← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

selection.index vs valr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of selection.index and valr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

selection.index vs valr: at a glance

Featureselection.indexvalr
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesplant-breeding, selection-index, genomic-selection, rcppgenomics, interval-arithmetic, bioinformatics, bigwig
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is selection.index?

A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite

selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.

Read the full selection.index trajectory →

What is valr?

valr's interval verbs now read genomic files in place instead of demanding a loaded tibble.

valr reimplements bedtools-style genome interval arithmetic as tidyverse verbs backed by C++. Its long project has been closing the behavioural gap with bedtools — the book-ended interval semantics finally match in 0.10.0, three releases after the deprecation began. The July release also ends the assumption that intervals must be in memory: bed_map(), bed_intersect(), bed_subtract(), bed_coverage() and bed_window() accept a bigWig or bigBed path or URL where an interval table used to go.

Read the full valr trajectory →

selection.index vs valr: editorial side-by-side

S
selection.index
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite

◆ Current state

selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.

◆ Where it's heading

The first version series added one function at a time — combinatorial indices, then genetic advance, then mean performance under randomised block designs — against a fixed phenotypic framing. Version 2.0.0 abandons that framing rather than extending it. Genomic and marker information become inputs the package understands, multi-cycle simulation becomes a built-in toolset, and the old combinatorial entry points are replaced by a named lpsi(). The 2.0.1 follow-up is entirely CI and numerical-stability work, which reads like a maintainer bracing a much larger surface.

◆ Prediction

A seventeen-runner CI matrix mirroring every CRAN check flavour, added days after 2.0.0, says the immediate concern is keeping a compiled multi-family package green rather than adding to it. Expect stabilisation releases before anything new.

V
valr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

valr's interval verbs now read genomic files in place instead of demanding a loaded tibble.

◆ Current state

valr reimplements bedtools-style genome interval arithmetic as tidyverse verbs backed by C++. Its long project has been closing the behavioural gap with bedtools — the book-ended interval semantics finally match in 0.10.0, three releases after the deprecation began. The July release also ends the assumption that intervals must be in memory: bed_map(), bed_intersect(), bed_subtract(), bed_coverage() and bed_window() accept a bigWig or bigBed path or URL where an interval table used to go.

◆ Where it's heading

Two arcs converge here. One is compatibility: min_overlap arrived with a deprecation warning in 0.9.0 and its default flipped from 0 to 1 in 0.10.0, so book-ended intervals are excluded by default as bedtools does, with the internal calculations in bed_closest() and friends deliberately left counting them. The other is the file-backed path, which grew out of the cpp11bigwig dependency adopted in 0.8.3 for read_bigwig() and re-exported in 0.9.0 — reading a file became querying one. Underneath, the C++ base keeps getting lighter: Rcpp swapped for cpp11, rlang cut to a single function, per-group memory copies removed from three verbs.

◆ Prediction

Only five verbs take a file argument today and bed_closest(), bed_glyph() and the statistical verbs do not, so extending the file-backed path across the rest of the API is the obvious follow-up. The deprecated tibble re-exports and the now-defunct n_fields argument suggest continued removal of the compatibility layer in the next minor release.

Alternatives to selection.index and valr

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either selection.index or valr.

See all selection.index alternatives → · See all valr alternatives →

Recent activity from selection.index and valr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agovalrInterval verbs read bigWig and bigBed files directly
  2. 5mo agoselection.indexCI expanded to 17 runners after the 2.0.0 rewrite
  3. 5mo agoselection.indexGenomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core
  4. 6mo agoselection.indexUnspecified general performance improvements
  5. 7mo agovalrbed_slop() and bed_flank() preserve input row order
  6. 8mo agovalrmin_overlap introduced; C++ backend moves from Rcpp to cpp11
  7. 1y agovalrTest updated for ggplot2 3.6.0
  8. 1y agovalrread_bigwig() switches to cpp11bigwig; read_gtf() deprecated
  9. 1y agovalrCRAN Rd link NOTE and maintainer email change
  10. 2y agoselection.indexMean performance for randomised block designs
  11. 3y agoselection.indexsel.index() and sel.score.rank() removed for comb.indices()
  12. 4y agoselection.indexGenetic advance calculation added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between selection.index and valr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. selection.index and valr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is selection.index better than valr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. selection.index and valr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to selection.index?

Top selection.index alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "selection.index alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/selection-index for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to valr?

Top valr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "valr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/valr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.