← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Glances vs NocoDB

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Glances and NocoDB — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Glances vs NocoDB: at a glance

FeatureGlancesNocoDB
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.56.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themessystem monitoring, security audit, gpu monitoring, rest apino-code-database, interfaces, permissions, realtime-collaboration
Last editorial update12d ago14h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Glances?

Every Glances release this year has carried CVE fixes — the monitoring tool is being audited in public.

Six releases since March, and all but one ship security patches. 4.5.2 alone corrected eight CVEs: CORS defaults allowing cross-origin credential theft, incomplete secrets redaction leaking password hashes and SNMP credentials through /api/v4/args, missing host validation leaving the REST API open to DNS rebinding, SQL injection in the DuckDB export, command injection through process names in action templates, and credential leakage via Zeroconf-spoofed browser autodiscovery. The pattern continues through 4.5.3, 4.5.4, 4.5.5 and 4.5.6, the last fixing a value-level bypass that leaked credentials embedded in URL config values. Alongside it, hardware coverage keeps widening — Intel and AMD GPUs, NVIDIA Jetson, Rockchip NPU and MPP, Raspberry Pi VideoCore.

Read the full Glances trajectory →

What is NocoDB?

Interfaces gets the permissions layer it needed, one release after launching.

NocoDB ships monthly, and the last two releases are a launch and its follow-through. 2026.08.0 introduced Interfaces, custom app surfaces built over a base; 2026.08.1 gives that layer what it was missing — per-dashboard visibility and editing permissions, field edit permissions enforced on interface pages, team-granted access, and page reordering. Alongside it the grid gains realtime presence with per-collaborator colours and jump-to-cursor, folders for grouping tables and views, up to three frozen fields, and nested records in List View.

Read the full NocoDB trajectory →

Glances vs NocoDB: editorial side-by-side

G
Glances
ANALYTICS
2.5

Every Glances release this year has carried CVE fixes — the monitoring tool is being audited in public.

◆ Current state

Six releases since March, and all but one ship security patches. 4.5.2 alone corrected eight CVEs: CORS defaults allowing cross-origin credential theft, incomplete secrets redaction leaking password hashes and SNMP credentials through /api/v4/args, missing host validation leaving the REST API open to DNS rebinding, SQL injection in the DuckDB export, command injection through process names in action templates, and credential leakage via Zeroconf-spoofed browser autodiscovery. The pattern continues through 4.5.3, 4.5.4, 4.5.5 and 4.5.6, the last fixing a value-level bypass that leaked credentials embedded in URL config values. Alongside it, hardware coverage keeps widening — Intel and AMD GPUs, NVIDIA Jetson, Rockchip NPU and MPP, Raspberry Pi VideoCore.

◆ Where it's heading

This is what it looks like when a tool that grew up as a local terminal dashboard gets taken seriously as a network service. Nearly every advisory in the window comes from the same root assumption — that the REST API, XML-RPC server and autodiscovery browser are on a trusted network — and the fixes are systematically removing that assumption: authentication warnings on startup, host validation, tighter CORS, redaction that covers values as well as keys. The feature work continues in parallel and is almost entirely about reading more kinds of hardware.

◆ Prediction

The advisories have moved from transport-level exposure toward data-level leaks in specific endpoints, which suggests the remaining audit surface is the export backends and config serialisation rather than the servers themselves. Expect the next release to follow the same shape: hardware plugin additions plus another round of endpoint fixes.

N
NocoDB
ANALYTICS
6.3

Interfaces gets the permissions layer it needed, one release after launching.

◆ Current state

NocoDB ships monthly, and the last two releases are a launch and its follow-through. 2026.08.0 introduced Interfaces, custom app surfaces built over a base; 2026.08.1 gives that layer what it was missing — per-dashboard visibility and editing permissions, field edit permissions enforced on interface pages, team-granted access, and page reordering. Alongside it the grid gains realtime presence with per-collaborator colours and jump-to-cursor, folders for grouping tables and views, up to three frozen fields, and nested records in List View.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is consistent: NocoDB launches a surface, then spends the next release making it governable and usable at team scale. Presence and folders are collaboration parity rather than new direction — the directional bet was Interfaces, and this release is that bet being made safe for the eighty people who only need to approve something. The permission system is now the same one across tables, fields, dashboards, and interface pages, which is the consolidation that makes the app layer sellable.

◆ Prediction

Write-back actions and embedding are the remaining pieces app builders expect from Interfaces, and the availability tables in each release suggest they land on the paid tier.

Alternatives to Glances and NocoDB

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Glances or NocoDB.

See all Glances alternatives → · See all NocoDB alternatives →

Recent activity from Glances and NocoDB

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 16h agoNocoDB2026.08.1 : Introducing Realtime Presence and Folders
  2. 14d agoNocoDB2026.08.0 : Introducing Interfaces
  3. 18d agoGlancesCredential leak via URL values in /api/4/config
  4. 1mo agoNocoDB2026.07.0 : Introducing Calendar Sync & Image Annotations
  5. 1mo agoNocoDB2026.06.2 : Introducing Oracle Database Support
  6. 2mo agoNocoDB2026.06.1: tsgo typechecking and rspack bump
  7. 2mo agoGlancesContainer API latency, ARM GPU monitoring, and an AMP command-execution fix
  8. 2mo agoNocoDB2026.06.0: Bounded group-by fetch retries
  9. 4mo agoGlancesRockchip MPP and NPU monitoring, plus three CVE corrections
  10. 4mo agoGlancesLXC/LXD support, ClickHouse export, and two CVE mitigations
  11. 5mo agoGlancesEight CVEs corrected in one release
  12. 5mo agoGlancesStability fixes, Intel GPU monitoring, and container health alerting

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Glances and NocoDB?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. NocoDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Glances better than NocoDB?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. NocoDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Glances?

Top Glances alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Glances alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glances for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to NocoDB?

Top NocoDB alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "NocoDB alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nocodb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.