← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

inlabru vs usmap

A side-by-side editorial comparison of inlabru and usmap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

inlabru vs usmap: at a glance

Featureinlabruusmap
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian-modelling, spatial-statistics, r-package, api-consolidationcartography, sf, data-packaging, fips
Last editorial update6h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is inlabru?

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

Read the full inlabru trajectory →

What is usmap?

Ten years in, US mapping splits its data out and finally adds Puerto Rico.

usmap plots US state and county maps in an Alaska- and Hawaii-inset projection and joins user data to them by FIPS code. Over the last two years it has been rebuilt underneath: the map data moved out to a companion usmapdata package, the geometry became sf, and a data_year parameter lets a plot match the vintage of the data being plotted. Version 1.0.0 marks ten years of the project and adds Puerto Rico across every function.

Read the full usmap trajectory →

inlabru vs usmap: editorial side-by-side

I
inlabru
INFRA · APIS
2.5

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

◆ Current state

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc is consolidation of the extension surface rather than expansion of the model catalogue. Every release adds mappers or families with one hand and removes a dependency, a re-export or a deprecated path with the other — plyr in 2.15.0, fmesher's Depends entry in 2.14.1, sp and ggmap in 2.12.0. The compatibility flag bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable and the temporary fm_int/fm_pixels re-exports show a maintainer sequencing breaks across releases instead of landing them together.

◆ Prediction

The 2.14 compatibility flag is still defaulting to TRUE and the fmesher re-exports are described in the entries as temporary, so the next obvious move is a release that flips bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable off and drops those re-exports.

U
usmap
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Ten years in, US mapping splits its data out and finally adds Puerto Rico.

◆ Current state

usmap plots US state and county maps in an Alaska- and Hawaii-inset projection and joins user data to them by FIPS code. Over the last two years it has been rebuilt underneath: the map data moved out to a companion usmapdata package, the geometry became sf, and a data_year parameter lets a plot match the vintage of the data being plotted. Version 1.0.0 marks ten years of the project and adds Puerto Rico across every function.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has separated what it draws from how it draws, and that separation is what makes the recent releases possible: annual map vintages ship in usmapdata without touching usmap, and Puerto Rico could be backfilled into every existing year at once. The remaining work is coverage and defaults rather than architecture, and the Puerto Rico exclusion default is already governed by an environment variable rather than a code change.

◆ Prediction

Expect the annual map vintage to keep arriving through usmapdata, with usmap itself changing only where a new territory or a projection default needs handling.

Alternatives to inlabru and usmap

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either inlabru or usmap.

See all inlabru alternatives → · See all usmap alternatives →

Recent activity from inlabru and usmap

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 23d agoinlabruPredictor linearisation rewritten; broom tidiers, truncated families
  2. 3mo agoinlabruBugfix release: factor contrasts, raster extraction, error classes
  3. 5mo agoinlabruNew mappers, standardised cgeneric support, bru_obs storage refactor
  4. 11mo agousmapPuerto Rico added across every usmap function and map year
  5. 1y agoinlabruMapper classes shortened to bm_*, experimental predictor aggregation
  6. 1y agousmapdata_year parameter threaded through the plotting functions
  7. 1y agoinlabruDrops sp and ggmap for an sf-native spatial stack
  8. 2y agousmapPopulation and poverty data refreshed; ggplot2 3.5 legend fix
  9. 2y agousmapMap data becomes sf; usmap_transform() returns geometry
  10. 2y agousmapDocumentation links updated
  11. 2y agousmapMap data extracted to a companion usmapdata package

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between inlabru and usmap?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is inlabru better than usmap?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to inlabru?

Top inlabru alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inlabru alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inlabru for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to usmap?

Top usmap alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "usmap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/usmap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.