← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

stochvol vs TrendLSW

A side-by-side editorial comparison of stochvol and TrendLSW — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

stochvol vs TrendLSW: at a glance

FeaturestochvolTrendLSW
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian-inference, stochastic-volatility, mcmc, rcpptime-series, wavelets, defaults, plotting
Last editorial update2h ago45m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is stochvol?

A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed

stochvol runs MCMC for stochastic volatility models, with a C++ sampler underneath an R interface. Five years of releases in this window contain no new models: the work is compiler and dependency compatibility, CRAN check notes, and a steady trickle of corrections to the sampler itself. Its methodological milestone, the Journal of Statistical Software paper, is recorded in a 2021 tag.

Read the full stochvol trajectory →

What is TrendLSW?

Wavelet trend estimation tightens the defaults it shipped with.

TrendLSW estimates trend and evolutionary wavelet spectrum for locally stationary time series through a single TLSW() entry point. Its history since the first CRAN appearance is short and centres on defaults and plotting around that function, plus one dataset addition. The latest entry carries both the 1.0.4 and 1.0.3 notes in one body.

Read the full TrendLSW trajectory →

stochvol vs TrendLSW: editorial side-by-side

S
stochvol
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed

◆ Current state

stochvol runs MCMC for stochastic volatility models, with a C++ sampler underneath an R interface. Five years of releases in this window contain no new models: the work is compiler and dependency compatibility, CRAN check notes, and a steady trickle of corrections to the sampler itself. Its methodological milestone, the Journal of Statistical Software paper, is recorded in a 2021 tag.

◆ Where it's heading

This is what a finished computational package looks like. The formula interface arrived at 3.1.0 and nothing has been added since; what changes is the ground underneath — RcppArmadillo major versions, UBSan checks, error-handling conventions moving from Rf_error to Rcpp::stop for correct memory management. The recurring pattern worth watching is that several releases fix real errors in the sampler's proposal distributions, found by users and by CRAN's own instrumented checks rather than by the maintainer.

◆ Prediction

Nothing in these notes suggests new methodology. Expect the next release when RcppArmadillo or a CRAN check flavour forces one, and treat any bug report against the samplers as the more consequential event.

T
TrendLSW
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Wavelet trend estimation tightens the defaults it shipped with.

◆ Current state

TrendLSW estimates trend and evolutionary wavelet spectrum for locally stationary time series through a single TLSW() entry point. Its history since the first CRAN appearance is short and centres on defaults and plotting around that function, plus one dataset addition. The latest entry carries both the 1.0.4 and 1.0.3 notes in one body.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has moved from getting onto CRAN to correcting the choices it launched with: the spectrum filter defaults were swapped to their trend counterparts, the plot.CI switch was removed in favour of inferring it from what was actually computed, and an example was shrunk to fit check timings. This is consolidation around a stable API rather than expansion.

◆ Prediction

Further releases most likely continue tuning TLSW() defaults and plot behaviour; the entries show no work toward new estimators.

Alternatives to stochvol and TrendLSW

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either stochvol or TrendLSW.

See all stochvol alternatives → · See all TrendLSW alternatives →

Recent activity from stochvol and TrendLSW

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5mo agostochvolSampler crash with constant parameters fixed, plus RcppArmadillo 15
  2. 8mo agoTrendLSWTrend filter defaults replace spectrum defaults; plot.CI dropped
  3. 1y agostochvolTwo CRAN check notes cleared
  4. 1y agostochvolProposal variance corrected in the centered parameterisation
  5. 2y agoTrendLSWNew z.acc and z.labels datasets shipped with the package
  6. 2y agoTrendLSWDescription field and plot.TLSW documentation fixes
  7. 2y agostochvolCRAN stochvol 3.2.4
  8. 2y agostochvolRolling-window indexing and inverse gamma prior validation fixed
  9. 3y agostochvolCore C++ sampler routines exported for reuse

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between stochvol and TrendLSW?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. stochvol and TrendLSW are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is stochvol better than TrendLSW?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. stochvol and TrendLSW are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to stochvol?

Top stochvol alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "stochvol alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/stochvol for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to TrendLSW?

Top TrendLSW alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "TrendLSW alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/trendlsw for the full list with editorial commentary on each.