ggprism
A Prism-styled ggplot2 theme in maintenance, now surviving ggplot2 4.0.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
mice vs qol
A side-by-side editorial comparison of mice and qol — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
mice vs qol: at a glance
What is mice?
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
mice is the reference implementation of multiple imputation by chained equations, and the default answer to missing data in R. The releases here follow a consistent shape: one or two substantive additions per version, most contributed by outside authors, plus fixes to methods that have been in the package for years. The current 3.19.0 adds predict_mi(), which pools predictions across imputations under Rubin's rules and can return prediction intervals.
What is qol?
A SAS-to-R comfort layer that has quietly grown into its own dialect.
qol is a one-maintainer R package aimed at analysts moving from SAS: SAS-shaped verbs (compute., if./else_if., retain_value, do_if blocks), format-driven tabulation through any_table()/summarise_plus(), and styled Excel output as the default destination. Releases land roughly monthly and each one is large. The recent line has shifted from adding verbs to letting conditions be written as parsed character strings, which is the closest the package gets to reproducing SAS syntax inside R.
mice vs qol: editorial side-by-side
mice
0.0INFRA · APIS
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
◆ Current state
mice is the reference implementation of multiple imputation by chained equations, and the default answer to missing data in R. The releases here follow a consistent shape: one or two substantive additions per version, most contributed by outside authors, plus fixes to methods that have been in the package for years. The current 3.19.0 adds predict_mi(), which pools predictions across imputations under Rubin's rules and can return prediction intervals.
◆ Where it's heading
Two things are happening. The imputation method catalogue keeps widening — lasso variants, multivariate PMM, categorical PMM via canonical correlation — while the pooling side is being extended past its original purpose, first to synthetic data, now to predictions on held-out sets. That second thread points at predictive modelling workflows rather than the inferential ones mice was built for. Meanwhile the maintainers keep finding consequential old bugs: the augment() ordered-factor defect in 3.18.0 had been silently degrading ordinal imputations for years.
◆ Prediction
predict_mi() is framed around evaluating predictive performance on test sets, and the ignore argument added in 3.12.0 already exists to hold out rows from the imputation model. Expect the next work to join those up into a fuller train/test story for imputed data, since the pieces are now in place but not yet connected.
qol
0.0INFRA · APIS
A SAS-to-R comfort layer that has quietly grown into its own dialect.
◆ Current state
qol is a one-maintainer R package aimed at analysts moving from SAS: SAS-shaped verbs (compute., if./else_if., retain_value, do_if blocks), format-driven tabulation through any_table()/summarise_plus(), and styled Excel output as the default destination. Releases land roughly monthly and each one is large. The recent line has shifted from adding verbs to letting conditions be written as parsed character strings, which is the closest the package gets to reproducing SAS syntax inside R.
◆ Where it's heading
Three threads are visible across these releases. Syntax fidelity is the newest: ifelse_multi() introduced character-string conditions with SAS-style writing, and if./else_if. immediately picked the style up. Tabulation flexibility is the constant — any_table() gains per-variable statistic selection, nested variable combinations in brackets, vector order_by, compute support. The third is ecosystem plumbing the maintainer builds when a gap appears: file I/O in 1.3.0, a console message system, global style options, macro variables, and in 1.3.2 a code_statistics() script scanner. Renames to dodge data.table and dplyr masking recur often enough to be a pattern.
◆ Prediction
The maintainer flagged the new percentile behaviour as a first iteration that only works with few grouping variables, so a performance pass on it is the clearest outstanding item. Beyond that the character-condition syntax has reached three functions in two releases and looks likely to spread to the remaining filter-bearing verbs.
Alternatives to mice and qol
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mice or qol.
TrendLSW
Wavelet trend estimation tightens the defaults it shipped with.
mmpca
Back from CRAN removal under a new maintainer, with the compiled layer rebuilt.
PINstimation
A market-microstructure toolkit that keeps adding estimators as the papers land.
nzilbb.vowels
A vowel-analysis package trimming dependencies after an email address got it archived.
emuR
The R half of the EMU speech database system, fixing what was quietly broken.
Recent activity from mice and qol
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoqolifelse_multi() brings SAS-style string conditions to R
- 2mo agoqolcode_statistics() scans script folders; retain_stat() generalizes
- 3mo agoqolcompute. and recode. renamed to dodge dplyr masking
- 4mo agoqolFile I/O, a console message system and do_if filter blocks
- 5mo agoqolRow and column percentage keywords; reworked dummy data
- 6mo agoqolMacro variables, multi-file import/export and text helpers
- 8mo agomicemice 3.19.0 ⚡
- 1y agomicemice 3.18.0
- 1y agomicemice 3.17.0
- 3y agomicemice 3.16.0
- 3y agomicemice 3.15.0
- 4y agomicemice 3.14.0
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between mice and qol?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. mice and qol are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is mice better than qol?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mice and qol are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to mice?
Top mice alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mice alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mice for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to qol?
Top qol alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qol alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qol for the full list with editorial commentary on each.