Whatagraph
Whatagraph keeps fixing what breaks when one account runs a thousand sources.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of contentanalysis and distributions3 — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
| Feature | contentanalysis | distributions3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Analytics | Analytics |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 6.3 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 1 |
| Top themes | text-analysis, bibliometrics, scientific-writing, r-package | r-package, probability-distributions, empirical-distributions, likelihood-inference |
| Last editorial update | 3d ago | 9h ago |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
A scientific-text analysis package moved from counting citations to classifying argument structure.
contentanalysis parses scientific papers from PDF and analyses their content — citation clustering, reference extraction and matching, word distribution, TF-IDF summaries by section. The most recent release adds a different kind of analysis: sentence-level classification of rhetorical moves, built on Swales' CARS model and extended to literature review and discussion sections, using rules by default with an optional Google Gemini path. PDF handling has been reworked in parallel for multi-column layouts and running header removal.
distributions3 0.3.0 adds sample-based distributions and likelihood derivatives
An R package giving probability distributions a consistent object interface - d/p/q/r functions, moments, and prodist() methods that pull a fitted distribution out of a regression object. Version 0.3.0 is the first substantive release under Achim Zeileis's maintenance, and it widens what a distribution is allowed to be: Empirical() represents a distribution by a random sample rather than by parameters, and numerical fallbacks now fill in cdf(), pdf(), quantile(), random() and the moments for any object that implements only some of them. New score() and hessian() generics compute first and second derivatives of the log-likelihood with respect to the parameters, analytically for a few distributions and numerically for the rest.
contentanalysis parses scientific papers from PDF and analyses their content — citation clustering, reference extraction and matching, word distribution, TF-IDF summaries by section. The most recent release adds a different kind of analysis: sentence-level classification of rhetorical moves, built on Swales' CARS model and extended to literature review and discussion sections, using rules by default with an optional Google Gemini path. PDF handling has been reworked in parallel for multi-column layouts and running header removal.
The arc runs from surface features toward discourse structure. Early releases were about getting references matched correctly and plots readable; the current one asks what function each sentence performs in the argument, which is a categorically harder question and one the package answers with rules first and a language model second. The optional-LLM design is worth noting for what it avoids — the analysis still runs without an API key, and the package has already had to prune retired Gemini model versions once, which is the maintenance cost of depending on a hosted model. Reference parsing is being made format-aware rather than pattern-guessing, with CrossRef enrichment filling in what the PDF omits.
Expect the rhetorical move classification to widen to more section types and the rule-based path to keep being the default, given the package has already been forced to track model deprecations on the optional one.
An R package giving probability distributions a consistent object interface - d/p/q/r functions, moments, and prodist() methods that pull a fitted distribution out of a regression object. Version 0.3.0 is the first substantive release under Achim Zeileis's maintenance, and it widens what a distribution is allowed to be: Empirical() represents a distribution by a random sample rather than by parameters, and numerical fallbacks now fill in cdf(), pdf(), quantile(), random() and the moments for any object that implements only some of them. New score() and hessian() generics compute first and second derivatives of the log-likelihood with respect to the parameters, analytically for a few distributions and numerically for the rest.
Growth used to arrive as new distribution families contributed from outside - the extreme-value set, Erlang, later the Poisson binomial. This release changes the axis: alongside two new distributions it adds an inference layer (score, hessian) and a forecast-evaluation one (crps() methods against scoringRules), which are capabilities about distributions rather than more of them. Dependency weight is being cut at the same time, with ggplot2 demoted to Suggests and glue replaced by base R sprintf().
With numeric fallbacks and the derivative generics in place, expect analytic score() and hessian() methods to be filled in across more of the distribution catalogue. The constructor-default change is the likeliest source of follow-up fixes, since calls like Poisson() now return a length-zero distribution where they previously errored.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either contentanalysis or distributions3.
Whatagraph keeps fixing what breaks when one account runs a thousand sources.
Lightdash keeps handing authoring to outside agents and keeping the governed layer for itself.
A 4.4.0 tag appears, but the feed carries only its release plumbing
Basedash keeps pushing its data out of the workspace — now to people without accounts
RStudio ships through release branches, and the notes are commit messages
dbt Fusion's second beta is adapter work: ClickHouse gets materializations, indexes, and catalogs
See all contentanalysis alternatives → · See all distributions3 alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. distributions3 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. distributions3 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top contentanalysis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "contentanalysis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/contentanalysis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top distributions3 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "distributions3 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/distributions3-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.