Lightdash
Lightdash keeps handing authoring to outside agents and keeping the governed layer for itself.
Comparison · Analytics
constants vs Whatagraph
A side-by-side editorial comparison of constants and Whatagraph — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
constants vs Whatagraph: at a glance
| Feature | constants | Whatagraph |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Analytics | Analytics |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 5.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | physical-constants, codata, units, uncertainty-propagation | reporting, agencies, integrations, reliability |
| Last editorial update | 4d ago | 5h ago |
| Website | Visit → | — |
What is constants?
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.
What is Whatagraph?
Whatagraph keeps fixing what breaks when one account runs a thousand sources.
Whatagraph is working on the parts of agency reporting that break under volume rather than on new analysis capability. Stored data removed live API calls from render time in the Basis rebuild, connection failover keeps widgets alive when one teammate's token expires, and report shortcuts let a heavy report be split into a hub with supporting detail. Presentation control arrives steadily alongside — automatic conditional formatting, per-metric decimal places, chosen comparison colors. The newest change moves unified-field mapping into the Source Group builder, so a cross-channel group can be fixed in place instead of rebuilt.
constants vs Whatagraph: editorial side-by-side
constants
0.0ANALYTICS
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
◆ Current state
constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction set at 1.0.0 was to stop being a curated convenience wrapper and become a mechanical mirror of NIST. Hand-crafted symbol names were replaced with NIST's own ASCII symbols, categories adopted NIST's, and uncertainty switched from relative to absolute — all framed by the maintainer as necessary to make future CODATA updates routine. On top of that the package gained a correlation matrix and optional integration with the quantities package, moving it from a lookup table toward something that can propagate uncertainty.
◆ Prediction
Having rebuilt the symbol table specifically so CODATA revisions become mechanical, the next substantive release most likely tracks a new CODATA dataset rather than adding API. The experimental correlated-value support, disabled by default at 1.0.0, is the one part these entries flag as unfinished.
Whatagraph
5.0ANALYTICS
Whatagraph keeps fixing what breaks when one account runs a thousand sources.
◆ Current state
Whatagraph is working on the parts of agency reporting that break under volume rather than on new analysis capability. Stored data removed live API calls from render time in the Basis rebuild, connection failover keeps widgets alive when one teammate's token expires, and report shortcuts let a heavy report be split into a hub with supporting detail. Presentation control arrives steadily alongside — automatic conditional formatting, per-metric decimal places, chosen comparison colors. The newest change moves unified-field mapping into the Source Group builder, so a cross-channel group can be fixed in place instead of rebuilt.
◆ Where it's heading
The through-line is reliability and workflow cost at agency scale, where one account runs hundreds or thousands of sources across several people. Each release picks a specific moment where that scale used to force a detour — a dead token, a forty-widget report, a half-built source group — and removes the detour rather than adding a capability. Integration work stays additive and named: Ahrefs Rank Tracker, WhatConverts, Snowflake, bol., each filling a stated reporting gap rather than broadening a connector catalog.
◆ Prediction
Expect the same volume-driven treatment applied to the remaining multi-step setup flows, and further integrations chosen to close named gaps rather than to grow the connector count.
Alternatives to constants and Whatagraph
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either constants or Whatagraph.
Delta Lake
A 4.4.0 tag appears, but the feed carries only its release plumbing
distributions3
distributions3 0.3.0 adds sample-based distributions and likelihood derivatives
Basedash
Basedash keeps pushing its data out of the workspace — now to people without accounts
RStudio
RStudio ships through release branches, and the notes are commit messages
dbt Core
dbt Fusion's second beta is adapter work: ClickHouse gets materializations, indexes, and catalogs
See all constants alternatives → · See all Whatagraph alternatives →
Recent activity from constants and Whatagraph
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoWhatagraphUnify metrics and dimensions while creating a Source Group
- 7d agoWhatagraphTurn your report into client portal with Report shortcuts
- 21d agoWhatagraphOne broken connection won't break your reports
- 22d agoWhatagraphClearer charts and tables, and a faster way to find the right template
- 27d agoWhatagraphTrack your keywords against competitors with Ahrefs Rank Tracker
- 1mo agoWhatagraphBasis rebuilt: faster data, cleaner numbers, per-client sources
- 5y agoconstantsCompatibility fix for units 0.7-0
- 5y agoconstantsconstants 1.0.0 ⚡
- 8y agoconstantsUnit handling fixes ahead of the 1.0.0 rebuild
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between constants and Whatagraph?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Whatagraph is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is constants better than Whatagraph?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Whatagraph is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to constants?
Top constants alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "constants alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/constants-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Whatagraph?
Top Whatagraph alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Whatagraph alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/whatagraph for the full list with editorial commentary on each.