← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Holistics vs rbmi

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Holistics and rbmi — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Holistics vs rbmi: at a glance

FeatureHolisticsrbmi
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score5.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbusiness-intelligence, ai-governance, analytics-as-code, access-controlclinical-trials, missing-data, multiple-imputation, pharmaverse
Last editorial update1d ago4d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Holistics?

Holistics is adding governance to the AI layer it spent the summer building.

Holistics ships small, frequent notes - often one or two sentences - covering three strands at once: AI features in Explore and Chat, as-code control over presentation through AML, and workspace hygiene like file history and dark mode. The August entries turn to the AI layer's edges rather than its capabilities, with an AI user attribute for restricting what the assistant can reach. Several entries are barely a line long, so scope frequently has to be read from the headline.

Read the full Holistics trajectory →

What is rbmi?

Reference-based multiple imputation for trials, now shipping without Bayesian support by default.

rbmi implements reference-based multiple imputation for longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values — the estimand machinery regulators expect for handling intercurrent events and dropout. The consequential recent change was 1.3.0 moving rstan from a hard dependency to Suggests, which takes Bayesian imputation out of the default install. Since then the work has been documentation and nomenclature discipline: 1.6.1 standardized on MNAR over a mixed NMAR/MNAR vocabulary and deprecated the nmar.rm argument accordingly.

Read the full rbmi trajectory →

Holistics vs rbmi: editorial side-by-side

Holistics logo
Holistics
ANALYTICS
5.0

Holistics is adding governance to the AI layer it spent the summer building.

◆ Current state

Holistics ships small, frequent notes - often one or two sentences - covering three strands at once: AI features in Explore and Chat, as-code control over presentation through AML, and workspace hygiene like file history and dark mode. The August entries turn to the AI layer's edges rather than its capabilities, with an AI user attribute for restricting what the assistant can reach. Several entries are barely a line long, so scope frequently has to be read from the headline.

◆ Where it's heading

The AI work has moved through a recognizable sequence: capability first with chart suggestions, then observability with AI Chat Insights for admins, and now access control with an AI-specific user attribute. Alongside it, Holistics keeps pulling presentation into AML - custom charts, theme palettes, currency formats - so the things analysts used to click are versioned as code. File history is the join between the two threads, giving every dashboard, model, and dataset its own restorable timeline.

◆ Prediction

With capability, visibility, and access control now in place for the AI layer, the next step is likely audit or policy depth - logging what the assistant answered against which data - rather than new AI surfaces.

R
rbmi
ANALYTICS
2.5

Reference-based multiple imputation for trials, now shipping without Bayesian support by default.

◆ Current state

rbmi implements reference-based multiple imputation for longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values — the estimand machinery regulators expect for handling intercurrent events and dropout. The consequential recent change was 1.3.0 moving rstan from a hard dependency to Suggests, which takes Bayesian imputation out of the default install. Since then the work has been documentation and nomenclature discipline: 1.6.1 standardized on MNAR over a mixed NMAR/MNAR vocabulary and deprecated the nmar.rm argument accordingly.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is optimizing for adoption friction over feature breadth. Dropping a compiled Stan dependency from the default install, deprecating a bespoke seed argument in favor of base set.seed(), and aligning lsmeans() behavior and weight naming with emmeans all point the same direction — behave like a conventional R package rather than a specialized one. Documentation work in 1.6.1 covering @return on every exported function and executable examples reads as preparation for validation scrutiny rather than user demand.

◆ Prediction

Given the FAQ vignette's validation statement and the recent documentation completeness pass, the next work is more likely qualification and estimand documentation than new imputation methods.

Alternatives to Holistics and rbmi

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Holistics or rbmi.

See all Holistics alternatives → · See all rbmi alternatives →

Recent activity from Holistics and rbmi

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoHolisticsAI user attribute restricts AI access to sensitive data
  2. 16d agoHolisticsCustom currency and unit formats, per field
  3. 19d agoHolisticsFile history: per-file version timeline and restore
  4. 22d agoHolisticsCustom charts become AML code with GUI authoring
  5. 23d agoHolisticsColor palettes can be assigned at the theme level
  6. 27d agorbmiMNAR nomenclature standardized, documentation completed
  7. 27d agoHolisticsDate-range presets and typed shorthands
  8. 1y agorbmirstan demoted to Suggests, Bayesian imputation now opt-in
  9. 2y agorbmirbmi v1.2.5

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Holistics and rbmi?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Holistics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Holistics better than rbmi?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Holistics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Holistics?

Top Holistics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Holistics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/holistics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rbmi?

Top rbmi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rbmi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rbmi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.