← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

MVMR vs silx

A side-by-side editorial comparison of MVMR and silx — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

MVMR vs silx: at a glance

FeatureMVMRsilx
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmendelian randomization, r, causal inference, geneticsscientific-computing, data-visualization, synchrotron, qt
Last editorial update3d ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is MVMR?

MVMR spent 2026 discovering its own estimators had been returning the wrong numbers

MVMR implements multivariable Mendelian randomization — conditional instrument strength, pleiotropy tests and heterogeneity-robust effect estimation from GWAS summary data. The package has been releasing steadily through 2026, and the substantive releases are all corrections rather than features. Two core routines were found to be computing the wrong quantity outright: qhet_mvmr() built weights from the minimised objective value instead of the minimiser, and strhet_mvmr() never minimised the Q-statistic at all.

Read the full MVMR trajectory →

What is silx?

silx settles into maintenance a release after its PySide6 migration

silx is in the quiet phase after a generational release. 3.1.1 is a single fix to FitWidget loading a fit function from file. The release before it, 3.1.0, was the first real feature work since the migration - asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, and dark-theme icons - and 3.0.1 was similarly small. The 3.0.0 cut that reset the Qt binding and Python floor still defines what the line is doing.

Read the full silx trajectory →

MVMR vs silx: editorial side-by-side

M
MVMR
ANALYTICS
0.0

MVMR spent 2026 discovering its own estimators had been returning the wrong numbers

◆ Current state

MVMR implements multivariable Mendelian randomization — conditional instrument strength, pleiotropy tests and heterogeneity-robust effect estimation from GWAS summary data. The package has been releasing steadily through 2026, and the substantive releases are all corrections rather than features. Two core routines were found to be computing the wrong quantity outright: qhet_mvmr() built weights from the minimised objective value instead of the minimiser, and strhet_mvmr() never minimised the Q-statistic at all.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a sustained audit, not a maintenance drift. Each release since February has fixed a specific analytical defect — omitted intercepts in the exposure-on-genotype regressions, a division by zero when a gencov list held exactly two variants, covariance matrices computed wrongly for matrix inputs, a spurious covariance warning — and several explicitly warn that reported values will differ from previous versions. The strhet_mvmr() rewrite to iteratively reweighted least squares also removes a combinatorial grid that could exhaust memory past three exposures, so the function is now usable as well as correct.

◆ Prediction

The corrections have been walking through the package function by function, and the ones with published fixes so far are the heterogeneity and covariance routines; the remaining untouched estimators are the natural next stop if the audit continues at this pace.

S
silx
ANALYTICS
5.0

silx settles into maintenance a release after its PySide6 migration

◆ Current state

silx is in the quiet phase after a generational release. 3.1.1 is a single fix to FitWidget loading a fit function from file. The release before it, 3.1.0, was the first real feature work since the migration - asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, and dark-theme icons - and 3.0.1 was similarly small. The 3.0.0 cut that reset the Qt binding and Python floor still defines what the line is doing.

◆ Where it's heading

The cadence has slowed markedly since April, and the content has shifted from structural change to plotting and colormap refinement. That is the expected shape after a binding migration: downstream beamline code needs a stable target, so the project trades feature velocity for a quiet surface. The gap between 3.0.1 in May and 3.1.0 in August is the clearest signal of the deliberate slowdown.

◆ Prediction

Expect further point releases servicing the plotting and fitting widgets rather than another structural change, with feature work continuing to arrive in the 3.1.x minors rather than patches.

Alternatives to MVMR and silx

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either MVMR or silx.

See all MVMR alternatives → · See all silx alternatives →

Recent activity from MVMR and silx

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4h agosilxFitWidget fix for loading a fit function from file
  2. 9d agosilx3.1.0: asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, dark-theme icons
  3. 1mo agoMVMRMVMR rewrites strhet_mvmr() after finding it never minimised Q
  4. 1mo agoMVMRMVMR corrects qhet_mvmr() weights and three covariance bugs
  5. 3mo agoMVMRNew vignette on estimating phenotypic correlations
  6. 3mo agosilx3.0.1: silx view fails to disable HDF5 file locking
  7. 3mo agoMVMRMVMR 0.4.5
  8. 3mo agosilx3.0.0: PySide6 becomes the default Qt binding, Python 3.10 required
  9. 3mo agosilx3.0.0rc1: release candidate for the PySide6 migration
  10. 4mo agoMVMRMVMR 0.4.4
  11. 5mo agoMVMRMVMR restores intercepts omitted from snpcov_mvmr() regressions
  12. 1y agosilx2.2.2: plot axes limits, OpenGL axes and libhdf5 1.14 fixes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between MVMR and silx?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. silx is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is MVMR better than silx?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. silx is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to MVMR?

Top MVMR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "MVMR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mvmr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to silx?

Top silx alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "silx alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/silx for the full list with editorial commentary on each.