DNSControl
DNSControl v5 is feature-frozen with a ship date, and rc9 is pure provider cleanup
Comparison · Infra & APIs
ClamAV vs Knock
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ClamAV and Knock — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
ClamAV vs Knock: at a glance
| Feature | ClamAV | Knock |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Infra & APIs | Infra & APIs |
| Velocity score | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 1 |
| Top themes | antivirus, cve patches, file parsers, dual branch | notifications, developer-infrastructure, rbac, workflow-automation |
| Last editorial update | 11d ago | 12h ago |
| Website | Visit → | — |
What is ClamAV?
Eight CVEs in one August batch — ClamAV's parser surface is the whole story.
ClamAV runs two supported lines, 1.5.x and 1.4.x, and publishes near-identical patch releases seconds apart whenever vulnerabilities land. The August pair is the largest yet in this window: eight CVEs in 1.5.4, six of them backported to 1.4.6, spanning the ZIP catalogue, GPT partition, PESpin, PDF, Mach-O and XAR parsers. Several reach back a decade or more — the PESpin overflow affects builds from 0.90 onward.
What is Knock?
Knock is hardening for enterprise buyers while its agent takes over the analysis work.
Knock ships weekly, in small, legible increments across three lanes: account governance (custom roles, passkeys), workflow primitives (wait-for-event, branch rebasing), and data ingress (Amplitude, Clay). The newest entry adds granular custom roles, which closes the last obvious gap in account-level access control. Alongside that, the in-product agent gained analytics, letting teams interrogate delivery performance without building reports.
ClamAV vs Knock: editorial side-by-side
ClamAV
5.0INFRA · APIS
Eight CVEs in one August batch — ClamAV's parser surface is the whole story.
◆ Current state
ClamAV runs two supported lines, 1.5.x and 1.4.x, and publishes near-identical patch releases seconds apart whenever vulnerabilities land. The August pair is the largest yet in this window: eight CVEs in 1.5.4, six of them backported to 1.4.6, spanning the ZIP catalogue, GPT partition, PESpin, PDF, Mach-O and XAR parsers. Several reach back a decade or more — the PESpin overflow affects builds from 0.90 onward.
◆ Where it's heading
Feature work has been paused since 1.5.0 last October; everything since is patch traffic against the file format parsers, and the batches are growing rather than shrinking. The August release widens the surface beyond parsing for the first time here, with a clamd STATS thread-safety bug that could disclose process memory or crash the daemon. Reporter credits increasingly come from automated discovery — Atuin, GitHub Security Lab, Trail of Bits — which suggests the find rate tracks the tooling pointed at this codebase, not new code being written.
◆ Prediction
Expect the dual-branch pattern to continue and per-batch CVE counts to stay high while automated fuzzing keeps sweeping the parser surface. These entries give no indication of a 1.6 line opening — there has been no development release since the 1.5.0 cycle.
Knock
6.3INFRA · APIS
Knock is hardening for enterprise buyers while its agent takes over the analysis work.
◆ Current state
Knock ships weekly, in small, legible increments across three lanes: account governance (custom roles, passkeys), workflow primitives (wait-for-event, branch rebasing), and data ingress (Amplitude, Clay). The newest entry adds granular custom roles, which closes the last obvious gap in account-level access control. Alongside that, the in-product agent gained analytics, letting teams interrogate delivery performance without building reports.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in parallel. The infrastructure lane is buying enterprise credibility — roles, passkeys, audit-grade permissions — the checklist items that decide procurement rather than daily use. The data lane keeps widening what can trigger a workflow: product analytics from Amplitude, enriched rows from Clay, internal Slack channels as a destination. Together they push Knock from a notification API toward the messaging control plane, with the agent as the layer that explains what the plane did.
◆ Prediction
Expect the roles work to continue into audit logs or scoped API keys, since granular permissions without an activity trail is an incomplete enterprise story. More data sources are likely on the same cadence, with the CRM and warehouse categories the obvious remaining gaps.
Alternatives to ClamAV and Knock
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ClamAV or Knock.
Casdoor
Casdoor is spending its release cadence moving auth checks from the client to the server
ESPHome
ESPHome ships on a calendar, and the August beta train is now five builds deep
Strimzi
Strimzi's 1.2.0 candidate closes with a logging fix and nothing else
Prowler
Prowler's assistant decides what to do with findings; the patches keep the scanner honest
NetBox
NetBox adds a cooling data model — the first new infrastructure domain since power
See all ClamAV alternatives → · See all Knock alternatives →
Recent activity from ClamAV and Knock
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoKnockCustom roles and permissions
- 6d agoKnockPower internal Slack alerts
- 7d agoKnockCategory + tag management
- 11d agoClamAVEight parser CVEs and a clamd STATS disclosure fix
- 11d agoClamAV1.4 branch takes six of the eight parser CVEs
- 13d agoKnockAmplitude data source
- 20d agoKnockAnalytics in the Knock agent ⚡
- 21d agoKnockWait for event function
- 1mo agoClamAVPESpin use-after-free and PE overflow patched
- 1mo agoClamAVSame PE fixes backported to the 1.4 line
- 5mo agoClamAVHTML parser crash fixed; Rust floor raised again
- 5mo agoClamAV1.4 branch takes the HTML and TIFF parser fixes
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between ClamAV and Knock?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Knock is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is ClamAV better than Knock?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Knock is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to ClamAV?
Top ClamAV alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ClamAV alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/clamav for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Knock?
Top Knock alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Knock alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/knock for the full list with editorial commentary on each.