openairmaps
The mapping half of the openair stack, currently dismantling its own static plotting in favour of the parent package.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
projoint vs Rhino
A side-by-side editorial comparison of projoint and Rhino — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
projoint vs Rhino: at a glance
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
What is Rhino?
Rhino's release line runs on release candidates, and 1.12 makes room for coding agents.
Rhino publishes only release candidates to this feed — every entry back to 1.9 is an -rc tag, with no final release ever appearing. The 1.12.0 candidate is the first in the window with user-visible substance: a `use` function that scaffolds an AGENTS.md file carrying Rhino-specific instructions, plus a `use` function for the CI template. The rest is maintenance: covr-based test coverage, e2e tests, Node dependency updates, and a maintainer handover.
projoint vs Rhino: editorial side-by-side
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
Rhino
0.0INFRA · APIS
Rhino's release line runs on release candidates, and 1.12 makes room for coding agents.
◆ Current state
Rhino publishes only release candidates to this feed — every entry back to 1.9 is an -rc tag, with no final release ever appearing. The 1.12.0 candidate is the first in the window with user-visible substance: a `use` function that scaffolds an AGENTS.md file carrying Rhino-specific instructions, plus a `use` function for the CI template. The rest is maintenance: covr-based test coverage, e2e tests, Node dependency updates, and a maintainer handover.
◆ Where it's heading
Rhino is converging on scaffolding as its main surface — the framework's value is increasingly in what it generates for you rather than what it does at runtime, and 1.12 extends that generation to instructions meant for AI coding agents rather than humans. The maintainer change and the CI/coverage work in the same release read as consolidation after a long gap: 1.11 shipped in April 2025, 1.12 not until June 2026.
◆ Prediction
More `use_*` scaffolding functions are the obvious next increment, since two arrived in a single release. Whether the AGENTS.md instructions grow into deeper agent tooling is not something these entries settle.
Alternatives to projoint and Rhino
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either projoint or Rhino.
openair
Air quality analysis rebuilt on ggplot2, twenty years of lattice plotting dropped in one release.
retroharmonize
Survey harmonization tooling that spent its last release earning its way back onto CRAN.
asar
A NOAA report-template generator being debugged by the workshops that teach it.
CBTF
A fuzzer for R packages that grew from one argument at a time to parallel runs across whole namespaces.
phyloatlas
An atlas of the tree of life that keeps publishing what it got wrong, and stopped shipping the trees it does not own.
See all projoint alternatives → · See all Rhino alternatives →
Recent activity from projoint and Rhino
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 2mo agoRhinoRhino 1.12 adds AGENTS.md and CI-template scaffolding
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
- 1y agoRhinoRhino 1.11.0 release candidate
- 1y agoRhinoRhino 1.10.0 release candidate
- 2y agoRhinoRhino 1.9 adds bslib support and prettier formatting
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between projoint and Rhino?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is projoint better than Rhino?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Rhino?
Top Rhino alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rhino alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rhino-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.