely new features was the March cut, which added forced 2FA, ACME DNS-01 challenges, and a passwordless autodiscover endpoint.
For a self-hosted mail stack that bundles a dozen upstream components, keeping current with their CVEs is the product, and mailcow has organized its release cadence around exactly that. The pattern is consistent: a named release with some feature content every few months, then lettered revisions that are pure security currency plus small web UI escaping and validation fixes. The web interface is where mailcow's own code gets hardened - HTML escaping in quarantine views and sieve editors recurs across several revisions.
Expect the next entry to be another lettered revision carrying upstream updates, with the next named release likely bundling whatever feature work has accumulated since March.
The 2024.06 branch releases on demand: an issue or PR comes in, a pinned version goes out, and the changelog is one or two lines. Four of the six most recent releases are webmail-driven — three Roundcube bumps in this window alone, the latest to 1.6.18 clearing a TLS-configuration warning, an earlier one to 1.6.17 closing two CVEs. The remainder are Mailu's own code: an X-Forwarded-By header fix tied to a published advisory, sieve field escaping that repaired autoreplies and closed an injection path, and two admin-UI form flow corrections.
This is a maintenance branch behaving exactly as a maintenance branch should, and the pinned-version model is the product: operators get upstream security work packaged and tagged without tracking Roundcube themselves. The security items divide cleanly — most arrive from bundled components, a minority from Mailu's own code, and the project patches both on the same cadence. Nothing in this window suggests new capability is being developed on this branch.
Expect the next release to follow the same trigger: a Roundcube advisory or a client compatibility report producing a single-line changelog and a new pinned tag. Any feature work would be happening on the main version, which this feed does not cover.
Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mailcow or Mailu.
Chanty's feed is an HR statistics content mill, not a product changelog
Proton Bridge spends its first release in ten weeks on crashes, memory bounds and dead code
Stalwart is chasing mail RFCs and its own storage layer at the same time
Every manual control Mux ships now arrives with a Robots workflow that does it for you
Netcore's feed remains a demand-generation channel; ten entries, zero product releases.
Openfire keeps its XMPP server current without changing what it is.
See all mailcow alternatives → · See all Mailu alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. mailcow and Mailu are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mailcow and Mailu are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.
Top mailcow alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mailcow alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mailcow for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Mailu alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Mailu alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mailu for the full list with editorial commentary on each.