← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

Convex vs Rivet

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Convex and Rivet — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Convex vs Rivet: at a glance

FeatureConvexRivet
SectorDevOpsDevOps
Velocity score2.57.5
Sparks · 30d02
Top themesfunding, reactive-backend, enterprise, agentsactors, serverless, storage engine, s3
Last editorial update2mo ago3d ago
WebsiteVisit →—

What is Convex?

Convex raised $57M on the argument that agents need a backend built for them.

The feed is thin on releases and heavy on company milestones. A $57M Series B led by Insight Partners is the newest item, pitched around developers and their agents writing software together and needing a backend that keeps up. The substantive product news remains April's Convex for Enterprise, which added the compliance and scale posture the platform previously lacked; since then the feed carries a conference announcement and open-source recaps rather than shipped capability.

Read the full Convex trajectory →

What is Rivet?

Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.

Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.

Read the full Rivet trajectory →

Convex vs Rivet: editorial side-by-side

C
Convex
DEVOPS
2.5

Convex raised $57M on the argument that agents need a backend built for them.

◆ Current state

The feed is thin on releases and heavy on company milestones. A $57M Series B led by Insight Partners is the newest item, pitched around developers and their agents writing software together and needing a backend that keeps up. The substantive product news remains April's Convex for Enterprise, which added the compliance and scale posture the platform previously lacked; since then the feed carries a conference announcement and open-source recaps rather than shipped capability.

◆ Where it's heading

Convex is funding and positioning ahead of shipping. The enterprise release established the upmarket motion and the funding narrative attaches it to agent-written code, but nothing in the visible window shows the agent-facing product surface that framing implies. Whether that framing is real or aspirational is not something this feed answers yet.

◆ Prediction

With the round announced around agent workloads, the next substantive release is most likely on that surface, though the entries here give no detail on what form it takes.

R
Rivet
DEVOPS
7.5

Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.

◆ Current state

Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.

◆ Where it's heading

Each release removes operational burden: BYOC moved the control plane into the customer's cloud, and 3.0 reduces the self-hosted footprint to one binary plus an S3 bucket. The agent work (Pi, agentOS) sits on top as the main workload Rivet is courting.

◆ Prediction

Expect benchmarks and migration guidance for 2.x users during the preview, followed by a 3.0 GA. The entry gives no performance numbers, so the SSD-speed claim is unverified.

Alternatives to Convex and Rivet

Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Convex or Rivet.

See all Convex alternatives → · See all Rivet alternatives →

Recent activity from Convex and Rivet

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3d agoRivetIntroducing Rivet 3.0 Preview ⚡
  2. 17d agoRivetIntroducing agentOS 0.4 & Hosted VMs
  3. 22d agoRivetIntroducing Pi Durable for Rivet
  4. 24d agoRivetReplacing Our Message Broker with... S3? ⚡
  5. 28d agoRivetIntroducing Pi 1.0 for Rivet
  6. 1mo agoRivetIntroducing JWT Authentication for Rivet Actors
  7. 2mo agoConvexConvex raises a $57M Series B
  8. 5mo agoConvexWe're organizing a conference
  9. 6mo agoConvexConvex's 2025 open-source contributions, recapped
  10. 6mo agoConvexConvex for Enterprise (and updates to everything else) ⚡
  11. 8mo agoConvexJust landed in Europe
  12. 9mo agoConvexConvex Open Source Update

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Convex and Rivet?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 2.5), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Convex better than Rivet?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 2.5), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Convex?

Top Convex alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Convex alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/convex for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Rivet?

Top Rivet alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rivet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rivet for the full list with editorial commentary on each.