← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

distributions3 vs treeshap

A side-by-side editorial comparison of distributions3 and treeshap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

distributions3 vs treeshap: at a glance

Featuredistributions3treeshap
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score6.30.0
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesr-package, probability-distributions, empirical-distributions, likelihood-inferenceshap, model explainability, tree ensembles, r package
Last editorial update3h ago4d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is distributions3?

distributions3 0.3.0 adds sample-based distributions and likelihood derivatives

An R package giving probability distributions a consistent object interface - d/p/q/r functions, moments, and prodist() methods that pull a fitted distribution out of a regression object. Version 0.3.0 is the first substantive release under Achim Zeileis's maintenance, and it widens what a distribution is allowed to be: Empirical() represents a distribution by a random sample rather than by parameters, and numerical fallbacks now fill in cdf(), pdf(), quantile(), random() and the moments for any object that implements only some of them. New score() and hessian() generics compute first and second derivatives of the log-likelihood with respect to the parameters, analytically for a few distributions and numerically for the rest.

Read the full distributions3 trajectory →

What is treeshap?

treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.

treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.

Read the full treeshap trajectory →

distributions3 vs treeshap: editorial side-by-side

D6.3

distributions3 0.3.0 adds sample-based distributions and likelihood derivatives

◆ Current state

An R package giving probability distributions a consistent object interface - d/p/q/r functions, moments, and prodist() methods that pull a fitted distribution out of a regression object. Version 0.3.0 is the first substantive release under Achim Zeileis's maintenance, and it widens what a distribution is allowed to be: Empirical() represents a distribution by a random sample rather than by parameters, and numerical fallbacks now fill in cdf(), pdf(), quantile(), random() and the moments for any object that implements only some of them. New score() and hessian() generics compute first and second derivatives of the log-likelihood with respect to the parameters, analytically for a few distributions and numerically for the rest.

◆ Where it's heading

Growth used to arrive as new distribution families contributed from outside - the extreme-value set, Erlang, later the Poisson binomial. This release changes the axis: alongside two new distributions it adds an inference layer (score, hessian) and a forecast-evaluation one (crps() methods against scoringRules), which are capabilities about distributions rather than more of them. Dependency weight is being cut at the same time, with ggplot2 demoted to Suggests and glue replaced by base R sprintf().

◆ Prediction

With numeric fallbacks and the derivative generics in place, expect analytic score() and hessian() methods to be filled in across more of the distribution catalogue. The constructor-default change is the likeliest source of follow-up fixes, since calls like Poisson() now return a length-zero distribution where they previously errored.

T
treeshap
ANALYTICS
0.0

treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.

◆ Current state

treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is breadth of model support rather than new explanation methods: every release since the first CRAN submission adds or repairs a unify() backend. Maintenance is community-driven, with named contributors fixing the framework they personally use. Nothing in these entries points at work on the SHAP algorithms themselves.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to add or repair another unify() adapter as a contributor brings their own framework, rather than to change how explanations are computed.

Alternatives to distributions3 and treeshap

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either distributions3 or treeshap.

See all distributions3 alternatives → · See all treeshap alternatives →

Recent activity from distributions3 and treeshap

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4h agodistributions3Empirical distributions, plus score and hessian generics
  2. 29d agodistributions3Maintenance moves to Achim Zeileis; moment calculations corrected
  3. 3mo agotreeshapGPBoost support lands; xgboost adapter repaired
  4. 10mo agodistributions3ggplot2 compatibility for the plotting functions
  5. 1y agodistributions3Poisson binomial distribution, with a normal-approximation fallback
  6. 2y agotreeshapFixes broken lightgbm.unify examples
  7. 2y agotreeshapMulti-output model explanations added
  8. 2y agotreeshapFirst CRAN release consolidates the unify() adapters
  9. 3y agodistributions3is_discrete and is_continuous generics, plus elementwise type-safety
  10. 4y agodistributions3Extreme-value family, Erlang, and a plotting generic

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between distributions3 and treeshap?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. distributions3 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is distributions3 better than treeshap?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. distributions3 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to distributions3?

Top distributions3 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "distributions3 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/distributions3-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to treeshap?

Top treeshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "treeshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/treeshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.