Chanty
Chanty's feed is an HR statistics content mill, not a product changelog
Comparison · Comms
mailcow vs VerneMQ
A side-by-side editorial comparison of mailcow and VerneMQ — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
mailcow vs VerneMQ: at a glance
What is mailcow?
mailcow's release notes are almost entirely upstream security currency.
mailcow ships named seasonal releases with lettered revisions, and nearly every revision exists to pull in an upstream security fix - Redis, ClamAV, SOGo, Rspamd, nginx, unbound, Postfix. Revision B of the Mooly 2026 release updates Redis 7.4.10, ClamAV 1.4.6, and SOGo 5.12.10, adds minor web UI and nginx hardening, and removes a legacy DeltaChat sieve rule. The last release with genuinely new features was the March cut, which added forced 2FA, ACME DNS-01 challenges, and a passwordless autodiscover endpoint.
What is VerneMQ?
VerneMQ's 2.2.0 collects a year of cluster and connection fixes into one release.
VerneMQ ships infrequently — the six most recent releases span February 2025 to August 2026 — and 2.2.0 on 9 August gathers roughly a year of accumulated work. Its contents are broker internals: a socket-accounting fix for rapid connect/disconnect churn, MQTT v5 property handling in the Lua auth cache, ETS-mirrored event subscriptions in the SWC metadata store, parallelised inter-node readiness checks, and anonymous-override extended to WebSocket listeners. The 2.1.3 release candidate from April was folded in and the version renumbered.
mailcow vs VerneMQ: editorial side-by-side
mailcow
5.0COMMS
mailcow's release notes are almost entirely upstream security currency.
◆ Current state
mailcow ships named seasonal releases with lettered revisions, and nearly every revision exists to pull in an upstream security fix - Redis, ClamAV, SOGo, Rspamd, nginx, unbound, Postfix. Revision B of the Mooly 2026 release updates Redis 7.4.10, ClamAV 1.4.6, and SOGo 5.12.10, adds minor web UI and nginx hardening, and removes a legacy DeltaChat sieve rule. The last release with genuinely new features was the March cut, which added forced 2FA, ACME DNS-01 challenges, and a passwordless autodiscover endpoint.
◆ Where it's heading
For a self-hosted mail stack that bundles a dozen upstream components, keeping current with their CVEs is the product, and mailcow has organized its release cadence around exactly that. The pattern is consistent: a named release with some feature content every few months, then lettered revisions that are pure security currency plus small web UI escaping and validation fixes. The web interface is where mailcow's own code gets hardened - HTML escaping in quarantine views and sieve editors recurs across several revisions.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next entry to be another lettered revision carrying upstream updates, with the next named release likely bundling whatever feature work has accumulated since March.
VerneMQ
2.5COMMS
VerneMQ's 2.2.0 collects a year of cluster and connection fixes into one release.
◆ Current state
VerneMQ ships infrequently — the six most recent releases span February 2025 to August 2026 — and 2.2.0 on 9 August gathers roughly a year of accumulated work. Its contents are broker internals: a socket-accounting fix for rapid connect/disconnect churn, MQTT v5 property handling in the Lua auth cache, ETS-mirrored event subscriptions in the SWC metadata store, parallelised inter-node readiness checks, and anonymous-override extended to WebSocket listeners. The 2.1.3 release candidate from April was folded in and the version renumbered.
◆ Where it's heading
Work concentrates on cluster behaviour and connection churn — the failure modes large MQTT fleets actually hit — rather than on protocol surface. Defaults are being revisited alongside the fixes: the retain-expiry check is now off by default and SWC initial sync is set to off, both choices that favour predictable behaviour on busy clusters over automatic housekeeping. Development stays maintainer-paced, with dependency bumps making up a visible share of each changelog, and the commercial EULA on binary packages continues to sit alongside the open source.
◆ Prediction
The next release is most likely another long-cycle collection of cluster and listener fixes rather than a feature line. Nothing in these entries points to a 3.0 direction.
Alternatives to mailcow and VerneMQ
Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mailcow or VerneMQ.
Proton Bridge
Proton Bridge spends its first release in ten weeks on crashes, memory bounds and dead code
Stalwart
Stalwart is chasing mail RFCs and its own storage layer at the same time
Mux
Every manual control Mux ships now arrives with a Robots workflow that does it for you
Netcore Cloud
Netcore's feed remains a demand-generation channel; ten entries, zero product releases.
Openfire
Openfire keeps its XMPP server current without changing what it is.
See all mailcow alternatives → · See all VerneMQ alternatives →
Recent activity from mailcow and VerneMQ
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agomailcow🏖️🐮 Mooly 2026 | Postfix 3.10.12, Rspamd 4.1.0 & Nginx 1.30.3 - Revision B
- 9d agoVerneMQSocket-count fix, WS(S) anonymous override, faster cluster readiness
- 20d agomailcow🏖️🐮 Mooly 2026 | Postfix 3.10.12, Rspamd 4.1.0 & Nginx 1.30.3 - Revision A
- 1mo agomailcow🏖️🐮 Mooly 2026 | Postfix 3.10.12, Rspamd 4.1.0 & Nginx 1.30.3
- 2mo agomailcowThird May revision: unbound CVE and nginx 1.30.2
- 3mo agomailcowSecond May revision: quarantine table HTML escaping
- 3mo agomailcowSOGo 5.12.8 covering four upstream security issues
- 3mo agoVerneMQTesting candidate later folded into 2.2.0
- 5mo agoVerneMQSUBACK error-path fix and routing-table memory reduction
- 10mo agoVerneMQSyslog boot fix and an HTTPS config regression from 2.1.0
- 1y agoVerneMQBreaking on-disk metadata format change
- 1y agoVerneMQRC3: bridge reconnect and inter-node connect options
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between mailcow and VerneMQ?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. mailcow is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is mailcow better than VerneMQ?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mailcow is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to mailcow?
Top mailcow alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mailcow alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mailcow for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to VerneMQ?
Top VerneMQ alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "VerneMQ alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/vernemq for the full list with editorial commentary on each.