vcfR
A genomics workhorse whose visible release feed stops dead in mid-2020.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
qol vs trackeR
A side-by-side editorial comparison of qol and trackeR — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
qol vs trackeR: at a glance
What is qol?
A SAS-to-R comfort layer that has quietly grown into its own dialect.
qol is a one-maintainer R package aimed at analysts moving from SAS: SAS-shaped verbs (compute., if./else_if., retain_value, do_if blocks), format-driven tabulation through any_table()/summarise_plus(), and styled Excel output as the default destination. Releases land roughly monthly and each one is large. The recent line has shifted from adding verbs to letting conditions be written as parsed character strings, which is the closest the package gets to reproducing SAS syntax inside R.
What is trackeR?
Fitness-tracking analysis in slow maintenance, still absorbing upstream breakage.
trackeR reads GPS and fitness-tracker files in TCX, GPX and JSON form and turns them into session data, distribution and concentration profiles, and route plots. Feature work concentrated in the 1.5 series in 2019; the two releases since are corrective. The latest swaps the plot layout dependencies for patchwork and fixes plot_route() returning nothing.
qol vs trackeR: editorial side-by-side
qol
0.0INFRA · APIS
A SAS-to-R comfort layer that has quietly grown into its own dialect.
◆ Current state
qol is a one-maintainer R package aimed at analysts moving from SAS: SAS-shaped verbs (compute., if./else_if., retain_value, do_if blocks), format-driven tabulation through any_table()/summarise_plus(), and styled Excel output as the default destination. Releases land roughly monthly and each one is large. The recent line has shifted from adding verbs to letting conditions be written as parsed character strings, which is the closest the package gets to reproducing SAS syntax inside R.
◆ Where it's heading
Three threads are visible across these releases. Syntax fidelity is the newest: ifelse_multi() introduced character-string conditions with SAS-style writing, and if./else_if. immediately picked the style up. Tabulation flexibility is the constant — any_table() gains per-variable statistic selection, nested variable combinations in brackets, vector order_by, compute support. The third is ecosystem plumbing the maintainer builds when a gap appears: file I/O in 1.3.0, a console message system, global style options, macro variables, and in 1.3.2 a code_statistics() script scanner. Renames to dodge data.table and dplyr masking recur often enough to be a pattern.
◆ Prediction
The maintainer flagged the new percentile behaviour as a first iteration that only works with few grouping variables, so a performance pass on it is the clearest outstanding item. Beyond that the character-condition syntax has reached three functions in two releases and looks likely to spread to the remaining filter-bearing verbs.
trackeR
0.0INFRA · APIS
Fitness-tracking analysis in slow maintenance, still absorbing upstream breakage.
◆ Current state
trackeR reads GPS and fitness-tracker files in TCX, GPX and JSON form and turns them into session data, distribution and concentration profiles, and route plots. Feature work concentrated in the 1.5 series in 2019; the two releases since are corrective. The latest swaps the plot layout dependencies for patchwork and fixes plot_route() returning nothing.
◆ Where it's heading
Recent releases track other people's changes: ggmap moving to Stadia maps, gridExtra giving way to patchwork, a cadence field being read into the wrong column. The 2019 entries are where the analysis surface was built out, with cumulative elevation gain, compressed file reading and elevation-noise thresholds, and it has not moved much since.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to be another compatibility or parsing fix rather than a new metric.
Alternatives to qol and trackeR
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either qol or trackeR.
dialr
The R phone-number package stopped only parsing numbers and started asking them where they are.
ggVennDiagram
A Venn diagram package whose public release notes say almost nothing — including about its copyright cleanup.
ordinalsimr
A Shiny app for choosing the right ordinal test reached CRAN in a single 90-minute burst of tags.
transltr
A new R localization package that reached CRAN and immediately downgraded itself to experimental.
hereR
An R client for HERE's location APIs, shaped almost entirely by what the vendor exposes next.
Recent activity from qol and trackeR
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoqolifelse_multi() brings SAS-style string conditions to R
- 2mo agoqolcode_statistics() scans script folders; retain_stat() generalizes
- 3mo agoqolcompute. and recode. renamed to dodge dplyr masking
- 4mo agoqolFile I/O, a console message system and do_if filter blocks
- 5mo agoqolRow and column percentage keywords; reworked dummy data
- 6mo agoqolMacro variables, multi-file import/export and text helpers
- 11mo agotrackeRplot_route() fixed; plot layout moved to patchwork
- 2y agotrackeRTCX cadence bug fixed; m_per_min units and Stadia maps
- 7y agotrackeRCompressed file reading and correct GPX power extraction
- 7y agotrackeRvertical_noise threshold for elevation gain
- 7y agotrackeRCumulative elevation gain added as a derived metric
- 7y agotrackeRFortify and print bugs fixed in summary objects
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between qol and trackeR?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. qol and trackeR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is qol better than trackeR?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. qol and trackeR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to qol?
Top qol alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qol alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qol for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to trackeR?
Top trackeR alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "trackeR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tracker for the full list with editorial commentary on each.