← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Holistics vs kernelshap

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Holistics and kernelshap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Holistics vs kernelshap: at a glance

FeatureHolisticskernelshap
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score5.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbusiness-intelligence, ai-governance, data-redaction, analytics-as-codeshap, model explainability, sampling algorithms, numerical correctness
Last editorial update12h ago4d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Holistics?

Holistics keeps fencing in the AI layer it spent the summer building.

Holistics ships small, frequent notes - often one or two sentences - across three strands: AI features in Explore and Chat, as-code control of presentation through AML, and workspace hygiene like file history and dark mode. The August entries are entirely about the AI layer's edges rather than its capabilities: an AI user attribute for restricting what the assistant can reach, and now redaction of the data it is allowed to see. Bodies are frequently a single line, so scope has to be read from the headline and the release-note URL.

Read the full Holistics trajectory →

What is kernelshap?

kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.

kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.

Read the full kernelshap trajectory →

Holistics vs kernelshap: editorial side-by-side

Holistics logo
Holistics
ANALYTICS
5.0

Holistics keeps fencing in the AI layer it spent the summer building.

◆ Current state

Holistics ships small, frequent notes - often one or two sentences - across three strands: AI features in Explore and Chat, as-code control of presentation through AML, and workspace hygiene like file history and dark mode. The August entries are entirely about the AI layer's edges rather than its capabilities: an AI user attribute for restricting what the assistant can reach, and now redaction of the data it is allowed to see. Bodies are frequently a single line, so scope has to be read from the headline and the release-note URL.

◆ Where it's heading

The AI work has moved through a recognizable sequence: capability first with chart suggestions, then observability with AI Chat Insights for admins, then access control with an AI-specific user attribute, and now field-level redaction. Access control decides which rows the assistant can reach; redaction decides what it may see inside them - the same governance thread at finer grain. Alongside it, Holistics keeps pulling presentation into AML - custom charts, theme palettes, currency formats - so what analysts used to click is versioned as code.

◆ Prediction

With reach and visibility both now constrained, the remaining gap is accountability - logging what the assistant answered against which data - though the one-line release notes rarely signal scope far enough ahead to read the next step confidently.

K
kernelshap
ANALYTICS
0.0

kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.

◆ Current state

kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.

◆ Where it's heading

Two concerns drive this package: making exact methods reach further, and being demonstrably right. The first shows in the additive explainer, the optional background dataset and the sampling permutation algorithm; the second in unit tests written against Python's shap, credited fixes from outside contributors, and a willingness to ship a correctness fix that changes numbers people have already published. Speed work runs continuously underneath — direct solves replacing the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse, roughly 10% less memory.

◆ Prediction

The 0.6.0 and 0.7.0 notes each promised a stable 1.0.0 that has not arrived; with the weighting bug fixed and parallelism reworked, a 1.0 release is the most plausible next step.

Alternatives to Holistics and kernelshap

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Holistics or kernelshap.

See all Holistics alternatives → · See all kernelshap alternatives →

Recent activity from Holistics and kernelshap

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3d agoHolisticsAI user attribute restricts AI access to sensitive data
  2. 3d agoHolisticsRedact data exposed to the AI assistant
  3. 17d agoHolisticsCustom currency and unit formats, per field
  4. 20d agoHolisticsFile history: per-file version timeline and restore
  5. 23d agoHolisticsCustom charts become AML code with GUI authoring
  6. 24d agoHolisticsColor palettes can be assigned at the theme level
  7. 1y agokernelshapKernel weight bug fixed; parallelism moves to doFuture
  8. 1y agokernelshapSampling permutation SHAP with standard errors
  9. 2y agokernelshapBackground data now optional; ranger survival support
  10. 2y agokernelshapFactor-valued predictions dropped
  11. 2y agokernelshapadditive_shap() explains additive models exactly
  12. 2y agokernelshapFaster on plain data.frames

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Holistics and kernelshap?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Holistics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Holistics better than kernelshap?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Holistics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Holistics?

Top Holistics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Holistics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/holistics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to kernelshap?

Top kernelshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kernelshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kernelshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.