← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

forestploter vs phyloatlas

A side-by-side editorial comparison of forestploter and phyloatlas — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

forestploter vs phyloatlas: at a glance

Featureforestploterphyloatlas
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdata-visualization, clinical-trials, forest-plots, meta-analysisphylogenetics, research-data, data-provenance, open-science
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is forestploter?

A forest plot package that keeps handing users control of one more graphical detail.

forestploter draws forest plots where the layout is driven by the data frame itself, so text columns and confidence intervals sit in the same grid. The theme function has become the package's centre of gravity: it now controls graphical parameters for titles, legends, axis, arrow labels, footnotes, and reference lines, with multi-column and row-order legend controls added most recently. Two releases shipped nine minutes apart in April 2026 after a two-year gap, deprecating some theme parameters, removing inter-cell gaps, and improving tick breaks.

Read the full forestploter trajectory →

What is phyloatlas?

An atlas of the tree of life that keeps publishing what it got wrong, and stopped shipping the trees it does not own.

This is a curated deposit of species-level phylogenies — 264 trees across 62 partitions, 247 of them time-calibrated — paired with a species-name dictionary of roughly 638,000 standardized labels and per-tree provenance. It is moving through peer review at Methods in Ecology and Evolution, and the release stream is essentially a public erratum log: eight releases in five weeks, each reconciling the deposit against source papers, the manuscript, and its own metadata. The most recent replaced the turtle canonical with a 274-tip ultrametric chronogram after the previous tree failed time-calibration integrity checks.

Read the full phyloatlas trajectory →

forestploter vs phyloatlas: editorial side-by-side

F
forestploter
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A forest plot package that keeps handing users control of one more graphical detail.

◆ Current state

forestploter draws forest plots where the layout is driven by the data frame itself, so text columns and confidence intervals sit in the same grid. The theme function has become the package's centre of gravity: it now controls graphical parameters for titles, legends, axis, arrow labels, footnotes, and reference lines, with multi-column and row-order legend controls added most recently. Two releases shipped nine minutes apart in April 2026 after a two-year gap, deprecating some theme parameters, removing inter-cell gaps, and improving tick breaks.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction has been consistent for four years: whatever a user might want to restyle eventually becomes an argument. Point size stopped being transformed, cell height adjustment was removed as unwanted, legends gained size, column, and fill-order control, and vertical lines learned to extend the full plot height and to draw beneath the whiskers. The one structural move was 1.1.0, which let callers supply their own confidence-interval and summary drawing functions — turning a fixed renderer into an extensible one. Everything since has been the arguments that extensibility did not cover.

◆ Prediction

The latest release deprecates theme parameters rather than adding them, which suggests the next one consolidates the theme surface that has grown for four years rather than extending it further.

P
phyloatlas
INFRA · APIS
0.0

An atlas of the tree of life that keeps publishing what it got wrong, and stopped shipping the trees it does not own.

◆ Current state

This is a curated deposit of species-level phylogenies — 264 trees across 62 partitions, 247 of them time-calibrated — paired with a species-name dictionary of roughly 638,000 standardized labels and per-tree provenance. It is moving through peer review at Methods in Ecology and Evolution, and the release stream is essentially a public erratum log: eight releases in five weeks, each reconciling the deposit against source papers, the manuscript, and its own metadata. The most recent replaced the turtle canonical with a 274-tip ultrametric chronogram after the previous tree failed time-calibration integrity checks.

◆ Where it's heading

The project's defining decision is that it archives the recipe rather than the corpus. Since 1.0.3 the Zenodo deposit holds metadata, provenance, and standardization code while the tree files live at their original sources, and the same principle was applied again when the TimeTree-of-Life was removed at the TimeTree project's request and reduced to a citation. What makes the correction log unusual is its direction: partitions keep getting reclassified from dated to undated as verification confirms the source papers described chronograms they never deposited. The atlas is being built to be honest about archival uncertainty rather than to maximize coverage.

◆ Prediction

The release cadence is driven by the manuscript review cycle, so expect corrections to continue until MEE acceptance and then slow sharply; the open thread most likely to produce the next one is the remaining recoverable archival uncertainty flagged across non-Condamine dated source trees.

Alternatives to forestploter and phyloatlas

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either forestploter or phyloatlas.

See all forestploter alternatives → · See all phyloatlas alternatives →

Recent activity from forestploter and phyloatlas

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agophyloatlasv1.0.8 — turtle chronogram canonical; MEE integrity pass
  2. 1mo agophyloatlasv1.0.7 — restore species-name dictionary
  3. 1mo agophyloatlasv1.0.6 — data-integrity corrections + TimeTree de-redistribution
  4. 2mo agophyloatlasv1.0.5 — consistency corrections
  5. 2mo agophyloatlasv1.0.4 — data corrections + canonical succession (Supplementary Table S7)
  6. 2mo agophyloatlasv1.0.3 — title alignment, LICENSE, three-category framework, sensitivity bounds
  7. 3mo agoforestploterTheme parameters deprecated; cell gaps removed, ticks improved
  8. 3mo agoforestploterMulti-column legends and full-height vertical lines
  9. 2y agoforestploterFull graphical control over titles, legends, axis and footnotes
  10. 2y agoforestploterTick digit calculation improved; automatic cell height removed
  11. 3y agoforestploterCustom CI and summary drawing functions; boxplots inside the plot
  12. 3y agoforestploterArbitrary grobs and math symbols can be placed in cells

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between forestploter and phyloatlas?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. forestploter and phyloatlas are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is forestploter better than phyloatlas?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. forestploter and phyloatlas are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to forestploter?

Top forestploter alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forestploter alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forestploter for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to phyloatlas?

Top phyloatlas alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "phyloatlas alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/phylo-species-atlas for the full list with editorial commentary on each.