← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Apache Baremaps vs OpenReplay

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Apache Baremaps and OpenReplay — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Apache Baremaps vs OpenReplay: at a glance

FeatureApache BaremapsOpenReplay
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgeospatial, vector-tiles, openstreetmap, apache-incubatorsession replay, self-hosted, go, dependency upgrades
Last editorial update2mo ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Apache Baremaps?

Baremaps got geoparquet and hillshading, then went quiet for eighteen months in incubation

Apache Baremaps is a pipeline for building vector map tiles from OpenStreetMap and raster sources, still carrying the incubating designation across every release in this window. The work splits between format support and the tile-serving path: geoparquet reading arrived in 0.8.1 along with vector contours and hillshades generated from raster tiles, while 0.8.2 fixed a Postgres tile store performance issue and added a materialized-views refresher. Release notes open with the same appeal for new contributors every time, which is itself a signal about the size of the community.

Read the full Apache Baremaps trajectory →

What is OpenReplay?

OpenReplay moves its Go backend to pgx v5 and patches vulnerable deps across 1.25–1.27.

On Oct 28 OpenReplay pushed backup tags on the 1.25, 1.26 and 1.27 lines that migrate the Go backend to pgx v5, bump vulnerable Go dependencies such as golang.org/x/net, and then fix a replay query that broke under the migration by casting issue_types to text. The previous days moved the assist and sourcemap-reader services to Node 26 LTS on the same lines and on 1.22.

Read the full OpenReplay trajectory →

Apache Baremaps vs OpenReplay: editorial side-by-side

A0.0

Baremaps got geoparquet and hillshading, then went quiet for eighteen months in incubation

◆ Current state

Apache Baremaps is a pipeline for building vector map tiles from OpenStreetMap and raster sources, still carrying the incubating designation across every release in this window. The work splits between format support and the tile-serving path: geoparquet reading arrived in 0.8.1 along with vector contours and hillshades generated from raster tiles, while 0.8.2 fixed a Postgres tile store performance issue and added a materialized-views refresher. Release notes open with the same appeal for new contributors every time, which is itself a signal about the size of the community.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads are visible. One is broadening what Baremaps can read and produce — geoparquet in, terrain-derived vector layers out — which pushes it past OSM-to-tiles toward a general geospatial pipeline. The other is making the Postgres-backed tile store hold up under load, with version-dependent query generation and materialized view refreshing suggesting real deployments hit its limits. Cadence has been slowing throughout: roughly nine months between 0.7.1 and 0.7.2, eleven to 0.8.1, then two months to 0.8.2, and nothing published since February 2025.

◆ Prediction

The entries offer no roadmap statement, and eighteen months without a release makes the incubation status the open question rather than the feature set; nothing here indicates whether graduation or dormancy is the more likely next step.

O
OpenReplay
ANALYTICS
5.0

OpenReplay moves its Go backend to pgx v5 and patches vulnerable deps across 1.25–1.27.

◆ Current state

On Oct 28 OpenReplay pushed backup tags on the 1.25, 1.26 and 1.27 lines that migrate the Go backend to pgx v5, bump vulnerable Go dependencies such as golang.org/x/net, and then fix a replay query that broke under the migration by casting issue_types to text. The previous days moved the assist and sourcemap-reader services to Node 26 LTS on the same lines and on 1.22.

◆ Where it's heading

The release feed is all maintenance: dependency and runtime upgrades backported to several self-hosted lines at once, published as timestamped backup tags without feature notes. The quick follow-up fix shows the pgx migration is touching real query paths.

◆ Prediction

Expect more backup tags as the pgx v5 change reaches 1.22 and any further query fixes land; nothing in the entries points to a feature release.

Alternatives to Apache Baremaps and OpenReplay

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Apache Baremaps or OpenReplay.

See all Apache Baremaps alternatives → · See all OpenReplay alternatives →

Recent activity from Apache Baremaps and OpenReplay

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoOpenReplay1.25: replay query fix after pgx v5 migration
  2. 1d agoOpenReplay1.26: replay query fix after pgx v5 migration
  3. 1d agoOpenReplay1.27: replay query fix after pgx v5 migration
  4. 1d agoOpenReplay1.25: pgx v5 migration and Go dependency patches (re-cut)
  5. 1d agoOpenReplay1.25: pgx v5 migration and Go dependency patches
  6. 1d agoOpenReplay1.26: pgx v5 migration and Go dependency patches
  7. 1y agoApache BaremapsBaremaps 0.8.2 fixes Postgres tile store performance
  8. 1y agoApache BaremapsBaremaps 0.8.1 adds geoparquet, contours and hillshades
  9. 2y agoApache BaremapsBaremaps 0.7.2 is release packaging and dependency upkeep
  10. 3y agoApache BaremapsBaremaps ships its first release under the Apache Foundation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Apache Baremaps and OpenReplay?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. OpenReplay is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Apache Baremaps better than OpenReplay?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenReplay is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Apache Baremaps?

Top Apache Baremaps alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Apache Baremaps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/baremaps for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to OpenReplay?

Top OpenReplay alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenReplay alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openreplay for the full list with editorial commentary on each.