Whatagraph
Whatagraph keeps fixing what breaks when one account runs a thousand sources.
Comparison · Analytics
delaporte vs NocoDB
A side-by-side editorial comparison of delaporte and NocoDB — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
delaporte vs NocoDB: at a glance
What is delaporte?
A Fortran-backed Delaporte distribution package where every release is compiler and CRAN weather.
Delaporte supplies the density, distribution, quantile and random-generation functions for the Delaporte distribution — a Poisson-negative-binomial convolution used for overdispersed count data — implemented in Fortran and called through C. The only user-facing addition in the visible history is explicit OpenMP thread control via getDelapThreads() and setDelapThreads() at 8.2.0.
What is NocoDB?
Interfaces gets the permissions layer it needed, one release after launching.
NocoDB ships monthly, and the last two releases are a launch and its follow-through. 2026.08.0 introduced Interfaces, custom app surfaces built over a base; 2026.08.1 gives that layer what it was missing — per-dashboard visibility and editing permissions, field edit permissions enforced on interface pages, team-granted access, and page reordering. Alongside it the grid gains realtime presence with per-collaborator colours and jump-to-cursor, folders for grouping tables and views, up to three frozen fields, and nested records in List View.
delaporte vs NocoDB: editorial side-by-side
delaporte
0.0ANALYTICS
A Fortran-backed Delaporte distribution package where every release is compiler and CRAN weather.
◆ Current state
Delaporte supplies the density, distribution, quantile and random-generation functions for the Delaporte distribution — a Poisson-negative-binomial convolution used for overdispersed count data — implemented in Fortran and called through C. The only user-facing addition in the visible history is explicit OpenMP thread control via getDelapThreads() and setDelapThreads() at 8.2.0.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintenance burden here is portability, not statistics. Recent entries track a Fortran suffix change for Intel compiler compatibility, architecture-specific test tolerances, type-safety corrections on values crossing the C-to-Fortran boundary, and a thread-count variable relocated from R options to an environment variable to follow an upstream R commit. The distribution functions themselves are settled; what changes is how the compiled code is built and checked across CRAN's platform matrix.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to follow another CRAN toolchain or Writing R Extensions policy change, as the last several have. Two of the four visible entries carry no notes at all, so this feed will keep understating what actually shipped.
NocoDB
6.3ANALYTICS
Interfaces gets the permissions layer it needed, one release after launching.
◆ Current state
NocoDB ships monthly, and the last two releases are a launch and its follow-through. 2026.08.0 introduced Interfaces, custom app surfaces built over a base; 2026.08.1 gives that layer what it was missing — per-dashboard visibility and editing permissions, field edit permissions enforced on interface pages, team-granted access, and page reordering. Alongside it the grid gains realtime presence with per-collaborator colours and jump-to-cursor, folders for grouping tables and views, up to three frozen fields, and nested records in List View.
◆ Where it's heading
The pattern is consistent: NocoDB launches a surface, then spends the next release making it governable and usable at team scale. Presence and folders are collaboration parity rather than new direction — the directional bet was Interfaces, and this release is that bet being made safe for the eighty people who only need to approve something. The permission system is now the same one across tables, fields, dashboards, and interface pages, which is the consolidation that makes the app layer sellable.
◆ Prediction
Write-back actions and embedding are the remaining pieces app builders expect from Interfaces, and the availability tables in each release suggest they land on the paid tier.
Alternatives to delaporte and NocoDB
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either delaporte or NocoDB.
Lightdash
Lightdash keeps handing authoring to outside agents and keeping the governed layer for itself.
Delta Lake
A 4.4.0 tag appears, but the feed carries only its release plumbing
distributions3
distributions3 0.3.0 adds sample-based distributions and likelihood derivatives
Basedash
Basedash keeps pushing its data out of the workspace — now to people without accounts
RStudio
RStudio ships through release branches, and the notes are commit messages
See all delaporte alternatives → · See all NocoDB alternatives →
Recent activity from delaporte and NocoDB
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoNocoDB2026.08.1 : Introducing Realtime Presence and Folders
- 15d agoNocoDB2026.08.0 : Introducing Interfaces ⚡
- 1mo agoNocoDB2026.07.0 : Introducing Calendar Sync & Image Annotations
- 1mo agoNocoDB2026.06.2 : Introducing Oracle Database Support
- 2mo agoNocoDB2026.06.1: tsgo typechecking and rspack bump
- 2mo agoNocoDB2026.06.0: Bounded group-by fetch retries
- 1y agodelaporteThread limit moves to an environment variable; Fortran type checks tightened
- 3y agodelaporteExplicit OpenMP thread control functions added
- 3y agodelaporteCRAN release 8.1.1
- 3y agodelaporteCRAN release 8.1.0
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between delaporte and NocoDB?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. NocoDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is delaporte better than NocoDB?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. NocoDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to delaporte?
Top delaporte alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "delaporte alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/delaporte for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to NocoDB?
Top NocoDB alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "NocoDB alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nocodb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.