← Back to home
Comparison · Marketing

Bludit vs Open Web Analytics

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Bludit and Open Web Analytics — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Bludit vs Open Web Analytics: at a glance

FeatureBluditOpen Web Analytics
SectorMarketingMarketing
Velocity score0.07.5
Sparks · 30d02
Top themesflat-file-cms, mcp, security-fixes, apiweb-analytics, self-hosted, table-partitioning, job-scheduler
Last editorial update9d ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Bludit?

A flat-file CMS with a long CVE history just wired its API up for MCP.

Bludit ships every few weeks, and almost every release carries a security fix: an authentication bypass and arbitrary file upload in 3.18.4, an authenticated RCE via file upload plus .htaccess bypass in 3.20.0, a path traversal in the API files endpoint in 3.21.0, and session invalidation for disabled users in 3.22.0. Around that, the work is editor and dashboard maintenance, theme additions and a plugin hook for injecting editor toolbar buttons.

Read the full Bludit trajectory →

What is Open Web Analytics?

After a fortnight of repairs, OWA finally ships features again: partitioning and a scheduler.

OWA published more releases in the last month than in the previous two years, and 1.11.0 is the first of them that adds rather than repairs. It brings two new subsystems that depend on each other: date partitioning for the fact tables, and a job scheduler driven by a single cron entry. Behind it sits the repair sequence — security hardening in 1.8.2 and 1.8.3, a PHP 8.2 floor and rebuilt JavaScript toolchain in 1.9.0, an emergency 403 fix in 1.9.1, the PSR-4 migration and a repaired updater in 1.10.0, and tightened REST responses in 1.10.1.

Read the full Open Web Analytics trajectory →

Bludit vs Open Web Analytics: editorial side-by-side

B
Bludit
MARKETING
0.0

A flat-file CMS with a long CVE history just wired its API up for MCP.

◆ Current state

Bludit ships every few weeks, and almost every release carries a security fix: an authentication bypass and arbitrary file upload in 3.18.4, an authenticated RCE via file upload plus .htaccess bypass in 3.20.0, a path traversal in the API files endpoint in 3.21.0, and session invalidation for disabled users in 3.22.0. Around that, the work is editor and dashboard maintenance, theme additions and a plugin hook for injecting editor toolbar buttons.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel. One is a sustained security cleanup, largely driven by external reports and handled release by release. The other is a quiet repositioning of the API: 3.22.0 improved it specifically to support MCP, which points a file-based CMS at agent-driven authoring. The plugin hook work in 3.20.0 fits the same pattern of opening the editor to programmatic control.

◆ Prediction

Expect the MCP-facing API work to continue — the initial support arrived as API improvements rather than a documented server, which is the piece still missing.

O7.5

After a fortnight of repairs, OWA finally ships features again: partitioning and a scheduler.

◆ Current state

OWA published more releases in the last month than in the previous two years, and 1.11.0 is the first of them that adds rather than repairs. It brings two new subsystems that depend on each other: date partitioning for the fact tables, and a job scheduler driven by a single cron entry. Behind it sits the repair sequence — security hardening in 1.8.2 and 1.8.3, a PHP 8.2 floor and rebuilt JavaScript toolchain in 1.9.0, an emergency 403 fix in 1.9.1, the PSR-4 migration and a repaired updater in 1.10.0, and tightened REST responses in 1.10.1.

◆ Where it's heading

The project has moved from making itself installable to making itself operable at volume. The upgrade design says the maintainers know who they are dealing with: the schema update is mandatory and the scheduler refuses every job until it runs, but partitioning an existing install is deliberately left as a manual, dry-runnable step with a published cost of roughly five seconds per million rows per table, because it rewrites each fact table twice under a write lock. The new cron requirement is the first time OWA has asked operators to run something periodic, and the admin nag until it exists suggests they expect people to miss it.

◆ Prediction

With partitioning in place but opt-in, expect the follow-up work to be retention and pruning on top of the partitions — the reason to partition fact tables is to drop old ones cheaply, and the scheduler is the piece that would do it. The 2.0 deprecation list flagged in 1.10.0 remains the other open thread.

Alternatives to Bludit and Open Web Analytics

Other Marketing products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Bludit or Open Web Analytics.

See all Bludit alternatives → · See all Open Web Analytics alternatives →

Recent activity from Bludit and Open Web Analytics

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 14h agoOpen Web AnalyticsDate partitioning and a job scheduler land in OWA 1.11.0
  2. 14d agoOpen Web AnalyticsREST responses narrowed to documented properties
  3. 17d agoOpen Web AnalyticsPSR-4 migration completed and the updater repaired
  4. 20d agoOpen Web AnalyticsEmergency fix for the 403 blocking every fresh install
  5. 22d agoOpen Web AnalyticsPHP 8.2 floor, rebuilt JS toolchain, and a test suite
  6. 26d agoOpen Web AnalyticsREST authentication fixed on the siteusers endpoint
  7. 3mo agoBluditAPI reworked to support MCP; disabled-user sessions invalidated
  8. 3mo agoBluditPatch: preview token type guard
  9. 3mo agoBluditPath traversal fixed in the API files endpoint
  10. 4mo agoBluditAuthenticated RCE via file upload fixed; editor toolbar hook added
  11. 4mo agoBluditFlavor Tailwind theme added; randomness and header fixes
  12. 5mo agoBluditAuthentication bypass and arbitrary file upload fixed

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Bludit and Open Web Analytics?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Open Web Analytics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Bludit better than Open Web Analytics?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Open Web Analytics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Marketing products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Bludit?

Top Bludit alternatives in Marketing are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Bludit alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bludit for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Open Web Analytics?

Top Open Web Analytics alternatives in Marketing are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Open Web Analytics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/open-web-analytics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.