← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

JointFPM vs samplr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of JointFPM and samplr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

JointFPM vs samplr: at a glance

FeatureJointFPMsamplr
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvival-analysis, recurrent-events, parametric-models, api-stabilitycognitive-science, sampling-algorithms, mcmc, dormant
Last editorial update50m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is JointFPM?

Recurrent-event modelling settles, with mean_no() promoted to stable.

JointFPM fits joint flexible parametric models for a recurrent event process alongside a competing terminal event, and predicts the mean number of events. The visible history runs from bug fixes on the earliest CRAN releases through standardization, integration options and a summary method, ending with mean_no() declared stable. Several changes arrived through outside pull requests.

Read the full JointFPM trajectory →

What is samplr?

A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months

samplr compares human performance against sampling algorithms, giving cognitive scientists the MCMC machinery to test whether people behave like samplers. Its entire public history is three releases: a 1.0.0 in August 2024, a floating-point fix eighteen seconds later, and then nothing until a February 2026 patch. The release notes are unusually thin even by CRAN standards.

Read the full samplr trajectory →

JointFPM vs samplr: editorial side-by-side

J
JointFPM
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Recurrent-event modelling settles, with mean_no() promoted to stable.

◆ Current state

JointFPM fits joint flexible parametric models for a recurrent event process alongside a competing terminal event, and predicts the mean number of events. The visible history runs from bug fixes on the earliest CRAN releases through standardization, integration options and a summary method, ending with mean_no() declared stable. Several changes arrived through outside pull requests.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs from a working estimator toward a usable one: input validation and error messages first, then control over the numerical integration, then a summary method and pass-through arguments to the underlying rstpm2 fit. The latest release adds no code so much as a stability commitment to a function users were already calling.

◆ Prediction

With mean_no() stable, the next work most likely targets the prediction and standardization paths rather than the model fit itself.

S
samplr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months

◆ Current state

samplr compares human performance against sampling algorithms, giving cognitive scientists the MCMC machinery to test whether people behave like samplers. Its entire public history is three releases: a 1.0.0 in August 2024, a floating-point fix eighteen seconds later, and then nothing until a February 2026 patch. The release notes are unusually thin even by CRAN standards.

◆ Where it's heading

The feed shows a package that shipped and stopped. The 2024 tags were both created in one sitting and say almost nothing; the 2026 release is a row-count bug in Mean_Variance() bundled with citation metadata, a dropped dependency and http-to-https link fixes — the housekeeping profile of a package being kept alive for the paper that cites it rather than actively developed.

◆ Prediction

Adding citation information to the README is usually the move of a maintainer expecting the package to be referenced rather than extended. On this cadence the next release is more likely another CRAN-hygiene patch than new algorithms; there is not enough in these notes to say otherwise.

Alternatives to JointFPM and samplr

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either JointFPM or samplr.

See all JointFPM alternatives → · See all samplr alternatives →

Recent activity from JointFPM and samplr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5mo agosamplrMean_Variance() row count corrected after eighteen months
  2. 1y agoJointFPMmean_no() promoted to a stable interface
  3. 1y agosamplrFloating point comparison fix
  4. 1y agosamplrsamplr 1.0.0
  5. 2y agoJointFPMsummary() method and control arguments passed to rstpm2
  6. 2y agoJointFPMGaussian quadrature option for the mean-events integration
  7. 2y agoJointFPMStandardized marginal estimates plus input validation
  8. 2y agoJointFPMBug fixes for differences between mean-event functions

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between JointFPM and samplr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. JointFPM and samplr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is JointFPM better than samplr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. JointFPM and samplr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to JointFPM?

Top JointFPM alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "JointFPM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/jointfpm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to samplr?

Top samplr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "samplr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/samplr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.