Licensing settled, ApexCharts is back to changing what a chart can take as input.
EvoPhylo alternatives
The best EvoPhylo alternatives in analytics tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.
Updated Aug 19, 2026
Looking for the best alternatives to EvoPhylo? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in analytics tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, EvoPhylo shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 0.0 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.
About EvoPhylo
EvoPhylo added BEAST2 alongside MrBayes, then went quiet for two years.
EvoPhylo handles post-processing for Bayesian evolutionary rate and fossilized birth-death analyses, originally against MrBayes output. The 0.3.2 release added BEAST2 support for both FBD functions and rates analysis, making it usable by labs on either platform. Since then there has been one clock-partition fix and, in August 2025, a release whose notes say only that there are updated functions and bug fixes.
Velocity 0.0 · Last update 4d ago
Top 12 alternatives to EvoPhylo
Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.
Usermaven closed the loop: data comes in from anywhere, and now it goes back out.
The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.
dbt Fusion's second beta is adapter work: ClickHouse gets materializations, indexes, and catalogs
Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.
AgencyAI got skills three weeks ago; everything since has been making them routine.
Interfaces gets the permissions layer it needed, one release after launching.
Omni ships weekly, and almost every week the headline item is an AI feature.
Plotly is turning its cloud into a metered compute platform with an enterprise on-ramp.
Rho's release machinery finally produced a stable build — and it shipped no new product.
OpenCTI spends a release unblocking queues and hardening upserts
After its largest release, OpenObserve is patching the seams.
EvoPhylo vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance
Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.
| Product | Velocity | Sparks · 30d | Focus areas | Latest release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EvoPhylo (baseline) | 0.0 | 0 | phylogeneticsbayesian-inferencebeast2 | — |
| ApexCharts | 10.0 | 3 | chartingraw-data-inputchart-morphing | Histogram bins raw samples; charts morph between types |
| Usermaven | 8.8 | 3 | product-analyticsreverse-etlmcp | 🔌 Salesforce, Reverse ETL, and connectors: your stack, connected |
| tulpa | 7.5 | 2 | bayesian-inferencecran-releaser-packages | First CRAN release: engine surface unchanged from 0.0.198 |
| dbt Core | 6.3 | 0 | analytics-engineeringdbt-fusionadapters | — |
| Fulcrum | 6.3 | 0 | gisesri-migrationoffline-maps | — |
| AgencyAnalytics | 6.3 | 1 | agency-reportingai-assistantskills | Skills in AgencyAI |
| NocoDB | 6.3 | 1 | no-code-databaseinterfacespermissions | 2026.08.0 : Introducing Interfaces |
| Omni | 6.3 | 1 | business-intelligencesemantic-modelai-routines | AI semantic model generation goes generally available in Omni |
| Plotly | 6.3 | 1 | ai-app-buildingplotly-cloudmetered-billing | Custom Domains in Plotly Cloud |
| Rho | 6.3 | 1 | r-ideai-agentsmodel-routing | Agent conversations and provider-routed models land in Rho |
| OpenCTI | 6.3 | 0 | threat-intelligencestixdata-model | — |
| OpenObserve | 6.3 | 1 | observabilitysynthetic-monitoringmcp | v0.92.0 adds synthetic monitoring, workflows, and AI observability |
The 12 best EvoPhylo alternatives, in depth
1. ApexCharts · velocity 10.0
Licensing settled, ApexCharts is back to changing what a chart can take as input.
Over the last 30 days ApexCharts shipped 3 meaningful updates vs EvoPhylo's 0, most recently “Histogram bins raw samples; charts morph between types”. Its velocity score of 10.0/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, ApexCharts focuses on charting, raw data input and chart morphing.
Over the last 30 days ApexCharts has been shipping faster than EvoPhylo — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full ApexCharts trajectory → · Compare EvoPhylo vs ApexCharts →
2. Usermaven · velocity 8.8
Usermaven closed the loop: data comes in from anywhere, and now it goes back out.
Over the last 30 days Usermaven shipped 3 meaningful updates vs EvoPhylo's 0, most recently “🔌 Salesforce, Reverse ETL, and connectors: your stack, connected”. Its velocity score of 8.8/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, Usermaven focuses on product analytics, reverse etl and mcp.
