vcfR
A genomics workhorse whose visible release feed stops dead in mid-2020.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
trackeR vs valr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of trackeR and valr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
trackeR vs valr: at a glance
What is trackeR?
Fitness-tracking analysis in slow maintenance, still absorbing upstream breakage.
trackeR reads GPS and fitness-tracker files in TCX, GPX and JSON form and turns them into session data, distribution and concentration profiles, and route plots. Feature work concentrated in the 1.5 series in 2019; the two releases since are corrective. The latest swaps the plot layout dependencies for patchwork and fixes plot_route() returning nothing.
What is valr?
valr's interval verbs now read genomic files in place instead of demanding a loaded tibble.
valr reimplements bedtools-style genome interval arithmetic as tidyverse verbs backed by C++. Its long project has been closing the behavioural gap with bedtools — the book-ended interval semantics finally match in 0.10.0, three releases after the deprecation began. The July release also ends the assumption that intervals must be in memory: bed_map(), bed_intersect(), bed_subtract(), bed_coverage() and bed_window() accept a bigWig or bigBed path or URL where an interval table used to go.
trackeR vs valr: editorial side-by-side
trackeR
0.0INFRA · APIS
Fitness-tracking analysis in slow maintenance, still absorbing upstream breakage.
◆ Current state
trackeR reads GPS and fitness-tracker files in TCX, GPX and JSON form and turns them into session data, distribution and concentration profiles, and route plots. Feature work concentrated in the 1.5 series in 2019; the two releases since are corrective. The latest swaps the plot layout dependencies for patchwork and fixes plot_route() returning nothing.
◆ Where it's heading
Recent releases track other people's changes: ggmap moving to Stadia maps, gridExtra giving way to patchwork, a cadence field being read into the wrong column. The 2019 entries are where the analysis surface was built out, with cumulative elevation gain, compressed file reading and elevation-noise thresholds, and it has not moved much since.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to be another compatibility or parsing fix rather than a new metric.
valr
0.0INFRA · APIS
valr's interval verbs now read genomic files in place instead of demanding a loaded tibble.
◆ Current state
valr reimplements bedtools-style genome interval arithmetic as tidyverse verbs backed by C++. Its long project has been closing the behavioural gap with bedtools — the book-ended interval semantics finally match in 0.10.0, three releases after the deprecation began. The July release also ends the assumption that intervals must be in memory: bed_map(), bed_intersect(), bed_subtract(), bed_coverage() and bed_window() accept a bigWig or bigBed path or URL where an interval table used to go.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs converge here. One is compatibility: min_overlap arrived with a deprecation warning in 0.9.0 and its default flipped from 0 to 1 in 0.10.0, so book-ended intervals are excluded by default as bedtools does, with the internal calculations in bed_closest() and friends deliberately left counting them. The other is the file-backed path, which grew out of the cpp11bigwig dependency adopted in 0.8.3 for read_bigwig() and re-exported in 0.9.0 — reading a file became querying one. Underneath, the C++ base keeps getting lighter: Rcpp swapped for cpp11, rlang cut to a single function, per-group memory copies removed from three verbs.
◆ Prediction
Only five verbs take a file argument today and bed_closest(), bed_glyph() and the statistical verbs do not, so extending the file-backed path across the rest of the API is the obvious follow-up. The deprecated tibble re-exports and the now-defunct n_fields argument suggest continued removal of the compatibility layer in the next minor release.
Alternatives to trackeR and valr
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either trackeR or valr.
dialr
The R phone-number package stopped only parsing numbers and started asking them where they are.
ggVennDiagram
A Venn diagram package whose public release notes say almost nothing — including about its copyright cleanup.
ordinalsimr
A Shiny app for choosing the right ordinal test reached CRAN in a single 90-minute burst of tags.
transltr
A new R localization package that reached CRAN and immediately downgraded itself to experimental.
hereR
An R client for HERE's location APIs, shaped almost entirely by what the vendor exposes next.
See all trackeR alternatives → · See all valr alternatives →
Recent activity from trackeR and valr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agovalrInterval verbs read bigWig and bigBed files directly ⚡
- 7mo agovalrbed_slop() and bed_flank() preserve input row order
- 8mo agovalrmin_overlap introduced; C++ backend moves from Rcpp to cpp11
- 11mo agotrackeRplot_route() fixed; plot layout moved to patchwork
- 1y agovalrTest updated for ggplot2 3.6.0
- 1y agovalrread_bigwig() switches to cpp11bigwig; read_gtf() deprecated
- 1y agovalrCRAN Rd link NOTE and maintainer email change
- 2y agotrackeRTCX cadence bug fixed; m_per_min units and Stadia maps
- 7y agotrackeRCompressed file reading and correct GPX power extraction
- 7y agotrackeRvertical_noise threshold for elevation gain
- 7y agotrackeRCumulative elevation gain added as a derived metric
- 7y agotrackeRFortify and print bugs fixed in summary objects
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between trackeR and valr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. trackeR and valr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is trackeR better than valr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. trackeR and valr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to trackeR?
Top trackeR alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "trackeR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tracker for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to valr?
Top valr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "valr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/valr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.