Fourwaves
Fourwaves is closing the gaps around its payments layer and its form editor at the same time.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of 3CX and Asterisk — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
3CX is rebuilding around an AI Server, and it just handed the channel the AI edition to sell.
Recent releases split between the AI Server — sizing guidance, deployment updates, MCP and admin control in the V20 Update 10 alpha — and steady client work, most recently the V5.8 softphone beta with one-click SSO and outbound number choice. Packaging moved too: partner and distributor NFR subscriptions were replaced with the AI Edition.
Four parallel branches, one fix set — Asterisk's changelog is a backport ledger, not a feature list.
Asterisk maintains mainline 20, 22 and 23 branches alongside a certified track, and lands each fix set across all of them at once. The June 25 batch was a coordinated security release resolving roughly 20 advisories on every branch simultaneously. The August 7 batch opens the next cycle with release candidates carrying identical commit, author and issue counts across 23.5.0, 22.11.0 and 20.21.0.
Recent releases split between the AI Server — sizing guidance, deployment updates, MCP and admin control in the V20 Update 10 alpha — and steady client work, most recently the V5.8 softphone beta with one-click SSO and outbound number choice. Packaging moved too: partner and distributor NFR subscriptions were replaced with the AI Edition.
The AI Server is being treated as infrastructure customers deploy themselves rather than a hosted add-on, with hardware guidance, dedicated deployment tooling and an MCP endpoint for connecting assistants. Putting the AI Edition into partner hands and easing self-managed subscription changes both point at pushing that stack out through the channel rather than upselling it centrally.
Expect V20 Update 10 to move from alpha toward release with the AI Server management changes already previewed, and the V5.8 softphone beta to reach general availability.
Asterisk maintains mainline 20, 22 and 23 branches alongside a certified track, and lands each fix set across all of them at once. The June 25 batch was a coordinated security release resolving roughly 20 advisories on every branch simultaneously. The August 7 batch opens the next cycle with release candidates carrying identical commit, author and issue counts across 23.5.0, 22.11.0 and 20.21.0.
The visible output is backport discipline rather than feature development. Release notes carry counts, tags and advisory IDs but no feature text, so the changelog reads as a stability and security ledger for a mature telephony core. The certified track deliberately lags mainline and picks up a smaller subset of each cycle.
The three release candidates should promote to final within the project's usual short RC window, with the certified branch taking the same fixes a cycle later. Nothing in these entries points to feature work in flight.
Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either 3CX or Asterisk.
Fourwaves is closing the gaps around its payments layer and its form editor at the same time.
Homer's storage churn pauses long enough to ship a catalog backup CLI.
mediasoup has moved off data-channel plumbing and into the media path — timing first, now layer selection.
Wowza keeps arguing its case for detection inside the streaming pipeline
Vimeo ships another batched product post: six changes to embeds and the player
Switcher Studio's feed is a livestreaming how-to blog, not a changelog
See all 3CX alternatives → · See all Asterisk alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. 3CX is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. 3CX is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.
Top 3CX alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "3CX alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/3cx for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Asterisk alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Asterisk alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/asterisk for the full list with editorial commentary on each.