humind
The MSNI humanitarian needs framework as code, rewritten and re-broken every year
Comparison · Infra & APIs
inlabru vs Verdaccio
A side-by-side editorial comparison of inlabru and Verdaccio — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
inlabru vs Verdaccio: at a glance
What is inlabru?
A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time
inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.
What is Verdaccio?
Verdaccio's 7.0 line is subtraction — forks dropped, toolchain swapped, tags mostly empty
The next-7 prerelease line is short and almost entirely maintenance. Its one substantive release adopted @verdaccio/server and deleted the local api, web, and storage forks, leaving a thin Storage wrapper behind only to keep callback-based storage plugins working. Everything since has been dependency retargeting, a lint and format toolchain swap, and a tag whose body reads 'chore: trigger release'.
inlabru vs Verdaccio: editorial side-by-side
inlabru
2.5INFRA · APIS
A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time
◆ Current state
inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc is consolidation of the extension surface rather than expansion of the model catalogue. Every release adds mappers or families with one hand and removes a dependency, a re-export or a deprecated path with the other — plyr in 2.15.0, fmesher's Depends entry in 2.14.1, sp and ggmap in 2.12.0. The compatibility flag bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable and the temporary fm_int/fm_pixels re-exports show a maintainer sequencing breaks across releases instead of landing them together.
◆ Prediction
The 2.14 compatibility flag is still defaulting to TRUE and the fmesher re-exports are described in the entries as temporary, so the next obvious move is a release that flips bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable off and drops those re-exports.
Verdaccio
2.5INFRA · APIS
Verdaccio's 7.0 line is subtraction — forks dropped, toolchain swapped, tags mostly empty
◆ Current state
The next-7 prerelease line is short and almost entirely maintenance. Its one substantive release adopted @verdaccio/server and deleted the local api, web, and storage forks, leaving a thin Storage wrapper behind only to keep callback-based storage plugins working. Everything since has been dependency retargeting, a lint and format toolchain swap, and a tag whose body reads 'chore: trigger release'.
◆ Where it's heading
This is consolidation ahead of a major: the project is collapsing code it had been carrying in-tree back onto shared packages and standardising tooling around oxlint and oxfmt. The remaining compatibility shim is the visible unfinished business — it exists purely for legacy plugins, and it is the last thing standing between this line and a clean server dependency.
◆ Prediction
Removing the legacy storage wrapper is the decision this line is heading toward, and it breaks callback-based storage plugins when it lands, so expect it to arrive with the 7.0.0 final rather than in another next tag. Until then the prerelease stream will keep producing tags with no user-visible content.
Alternatives to inlabru and Verdaccio
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either inlabru or Verdaccio.
afcharts
UK government chart styling in ggplot2, chasing ggplot2 v4 and stretching its palette to five.
coga
A gamma-convolution density package that reached completion in 2018 and has coasted since.
smam
Animal-movement models in R, where new stochastic processes arrive years apart.
baseq
A basic DNA and RNA sequence toolkit that went quiet for three years, then jumped to 2.0.
pakret
Package citation for R documents, quietly growing to meet Quarto.
See all inlabru alternatives → · See all Verdaccio alternatives →
Recent activity from inlabru and Verdaccio
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoVerdaccioVerdaccio 7.0.0-next-7.24 is an empty release-trigger tag
- 23d agoinlabruPredictor linearisation rewritten; broom tidiers, truncated families
- 1mo agoVerdaccio7.0.0-next-7.23: oxlint and oxfmt replace eslint and prettier
- 2mo agoVerdaccio7.0.0-next-7.22: dependencies moved to the next-9 tag
- 2mo agoVerdaccio7.0.0-next-7.21: local api, web and storage forks dropped
- 3mo agoinlabruBugfix release: factor contrasts, raster extraction, error classes
- 5mo agoinlabruNew mappers, standardised cgeneric support, bru_obs storage refactor
- 1y agoinlabruMapper classes shortened to bm_*, experimental predictor aggregation
- 1y agoinlabruDrops sp and ggmap for an sf-native spatial stack ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between inlabru and Verdaccio?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. inlabru and Verdaccio are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is inlabru better than Verdaccio?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inlabru and Verdaccio are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to inlabru?
Top inlabru alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inlabru alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inlabru for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Verdaccio?
Top Verdaccio alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Verdaccio alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/verdaccio for the full list with editorial commentary on each.