Over the last 30 days Usermaven has been shipping faster than EvoPhylo — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full Usermaven trajectory → · Compare EvoPhylo vs Usermaven →
3. tulpa · velocity 7.5
The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.
Over the last 30 days tulpa shipped 2 meaningful updates vs EvoPhylo's 0, most recently “First CRAN release: engine surface unchanged from 0.0.198”. Its velocity score of 7.5/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, tulpa focuses on bayesian inference, cran release and r packages.
Over the last 30 days tulpa has been shipping faster than EvoPhylo — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
4. dbt Core · velocity 6.3
Dbt Fusion's second beta is adapter work: ClickHouse gets materializations, indexes, and catalogs.
Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, dbt Core focuses on analytics engineering, dbt fusion and adapters.
dbt Core and EvoPhylo have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
5. Fulcrum · velocity 6.3
Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.
Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, Fulcrum focuses on gis, esri migration and offline maps.
Fulcrum and EvoPhylo have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
6. AgencyAnalytics · velocity 6.3
AgencyAI got skills three weeks ago; everything since has been making them routine.
Over the last 30 days AgencyAnalytics shipped 1 meaningful update vs EvoPhylo's 0, most recently “Skills in AgencyAI”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, AgencyAnalytics focuses on agency reporting, ai assistant and skills.
Over the last 30 days AgencyAnalytics has been shipping faster than EvoPhylo — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full AgencyAnalytics trajectory → · Compare EvoPhylo vs AgencyAnalytics →
7. NocoDB · velocity 6.3
Interfaces gets the permissions layer it needed, one release after launching.
Over the last 30 days NocoDB shipped 1 meaningful update vs EvoPhylo's 0, most recently “2026.08.0 : Introducing Interfaces”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, NocoDB focuses on no code database, interfaces and permissions.
Over the last 30 days NocoDB has been shipping faster than EvoPhylo — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
8. Omni · velocity 6.3
Omni ships weekly, and almost every week the headline item is an AI feature.
Over the last 30 days Omni shipped 1 meaningful update vs EvoPhylo's 0, most recently “AI semantic model generation goes generally available in Omni”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, Omni focuses on business intelligence, semantic model and ai routines.
Over the last 30 days Omni has been shipping faster than EvoPhylo — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
9. Plotly · velocity 6.3
Plotly is turning its cloud into a metered compute platform with an enterprise on-ramp.
Over the last 30 days Plotly shipped 1 meaningful update vs EvoPhylo's 0, most recently “Custom Domains in Plotly Cloud”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, Plotly focuses on ai app building, plotly cloud and metered billing.
Over the last 30 days Plotly has been shipping faster than EvoPhylo — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
10. Rho · velocity 6.3
Rho's release machinery finally produced a stable build — and it shipped no new product.
Over the last 30 days Rho shipped 1 meaningful update vs EvoPhylo's 0, most recently “Agent conversations and provider-routed models land in Rho”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, Rho focuses on r ide, ai agents and model routing.
Over the last 30 days Rho has been shipping faster than EvoPhylo — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
11. OpenCTI · velocity 6.3
OpenCTI spends a release unblocking queues and hardening upserts.
Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, OpenCTI focuses on threat intelligence, stix and data model.
OpenCTI and EvoPhylo have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
12. OpenObserve · velocity 6.3
After its largest release, OpenObserve is patching the seams.
Over the last 30 days OpenObserve shipped 1 meaningful update vs EvoPhylo's 0, most recently “v0.92.0 adds synthetic monitoring, workflows, and AI observability”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where EvoPhylo leans on phylogenetics, bayesian inference and beast2, OpenObserve focuses on observability, synthetic monitoring and mcp.
Over the last 30 days OpenObserve has been shipping faster than EvoPhylo — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full OpenObserve trajectory → · Compare EvoPhylo vs OpenObserve →
Frequently asked questions
What are the best alternatives to EvoPhylo?
The top EvoPhylo alternatives we currently track in analytics tools are ApexCharts, Usermaven, tulpa, dbt Core, Fulcrum, ranked by recent ship velocity.
How is this list of EvoPhylo alternatives ranked?
Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.
Can I compare EvoPhylo directly with one of these alternatives?
Yes — every card has a "Compare with EvoPhylo" link to a side-by-side /compare page.