mice
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
selection.index vs writeAlizer
A side-by-side editorial comparison of selection.index and writeAlizer — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
selection.index vs writeAlizer: at a glance
What is selection.index?
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.
What is writeAlizer?
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
writeAlizer generates predicted writing-quality scores from features produced by Coh-Metrix, ReaderBench and GAMET, downloading its trained scoring models on demand. Every release in this window — nine of them between September 2025 and February 2026 — is about that download path rather than the scoring: classed error conditions, checksum verification, an offline mode, a mockable artifact directory, and dependency reporting for the model families a user actually invokes.
selection.index vs writeAlizer: editorial side-by-side
selection.index
0.0INFRA · APIS
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
◆ Current state
selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.
◆ Where it's heading
The first version series added one function at a time — combinatorial indices, then genetic advance, then mean performance under randomised block designs — against a fixed phenotypic framing. Version 2.0.0 abandons that framing rather than extending it. Genomic and marker information become inputs the package understands, multi-cycle simulation becomes a built-in toolset, and the old combinatorial entry points are replaced by a named lpsi(). The 2.0.1 follow-up is entirely CI and numerical-stability work, which reads like a maintainer bracing a much larger surface.
◆ Prediction
A seventeen-runner CI matrix mirroring every CRAN check flavour, added days after 2.0.0, says the immediate concern is keeping a compiled multi-family package green rather than adding to it. Expect stabilisation releases before anything new.
writeAlizer
0.0INFRA · APIS
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
◆ Current state
writeAlizer generates predicted writing-quality scores from features produced by Coh-Metrix, ReaderBench and GAMET, downloading its trained scoring models on demand. Every release in this window — nine of them between September 2025 and February 2026 — is about that download path rather than the scoring: classed error conditions, checksum verification, an offline mode, a mockable artifact directory, and dependency reporting for the model families a user actually invokes.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is being made safe to distribute. CRAN's policy on packages that reach the internet drove the first wave — graceful failure, tests that preflight their URLs and skip, examples seeded from a local mock model — and 1.7.0 turned the accumulated fixes into structure with named error classes for each failure mode. Only 1.7.2 adds anything a user would ask for: filename handling for Coh-Metrix and GAMET outputs that arrive as paths.
◆ Prediction
With the artifact registry hardened and documented, the pressure that produced nine releases in six months should ease, and attention can return to the models themselves — the vignette on scoring-model development added in 1.7.2 hints at that. Nothing here promises new models.
Alternatives to selection.index and writeAlizer
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either selection.index or writeAlizer.
PINstimation
A market-microstructure toolkit that keeps adding estimators as the papers land.
nzilbb.vowels
A vowel-analysis package trimming dependencies after an email address got it archived.
emuR
The R half of the EMU speech database system, fixing what was quietly broken.
BAS
A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.
tidyplots
tidyplots keeps rebuilding its own foundations rather than layering around them.
See all selection.index alternatives → · See all writeAlizer alternatives →
Recent activity from selection.index and writeAlizer
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5mo agoselection.indexCI expanded to 17 runners after the 2.0.0 rewrite
- 5mo agoselection.indexGenomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core ⚡
- 6mo agowriteAlizerOne example rewrapped to silence a CRAN check note
- 6mo agoselection.indexUnspecified general performance improvements
- 8mo agowriteAlizerFilename stems recovered from Coh-Metrix and GAMET paths
- 10mo agowriteAlizerOffline example guard, declared as no API change
- 10mo agowriteAlizerNamed error classes for every model-download failure mode
- 10mo agowriteAlizerNetwork failures degrade gracefully under CRAN policy
- 11mo agowriteAlizerwa_seed_example_models() exported and documented
- 2y agoselection.indexMean performance for randomised block designs
- 3y agoselection.indexsel.index() and sel.score.rank() removed for comb.indices()
- 4y agoselection.indexGenetic advance calculation added
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between selection.index and writeAlizer?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. selection.index and writeAlizer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is selection.index better than writeAlizer?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. selection.index and writeAlizer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to selection.index?
Top selection.index alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "selection.index alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/selection-index for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to writeAlizer?
Top writeAlizer alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "writeAlizer alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/writealizer for the full list with editorial commentary on each.