← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

inlabru vs prioritizr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of inlabru and prioritizr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

inlabru vs prioritizr: at a glance

Featureinlabruprioritizr
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian-modelling, spatial-statistics, r-package, api-consolidationconservation-planning, optimization, spatial, target-setting
Last editorial update6h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is inlabru?

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

Read the full inlabru trajectory →

What is prioritizr?

Conservation planning absorbs the literature's target-setting rules as code.

prioritizr builds and solves systematic conservation planning problems, handing them to CBC, HiGHS, Gurobi or SYMPHONY. The last two years moved it onto the sf and terra spatial stack and rewrote its internals as R6 classes; the newest release adds a target-setting layer with seventeen named methods from the conservation literature, plus automatic penalty calibration. Solver control parameters and neighbour penalties arrive in the same release.

Read the full prioritizr trajectory →

inlabru vs prioritizr: editorial side-by-side

I
inlabru
INFRA · APIS
2.5

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

◆ Current state

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc is consolidation of the extension surface rather than expansion of the model catalogue. Every release adds mappers or families with one hand and removes a dependency, a re-export or a deprecated path with the other — plyr in 2.15.0, fmesher's Depends entry in 2.14.1, sp and ggmap in 2.12.0. The compatibility flag bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable and the temporary fm_int/fm_pixels re-exports show a maintainer sequencing breaks across releases instead of landing them together.

◆ Prediction

The 2.14 compatibility flag is still defaulting to TRUE and the fmesher re-exports are described in the entries as temporary, so the next obvious move is a release that flips bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable off and drops those re-exports.

P
prioritizr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Conservation planning absorbs the literature's target-setting rules as code.

◆ Current state

prioritizr builds and solves systematic conservation planning problems, handing them to CBC, HiGHS, Gurobi or SYMPHONY. The last two years moved it onto the sf and terra spatial stack and rewrote its internals as R6 classes; the newest release adds a target-setting layer with seventeen named methods from the conservation literature, plus automatic penalty calibration. Solver control parameters and neighbour penalties arrive in the same release.

◆ Where it's heading

The package keeps absorbing decisions that used to sit with the analyst. Targets were something you computed and passed in; now add_auto_targets() takes a method specification and the published rules from Jung, Rodrigues, Ward, Watson and Wilson are first-class objects. Penalty values were tuned by hand; calibrate_cohon_penalty() searches for them. The same instinct shows in exporting its validation helpers for other packages to vendor.

◆ Prediction

The deprecation of add_loglinear_targets() in favour of a spec function suggests the older manual target helpers are next to be folded into the same interface.

Alternatives to inlabru and prioritizr

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either inlabru or prioritizr.

See all inlabru alternatives → · See all prioritizr alternatives →

Recent activity from inlabru and prioritizr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 23d agoinlabruPredictor linearisation rewritten; broom tidiers, truncated families
  2. 3mo agoinlabruBugfix release: factor contrasts, raster extraction, error classes
  3. 5mo agoinlabruNew mappers, standardised cgeneric support, bru_obs storage refactor
  4. 9mo agoprioritizradd_auto_targets() brings 17 published target-setting methods
  5. 1y agoinlabruMapper classes shortened to bm_*, experimental predictor aggregation
  6. 1y agoinlabruDrops sp and ggmap for an sf-native spatial stack
  7. 2y agoprioritizrDefault portfolio no longer shuffles the optimization problem
  8. 3y agoprioritizrBoundary data rescaling reworked to avoid optimization artifacts
  9. 3y agoprioritizrMoves to sf and terra; internals rewritten as R6 classes
  10. 3y agoprioritizrmaptools, PBSmapping and rgeos dropped as dependencies
  11. 4y agoprioritizrVignette build fixes and lpsymphony remote setup

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between inlabru and prioritizr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is inlabru better than prioritizr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to inlabru?

Top inlabru alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inlabru alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inlabru for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to prioritizr?

Top prioritizr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "prioritizr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/prioritizr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.