← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

PEIMAN2 vs surveycore

A side-by-side editorial comparison of PEIMAN2 and surveycore — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packages

PEIMAN2 vs surveycore: at a glance

FeaturePEIMAN2surveycore
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesproteomics, post-translational-modification, enrichment-analysis, reproducibilitysurvey-statistics, variance-estimation, replicate-weights, api-stability
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is PEIMAN2?

PEIMAN2 cut its annotation database loose from its release cycle without breaking CRAN.

PEIMAN2 does enrichment analysis over post-translational modifications, testing whether a protein list is enriched for particular PTMs against UniProt-derived annotations, with translation functions bridging to mass spectrometry workflows. Its answers are only as current as its bundled database, and until June that database could only be refreshed by releasing a new package version. Version 1.1.0 changes that.

Read the full PEIMAN2 trajectory →

What is surveycore?

surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.

surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.

Read the full surveycore trajectory →

PEIMAN2 vs surveycore: editorial side-by-side

P
PEIMAN2
INFRA · APIS
0.0

PEIMAN2 cut its annotation database loose from its release cycle without breaking CRAN.

◆ Current state

PEIMAN2 does enrichment analysis over post-translational modifications, testing whether a protein list is enriched for particular PTMs against UniProt-derived annotations, with translation functions bridging to mass spectrometry workflows. Its answers are only as current as its bundled database, and until June that database could only be refreshed by releasing a new package version. Version 1.1.0 changes that.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has been moving from a fixed snapshot toward versioned, user-selectable data. Earlier releases updated the bundled database in place — 1.0.0 shipped the March 2025 version and said little else — which meant the annotation vintage was whatever the package version implied. Now update_peiman_database() downloads and caches external database files and UniProt PTM lists, enrichment workflows take a database_version argument, and the mass-spec translators take a ptmlist_version, so an analysis can pin a dated database rather than a package release. The CRAN-safe default is preserved deliberately: loading, examples and checks still use the bundled internal data and need no network.

◆ Prediction

Version pinning is now expressible but the release notes do not describe how a chosen version is recorded in output, so surfacing the active database version in results is the natural companion. The database and the UniProt PTM list are versioned separately, which leaves room for a combined manifest.

S
surveycore
INFRA · APIS
0.0

surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.

◆ Current state

surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.

◆ Where it's heading

The last months before 1.0.0 were spent making the awkward designs behave like the ordinary ones. Non-probability designs gained jackknife replicate schemes and got their bootstrap repweights routed through the replicate-weight variance estimator in survey_glm(), matching every other estimation function. The survey_collection abstraction — several surveys treated as one pseudo-data-frame — was tightened rather than extended: divergent grouping across members now errors instead of stitching a patchwork with bind_rows(), and the missing-variable argument was renamed and given a stored default on the collection itself. A documentation audit before 1.0.0 turned up six dispatch and print bugs and corrections across forty-plus files, which is the kind of thing that surfaces when an API is being frozen rather than extended.

◆ Prediction

A declared-stable API means the next releases should be additive or corrective rather than breaking, and the pre-1.0.0 pattern of breaking renames should stop. The tight version pinning between the two packages means surveytidy releases will keep following surveycore's.

Alternatives to PEIMAN2 and surveycore

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either PEIMAN2 or surveycore.

See all PEIMAN2 alternatives → · See all surveycore alternatives →

Recent activity from PEIMAN2 and surveycore

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agoPEIMAN2Database updates decouple from package releases
  2. 2mo agosurveycoreFirst stable release: all four survey design types complete
  3. 3mo agosurveycoreget_effective_n() computes effective sample size
  4. 3mo agosurveycoreCollections error on divergent grouping; .on_missing renamed
  5. 4mo agosurveycoreCRAN patch removing surveytidy from the vignette
  6. 1y agoPEIMAN2Bundled database refreshed to the March 2025 UniProt vintage
  7. 1y agoPEIMAN2Documentation fix for the second example dataset
  8. 2y agoPEIMAN2Background lists for SEA and PSEA; tidyverse dependency dropped

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between PEIMAN2 and surveycore?

Both compete on the same themes — r-packages — within Infra & APIs. PEIMAN2 and surveycore are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is PEIMAN2 better than surveycore?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. PEIMAN2 and surveycore are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to PEIMAN2?

Top PEIMAN2 alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PEIMAN2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/peiman2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to surveycore?

Top surveycore alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveycore alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveycore for the full list with editorial commentary on each.