silx
silx settles into maintenance a release after its PySide6 migration
Comparison · Analytics
spatsoc vs TimescaleDB
A side-by-side editorial comparison of spatsoc and TimescaleDB — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
spatsoc vs TimescaleDB: at a glance
What is spatsoc?
One maintainer, one or two new collective-motion metrics per release, for two years straight
spatsoc turns animal relocation data into spatial and social groupings — dyads, fission-fusion events, group centroids — and the recent history is a metronomic accretion of collective-motion measures on top of that base. Since late 2024 nearly every release has added one or two: polarization, direction to leader, position along the group axis, directional correlation delay, edge alignment, edge zones. Development is essentially single-handed; almost every merged PR in this window carries the same author.
What is TimescaleDB?
TimescaleDB is paying down correctness debt in its columnstore query paths.
The 2.29 line is in patch mode after 2.29.0 landed chunk exclusion for DML in late July. 2.29.1 carried three security advisories alongside compression fixes, and 2.29.2 is bug fixes only - most of them wrong-results bugs in the columnar execution paths rather than crashes. Every release note in this window recommends upgrading at the next opportunity.
spatsoc vs TimescaleDB: editorial side-by-side
spatsoc
0.0ANALYTICS
One maintainer, one or two new collective-motion metrics per release, for two years straight
◆ Current state
spatsoc turns animal relocation data into spatial and social groupings — dyads, fission-fusion events, group centroids — and the recent history is a metronomic accretion of collective-motion measures on top of that base. Since late 2024 nearly every release has added one or two: polarization, direction to leader, position along the group axis, directional correlation delay, edge alignment, edge zones. Development is essentially single-handed; almost every merged PR in this window carries the same author.
◆ Where it's heading
The December 2025 release changes register. Alongside three new calc_distance / calc_direction / calc_centroid functions and an internal assertion family, it deprecates the `projection` argument in favour of `crs` and lands a round of checks and tests explicitly staged ahead of a new spatial interface. Read together, that is a package finishing its metric catalogue and starting to rework the coordinate-handling layer underneath it to match modern R-spatial conventions — the same evolution that made it drop its startup warning back in 0.2.7.
◆ Prediction
The next release is likely the spatial-interface rework the 0.2.12 test and assertion work was staged for, with `projection` moving from deprecated to removed. Feature additions should slow while that lands.
TimescaleDB
5.0ANALYTICS
TimescaleDB is paying down correctness debt in its columnstore query paths.
◆ Current state
The 2.29 line is in patch mode after 2.29.0 landed chunk exclusion for DML in late July. 2.29.1 carried three security advisories alongside compression fixes, and 2.29.2 is bug fixes only - most of them wrong-results bugs in the columnar execution paths rather than crashes. Every release note in this window recommends upgrading at the next opportunity.
◆ Where it's heading
The feature work of 2.27 and 2.28 - vectorized filter evaluation, first/last derived straight from columnstore batch metadata, sparse indexes, SkipScan on compressed data - has been followed by a steady stream of fixes to those same code paths. 2.29.2 alone repairs SkipScan dropping uncompressed rows, sparse-index pushdown returning wrong results for IS NULL, and gapfill over window aggregates. That is the normal cost of pushing query optimizations into a compressed columnar store, and the project is working through it release by release rather than pausing.
◆ Prediction
With three consecutive patch releases on the 2.29 line and no new highlighted features since 2.29.0, the next minor is likely to resume the columnstore performance work - though the density of wrong-results fixes suggests more patches first.
Alternatives to spatsoc and TimescaleDB
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either spatsoc or TimescaleDB.
Plotly
Plotly is turning its cloud into a metered compute platform with an enterprise on-ramp.
aniread
aniread stops asking you to know which tracker wrote the file
Rho
Rho's release machinery finally produced a stable build — and it shipped no new product.
Usermaven
Usermaven closed the loop: data comes in from anywhere, and now it goes back out.
OpenCTI
OpenCTI spends a release unblocking queues and hardening upserts
See all spatsoc alternatives → · See all TimescaleDB alternatives →
Recent activity from spatsoc and TimescaleDB
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoTimescaleDB2.29.2: SkipScan and sparse-index correctness fixes
- 15d agoTimescaleDB2.29.1: security fixes plus compression bugfixes
- 19d agoTimescaleDB2.29.0: chunk exclusion speeds up UPDATE and DELETE
- 1mo agoTimescaleDB2.28.3: columnar pipeline correctness fixes
- 1mo agoTimescaleDB2.28.2: upgrade-path fixes for 2.28.1
- 1mo agoTimescaleDB2.28.1: compressed-table crash and constraint fixes
- 8mo agospatsoccalc_* functions added; projection deprecated ahead of a spatial rework
- 10mo agospatsocEdge zones and edge direction added; centroid NA handling fixed
- 11mo agospatsocEdge alignment metric added
- 1y agospatsocLeader edge delay added; units dependency moves to a CRAN release
- 1y agospatsocDirectional correlation delay added; longlat direction bug fixed
- 1y agospatsocLeadership and group-axis position measures added
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between spatsoc and TimescaleDB?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. TimescaleDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is spatsoc better than TimescaleDB?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. TimescaleDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to spatsoc?
Top spatsoc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatsoc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatsoc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to TimescaleDB?
Top TimescaleDB alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "TimescaleDB alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/timescaledb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.