← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

performance vs Fulcrum

A side-by-side editorial comparison of performance and Fulcrum — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

performance vs Fulcrum: at a glance

FeatureperformanceFulcrum
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-language, model-diagnostics, bayesian, easystatsgis, esri-migration, offline-maps, field-data-capture
Last editorial update7d ago4h ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is performance?

performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.

performance is at 0.17.1, which added check_priors() for prior predictive checks on Bayesian models and gave check_overdispersion(), check_model() and check_predictions() arguments to control residual type and plot range. The releases before it are a similar mix: a -2LL criterion column in test_likelihoodratio(), Bayesian predictive checks routed through modelbased, and in 0.16.0 a set of breaking renames including RMSA to the correct RMSR.

Read the full performance trajectory →

What is Fulcrum?

Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.

Fulcrum is a field data collection platform, and nearly every entry in the last month touches mapping. The web app ships weekly fix batches for layer rendering (KML/KMZ, MBTiles, ArcGIS Feature Services), while iOS and Android push near-weekly builds against the ArcGIS SDK. The newest iOS build turns to app-level responsiveness - database queries moved off the main path and the record editor kept interactive while Photo FastFill works in the background.

Read the full Fulcrum trajectory →

performance vs Fulcrum: editorial side-by-side

P
performance
ANALYTICS
0.0

performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.

◆ Current state

performance is at 0.17.1, which added check_priors() for prior predictive checks on Bayesian models and gave check_overdispersion(), check_model() and check_predictions() arguments to control residual type and plot range. The releases before it are a similar mix: a -2LL criterion column in test_likelihoodratio(), Bayesian predictive checks routed through modelbased, and in 0.16.0 a set of breaking renames including RMSA to the correct RMSR.

◆ Where it's heading

Two consistent habits. Diagnostics keep gaining arguments to narrow what is examined — ppc_range, x_limits, maximum_dots, show_ci — which reads as a package being used on models large and awkward enough that the defaults stopped working. And simulated residuals via DHARMa keep displacing standard ones as the basis for the checks themselves.

◆ Prediction

With check_priors() newly added and Bayesian predictive checks now routed through modelbased, the next release most likely extends the Bayesian diagnostic set rather than reworking the frequentist checks.

F
Fulcrum
ANALYTICS
6.3

Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.

◆ Current state

Fulcrum is a field data collection platform, and nearly every entry in the last month touches mapping. The web app ships weekly fix batches for layer rendering (KML/KMZ, MBTiles, ArcGIS Feature Services), while iOS and Android push near-weekly builds against the ArcGIS SDK. The newest iOS build turns to app-level responsiveness - database queries moved off the main path and the record editor kept interactive while Photo FastFill works in the background.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is a full consolidation onto Esri. The legacy Google Maps engine retires on September 1 with automatic migration for anyone who has not switched, and Esri now carries Google's satellite and street basemaps so the imagery argument is neutralized. Underneath, the mobile SDK moved to ArcGIS 300.0.0 and ONNX on-device inference gave way to a new INFERENCE format. Two capabilities are visibly staged behind early access rather than shipped: Photo FastFill, and a GPS integration still described as Alpha.

◆ Prediction

Expect the weeks before September 1 to stay dominated by migration-shaped fixes and Esri parity work, with Photo FastFill the nearer of the two early-access programs to general availability given it is already running in shipped builds.

Alternatives to performance and Fulcrum

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either performance or Fulcrum.

See all performance alternatives → · See all Fulcrum alternatives →

Recent activity from performance and Fulcrum

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoFulcrumiOS: async database queries, non-blocking Photo FastFill
  2. 5d agoFulcrumWeb fixes: shared-view exports, MBTiles popups, KML and ArcGIS layers
  3. 7d agoFulcrumAndroid: update offline map layers in place, non-blocking Photo FastFill
  4. 8d agoFulcrumiOS fix: slow location resolution blocked record saves
  5. 13d agoFulcrumWeb: SSO email wording and ArcGIS/deck.gl version bumps
  6. 14d agoFulcrumAndroid fixes: ArcGIS stability, signature button, photo markup
  7. 1mo agoperformancecheck_priors() added; overdispersion plots use simulated residuals
  8. 2mo agoperformance-2LL criterion column and unified Bayesian predictive checks
  9. 6mo agoperformanceBreaking renames plus point-count and CI controls in check_model()
  10. 8mo agoperformancecheck_autocorrelation() methods for DHARMa objects
  11. 10mo agoperformanceFixes CRAN checks after an rstanarm update
  12. 11mo agoperformancetinytable output format in display()

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between performance and Fulcrum?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is performance better than Fulcrum?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to performance?

Top performance alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "performance alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/easystats-performance for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Fulcrum?

Top Fulcrum alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fulcrum alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fulcrum for the full list with editorial commentary on each.